Literature DB >> 16594765

Testing differences between nested covariance structure models: Power analysis and null hypotheses.

Robert C MacCallum1, Michael W Browne, Li Cai.   

Abstract

For comparing nested covariance structure models, the standard procedure is the likelihood ratio test of the difference in fit, where the null hypothesis is that the models fit identically in the population. A procedure for determining statistical power of this test is presented where effect size is based on a specified difference in overall fit of the models. A modification of the standard null hypothesis of zero difference in fit is proposed allowing for testing an interval hypothesis that the difference in fit between models is small, rather than zero. These developments are combined yielding a procedure for estimating power of a test of a null hypothesis of small difference in fit versus an alternative hypothesis of larger difference. ((c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16594765     DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.11.1.19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Methods        ISSN: 1082-989X


  57 in total

1.  Acculturation and aggression in Latino adolescents: a structural model focusing on cultural risk factors and assets.

Authors:  Paul R Smokowski; Martica L Bacallao
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2006-10

2.  Differentiating between sensation seeking and impulsivity through their mediated relations with alcohol use and problems.

Authors:  Viktoriya Magid; Michael G Maclean; Craig R Colder
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 3.913

3.  Equivalency for father and mother ratings of the ADHD symptoms.

Authors:  Rapson Gomez
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2010-04

4.  Quantified choice of root-mean-square errors of approximation for evaluation and power analysis of small differences between structural equation models.

Authors:  Libo Li; Peter M Bentler
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2011-06

5.  Physical, Emotional, and Sexual Victimization Across Three Generations: a Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Laura Badenes-Ribera; Matteo Angelo Fabris; Laura Elvira Prino; Francesca Giovanna Maria Gastaldi; Claudio Longobardi
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Trauma       Date:  2019-07-02

6.  Factorial validity of the effort-reward imbalance scale: evidence from multi-sample and three-wave follow-up studies.

Authors:  Johanna Rantanen; Taru Feldt; Katriina Hyvönen; Ulla Kinnunen; Anne Mäkikangas
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 3.015

7.  Family environment and self-esteem development: A longitudinal study from age 10 to 16.

Authors:  Samantha Krauss; Ulrich Orth; Richard W Robins
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2019-09-19

8.  Self-efficacy, beliefs, and goals: Moderation of declining physical activity during adolescence.

Authors:  Rod K Dishman; Kerry L McIver; Marsha Dowda; Ruth P Saunders; Russell R Pate
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 4.267

9.  Validation of interpersonal support evaluation list-12 (ISEL-12) scores among English- and Spanish-speaking Hispanics/Latinos from the HCHS/SOL Sociocultural Ancillary Study.

Authors:  Erin L Merz; Scott C Roesch; Vanessa L Malcarne; Frank J Penedo; Maria M Llabre; Orit B Weitzman; Elena L Navas-Nacher; Krista M Perreira; Franklyn Gonzalez; Liliana A Ponguta; Timothy P Johnson; Linda C Gallo
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2013-12-09

10.  Capturing the Central Line Bundle Infection Prevention Interventions: Comparison of Reflective and Composite Modeling Methods.

Authors:  Heather M Gilmartin; Karen H Sousa; Catherine Battaglia
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.381

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.