Literature DB >> 22569590

Surflex-Dock: Docking benchmarks and real-world application.

Russell Spitzer1, Ajay N Jain.   

Abstract

Benchmarks for molecular docking have historically focused on re-docking the cognate ligand of a well-determined protein-ligand complex to measure geometric pose prediction accuracy, and measurement of virtual screening performance has been focused on increasingly large and diverse sets of target protein structures, cognate ligands, and various types of decoy sets. Here, pose prediction is reported on the Astex Diverse set of 85 protein ligand complexes, and virtual screening performance is reported on the DUD set of 40 protein targets. In both cases, prepared structures of targets and ligands were provided by symposium organizers. The re-prepared data sets yielded results not significantly different than previous reports of Surflex-Dock on the two benchmarks. Minor changes to protein coordinates resulting from complex pre-optimization had large effects on observed performance, highlighting the limitations of cognate ligand re-docking for pose prediction assessment. Docking protocols developed for cross-docking, which address protein flexibility and produce discrete families of predicted poses, produced substantially better performance for pose prediction. Performance on virtual screening performance was shown to benefit by employing and combining multiple screening methods: docking, 2D molecular similarity, and 3D molecular similarity. In addition, use of multiple protein conformations significantly improved screening enrichment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22569590      PMCID: PMC3398190          DOI: 10.1007/s10822-011-9533-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  35 in total

1.  Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. 1. Evaluation of different docking/scoring combinations.

Authors:  C Bissantz; G Folkers; D Rognan
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2000-12-14       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  Morphological similarity: a 3D molecular similarity method correlated with protein-ligand recognition.

Authors:  A N Jain
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  The Binding Database: data management and interface design.

Authors:  Xi Chen; Yuhmei Lin; Ming Liu; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Novel inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase/PARP1 and PARP2 identified using a cell-based screen in yeast.

Authors:  E Perkins; D Sun; A Nguyen; S Tulac; M Francesco; H Tavana; H Nguyen; S Tugendreich; P Barthmaier; J Couto; E Yeh; S Thode; K Jarnagin; A Jain; D Morgans; T Melese
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Ligand-based structural hypotheses for virtual screening.

Authors:  Ajay N Jain
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-02-12       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  Surflex: fully automatic flexible molecular docking using a molecular similarity-based search engine.

Authors:  Ajay N Jain
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2003-02-13       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  A detailed comparison of current docking and scoring methods on systems of pharmaceutical relevance.

Authors:  Emanuele Perola; W Patrick Walters; Paul S Charifson
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-08-01

8.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening.

Authors:  Thomas A Halgren; Robert B Murphy; Richard A Friesner; Hege S Beard; Leah L Frye; W Thomas Pollard; Jay L Banks
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 7.446

9.  Automated docking of substrates to proteins by simulated annealing.

Authors:  D S Goodsell; A J Olson
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1990

10.  A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions.

Authors:  I D Kuntz; J M Blaney; S J Oatley; R Langridge; T E Ferrin
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1982-10-25       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  68 in total

1.  In-silico identification of the binding mode of synthesized adamantyl derivatives inside cholinesterase enzymes.

Authors:  Amal Al-Aboudi; Raed A Al-Qawasmeh; Alaa Shahwan; Uzma Mahmood; Asaad Khalid; Zaheer Ul-Haq
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 6.150

2.  Force Field Optimization Guided by Small Molecule Crystal Lattice Data Enables Consistent Sub-Angstrom Protein-Ligand Docking.

Authors:  Hahnbeom Park; Guangfeng Zhou; Minkyung Baek; David Baker; Frank DiMaio
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  GalaxyDock BP2 score: a hybrid scoring function for accurate protein-ligand docking.

Authors:  Minkyung Baek; Woong-Hee Shin; Hwan Won Chung; Chaok Seok
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Octopus: a platform for the virtual high-throughput screening of a pool of compounds against a set of molecular targets.

Authors:  Eduardo Habib Bechelane Maia; Vinícius Alves Campos; Bianca Dos Reis Santos; Marina Santos Costa; Iann Gabriel Lima; Sandro J Greco; Rosy I M A Ribeiro; Felipe M Munayer; Alisson Marques da Silva; Alex Gutterres Taranto
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 1.810

5.  An integrated approach to knowledge-driven structure-based virtual screening.

Authors:  Angela M Henzler; Sascha Urbaczek; Matthias Hilbig; Matthias Rarey
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 6.  Principles and Overview of Sampling Methods for Modeling Macromolecular Structure and Dynamics.

Authors:  Tatiana Maximova; Ryan Moffatt; Buyong Ma; Ruth Nussinov; Amarda Shehu
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 7.  Protonation and pK changes in protein-ligand binding.

Authors:  Alexey V Onufriev; Emil Alexov
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.318

8.  DOCK 6: Impact of new features and current docking performance.

Authors:  William J Allen; Trent E Balius; Sudipto Mukherjee; Scott R Brozell; Demetri T Moustakas; P Therese Lang; David A Case; Irwin D Kuntz; Robert C Rizzo
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 3.376

9.  Homology modeling and molecular dynamics based insights into Chalcone synthase and Chalcone isomerase in Phyllanthus emblica L.

Authors:  Anuj Kumar; Mansi Sharma; Swaroopa Nand Chaubey; Avneesh Kumar
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 2.406

10.  Lessons Learned over Four Benchmark Exercises from the Community Structure-Activity Resource.

Authors:  Heather A Carlson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 4.956

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.