Literature DB >> 14761196

Ligand-based structural hypotheses for virtual screening.

Ajay N Jain1.   

Abstract

The majority of drug targets for small molecule therapeutics are proteins whose three-dimensional structure is not known to sufficient resolution to permit structure-based design. All three-dimensional QSAR approaches have a requirement for some hypothesis of ligand conformation and alignment, and predictions of molecular activity critically depend on this ligand-based binding site hypothesis. The molecular similarity function used in the Surflex docking system, coupled with quantitative pressure to minimize overall molecular volume, forms an effective objective function for generating hypotheses of bioactive conformations of sets of small molecules binding to their cognate proteins. Results are presented, assessing utility of the method for ligands of the serotonin, histamine, muscarinic, and GABA(A) receptors. The Surflex similarity module (Surflex-Sim) was able, in each case, to distinguish true ligands from random compounds using models constructed from just two or three known ligands. True positive rates of 60% were achieved with false positive rates of 0-3%; the theoretical enrichment rates were over 150-fold compared with random screening. The methods are practically applicable for rational design of ligands and for high-throughput virtual screening and offer competitive performance to many structure-based docking algorithms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14761196     DOI: 10.1021/jm030520f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Chem        ISSN: 0022-2623            Impact factor:   7.446


  44 in total

1.  Monoenomycin: A Simplified Trienomycin A Analogue that Manifests Anticancer Activity.

Authors:  Gary E L Brandt; Brian S J Blagg
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 4.345

2.  R-group template CoMFA combines benefits of "ad hoc" and topomer alignments using 3D-QSAR for lead optimization.

Authors:  Richard D Cramer
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 3.  In silico pharmacology for drug discovery: methods for virtual ligand screening and profiling.

Authors:  S Ekins; J Mestres; B Testa
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-06-04       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  Managing bias in ROC curves.

Authors:  Robert D Clark; Daniel J Webster-Clark
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Prediction of off-target drug effects through data fusion.

Authors:  Emmanuel R Yera; Ann E Cleves; Ajay N Jain
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2014

6.  Chemical structural novelty: on-targets and off-targets.

Authors:  Emmanuel R Yera; Ann E Cleves; Ajay N Jain
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 7.  Conformation-activity relationships of polyketide natural products.

Authors:  Erik M Larsen; Matthew R Wilson; Richard E Taylor
Journal:  Nat Prod Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 13.423

8.  Molecular shape and medicinal chemistry: a perspective.

Authors:  Anthony Nicholls; Georgia B McGaughey; Robert P Sheridan; Andrew C Good; Gregory Warren; Magali Mathieu; Steven W Muchmore; Scott P Brown; J Andrew Grant; James A Haigh; Neysa Nevins; Ajay N Jain; Brian Kelley
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 7.446

9.  Modeling MEK4 Kinase Inhibitors through Perturbed Electrostatic Potential Charges.

Authors:  Rama K Mishra; Kristine K Deibler; Matthew R Clutter; Purav P Vagadia; Matthew O'Connor; Gary E Schiltz; Raymond Bergan; Karl A Scheidt
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 4.956

10.  Ligand scaffold hopping combining 3D maximal substructure search and molecular similarity.

Authors:  Flavien Quintus; Olivier Sperandio; Julien Grynberg; Michel Petitjean; Pierre Tuffery
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.