BACKGROUND: Traditional predictors of neurological prognosis after cardiac arrest are unreliable after targeted temperature management. Absence of pupillary reflexes remains a reliable predictor of poor outcome. Diffusion-weighted imaging has emerged as a potential predictor of recovery, and here we compare imaging characteristics to pupillary exam. METHODS: We identified 69 patients who had MRIs within seven days of arrest and used a semi-automated algorithm to perform quantitative volumetric analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) sequences at various thresholds. Area under receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC-AUC) were estimated to compare predictive values of quantitative MRI with pupillary exam at days 3, 5 and 7 post-arrest, for persistence of coma and functional outcomes at discharge. Cerebral Performance Category scores of 3-4 were considered poor outcome. RESULTS: Excluding patients where life support was withdrawn, ≥2.8% diffusion restriction of the entire brain at an ADC of ≤650×10-6m2/s was 100% specific and 68% sensitive for failure to wake up from coma before discharge. The ROC-AUC of ADC changes at ≤450×10-6mm2/s and ≤650×10-6mm2/s were significantly superior in predicting failure to wake up from coma compared to bilateral absence of pupillary reflexes. Among survivors, >0.01% of diffusion restriction of the entire brain at an ADC ≤450×10-6m2/s was 100% specific and 46% sensitive for poor functional outcome at discharge. The ROC curve predicting poor functional outcome at ADC ≤450×10-6mm2/s had an AUC of 0.737 (0.574-0.899, p=0.04). CONCLUSION: Post-anoxic diffusion changes using quantitative brain MRI may aid in predicting persistent coma and poor functional outcomes at hospital discharge.
BACKGROUND: Traditional predictors of neurological prognosis after cardiac arrest are unreliable after targeted temperature management. Absence of pupillary reflexes remains a reliable predictor of poor outcome. Diffusion-weighted imaging has emerged as a potential predictor of recovery, and here we compare imaging characteristics to pupillary exam. METHODS: We identified 69 patients who had MRIs within seven days of arrest and used a semi-automated algorithm to perform quantitative volumetric analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) sequences at various thresholds. Area under receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC-AUC) were estimated to compare predictive values of quantitative MRI with pupillary exam at days 3, 5 and 7 post-arrest, for persistence of coma and functional outcomes at discharge. Cerebral Performance Category scores of 3-4 were considered poor outcome. RESULTS: Excluding patients where life support was withdrawn, ≥2.8% diffusion restriction of the entire brain at an ADC of ≤650×10-6m2/s was 100% specific and 68% sensitive for failure to wake up from coma before discharge. The ROC-AUC of ADC changes at ≤450×10-6mm2/s and ≤650×10-6mm2/s were significantly superior in predicting failure to wake up from coma compared to bilateral absence of pupillary reflexes. Among survivors, >0.01% of diffusion restriction of the entire brain at an ADC ≤450×10-6m2/s was 100% specific and 46% sensitive for poor functional outcome at discharge. The ROC curve predicting poor functional outcome at ADC ≤450×10-6mm2/s had an AUC of 0.737 (0.574-0.899, p=0.04). CONCLUSION: Post-anoxic diffusion changes using quantitative brain MRI may aid in predicting persistent coma and poor functional outcomes at hospital discharge.
Authors: Olga G Ananiadou; George E Drossos; Katerina N Bibou; George M Palatianos; Elizabeth O Johnson Journal: Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg Date: 2005-09-16
Authors: R O Cummins; D A Chamberlain; N S Abramson; M Allen; P J Baskett; L Becker; L Bossaert; H H Delooz; W F Dick; M S Eisenberg Journal: Circulation Date: 1991-08 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: M J A Kamps; J Horn; M Oddo; J E Fugate; C Storm; T Cronberg; C A Wijman; O Wu; J M Binnekade; C W E Hoedemaekers Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2013-06-26 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Michael Mlynash; Dennis M Campbell; Emily M Leproust; Nancy J Fischbein; Roland Bammer; Irina Eyngorn; Amie W Hsia; Michael Moseley; Christine A C Wijman Journal: Stroke Date: 2010-07-01 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Karen G Hirsch; Michael Mlynash; Sofie Jansen; Suzanne Persoon; Irina Eyngorn; Michael V Krasnokutsky; Christine A C Wijman; Nancy J Fischbein Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2014-07-15 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: K G Hirsch; M Mlynash; I Eyngorn; R Pirsaheli; A Okada; S Komshian; C Chen; S A Mayer; J F Meschia; R A Bernstein; O Wu; D M Greer; C A Wijman; G W Albers Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Christine A C Wijman; Michael Mlynash; Anna Finley Caulfield; Amie W Hsia; Irina Eyngorn; Roland Bammer; Nancy Fischbein; Gregory W Albers; Michael Moseley Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Neill K J Adhikari; Damon C Scales; Carmen Lopez Soto; Laura Dragoi; Chinthaka C Heyn; Andreas Kramer; Ruxandra Pinto Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Peggy L Nguyen; Laith Alreshaid; Roy A Poblete; Geoffrey Konye; Jonathan Marehbian; Gene Sung Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2018-09-11 Impact factor: 4.003