| Literature DB >> 22565477 |
Mayron Alves de Vasconcelos1, Claudio Oliveira Cunha, Francisco Vassiliepe Sousa Arruda, Victor Alves Carneiro, Fabio Martins Mercante, Luiz Gonzaga do Nascimento Neto, Giselly Soares de Sousa, Bruno Anderson Matias Rocha, Edson Holanda Teixeira, Benildo Sousa Cavada, Ricardo Pires dos Santos.
Abstract
To study the interactions between a Rhizobium tropici strain and lectins isolated from the seeds of Canavalia ensiformis (ConA) and Canavalia brasiliensis (ConBr), a lectin fluorescence assay was performed. In addition, an experiment was designed to evaluate the effect of the two lectins on bacterial growth. Both lectins were found to bind to R. tropici cells, but the interactions were inhibited by D-mannose. Interestingly, only ConBr stimulated bacterial growth in proportion to the concentrations used (15.6-500 μg/mL), and the bacterial growth stimulation was inhibited by D-mannose as well. Structure/Function analyses by bioinformatics were carried out to evaluate the volume and carbohydrate recognition domain (CRD) configuration of ConA and ConBr. The difference of spatial arrangement and volume of CRD may indicate the variation between biological activities of both lectins. The results suggest that ConBr could be a promising tool for studies focusing on the interactions between rhizobia and host plants.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22565477 PMCID: PMC6268693 DOI: 10.3390/molecules17055244
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Lectin-fluorescence microscopy of interaction between FITC-lectins and Rhizobium tropici CIAT 899. (a) FITC-ConA; (b) FITC-ConBr; (c) FITC-ConA plus D-mannose; and (d) FITC-ConBr plus D-mannose.
Figure 2(a) Effect of ConBr on the growth of R. tropici. () p < 0.01 related to 0.15 M NaCl; (b) Comparison between the effects of ConBr and ConBr complexed with D-mannose on the growth of R. tropici. () p < 0.01 related to ConBr plus D-mannose.
Figure 3(a) Effect of ConBr complexed with D-mannose on the growth of R. tropici; (b) Effect of ConA on the growth of R. tropici.
Figure 4Surface analysis and structure alignment of ConA and ConBr tridimensional structures. (A) Carbohydrate binding site of ConA (Blue); (B) Carbohydrate binding site of ConBr (Red); (C) Structure alignment of ConA and ConBr showing differences in the topology which favors ConBr interactions with LPS; (D) Schematic representation of site volume in ConA (right) and ConBr (left). Calculated volume of each site is represented inside the schemes. Black lines in (A) and (B) delimitate the topology of sites.