Literature DB >> 22560955

Binocular retinal image differences influence eye-position signals for perceived visual direction.

Deepika Sridhar1, Harold E Bedell.   

Abstract

Correctly perceiving the direction of a visible object with respect to one's self (egocentric visual direction) requires that information about the location of the image on the retina (oculocentric visual direction) be combined with signals about the position of the eyes in the head. The Wells-Hering laws that govern the perception of visual direction and modern restatements of these laws assume implicitly that retinal and eye-position information are independent of one another. By measuring observers' manual pointing responses to targets in different horizontal locations, we show that retinal and eye-position information are not treated independently in the brain. In particular, decreasing the relative visibility of one eye's retinal image reduces the strength of the eye-position signal associated with that eye. The results can be accounted for by interactions between eye-specific retinal and eye-position signals at a common neural location.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22560955      PMCID: PMC3374399          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.04.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  53 in total

1.  Visual signals contribute to the coding of gaze direction.

Authors:  Jean Blouin; Nicolas Amade; Jean-Louis Vercher; Normand Teasdale; Gabriel M Gauthier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-04-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effect of defocus on visual acuity as measured by source and observer methods.

Authors:  G Smith; R J Jacobs; C D Chan
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Visual localization after strabismus surgery is compatible with the "outflow" theory.

Authors:  O Bock; G Kommerell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Quantitative assessment of disparity vergence components.

Authors:  J L Semmlow; G K Hung; K J Ciuffreda
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Suppression behavior analyzed as a function of monovision addition power.

Authors:  D A Heath; C Hines; F Schwartz
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1986-03

6.  The spatial properties of binocular suppression zone.

Authors:  L Liu; C M Schor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  A quantitative analysis of eye movements during the cover test--a preliminary report.

Authors:  N A Barnard; W D Thomson
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  An alternative three-dimensional interpretation of Hering's equal-innervation law for version and vergence eye movements.

Authors:  A W Minken; C C Gielen; J A Van Gisbergen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Dynamics of cover test eye movements.

Authors:  E Peli; G McCormack
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1983-08

10.  Journal of experimental psychology: human perception and performance.

Authors:  H Ono; E U Weber
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  2 in total

1.  Leftward Deviation and Asymmetric Speed of Egocentric Judgment between Left and Right Visual Fields.

Authors:  Ying Zhou; Bing Li; Gang Wang; Mingsha Zhang; Yujun Pan
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 4.677

2.  Slant of a Surface Shifts Binocular Visual Direction.

Authors:  Tsutomu Kusano; Koichi Shimono
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.