Literature DB >> 22560168

Evaluation of commercial screening tests and blot assays for the diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis.

Laurent Busson1, Marijke Reynders, Sigi Van den Wijngaert, Hafid Dahma, Marc Decolvenaer, Liesbet Vasseur, Olivier Vandenberg.   

Abstract

The performance of 4 screening tests and 10 blot assays for the serologic diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis in a Belgian population was evaluated. A total of 196 sera were tested: 36 Lyme borreliosis at different stages of the disease, 50 healthy blood donors, and 110 representing various clinical circumstances. The DiaSorin Liaison and Euroimmun Anti-Borrelia screening tests were evaluated. The tested blot assays were Virotech Borrelia LINE tests WE222, WE225, and WE224, as well as Mikrogen recomLine Borrelia and Viramed ViraStripe. The specificity of IgG was acceptable for the different assays. For IgM, DiaSorin Liaison Borrelia IgM Quant, Mikrogen recomLine, and Viramed ViraStripe lacked specificity. Interestingly, a higher rate of falsely reactive samples was observed in the group of patients suffering from malaria. Serological diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis remains challenging; assays should be evaluated in the population where they are intended to be used.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22560168     DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  10 in total

1.  Utility of serodiagnostics designed for use in the United States for detection of Lyme borreliosis acquired in Europe and vice versa.

Authors:  Gary P Wormser; Aimee T Tang; Natasha R Schimmoeller; Susan Bittker; Denise Cooper; Paul Visintainer; Maria E Aguero-Rosenfeld; Katarina Ogrinc; Franc Strle; Gerold Stanek
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  DNA persistence after treatment of Lyme borreliosis.

Authors:  D Pícha; L Moravcová; D Vaňousová; J Hercogová; Z Blechová
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 2.099

3.  Evaluation of two commercially available rapid diagnostic tests for Lyme borreliosis.

Authors:  P W Smit; S Kurkela; M Kuusi; O Vapalahti
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Diagnostic Performance of the Novel BioPlex Lyme Serological Assays in European Patients with Lyme Disease.

Authors:  M E (Ewoud) Baarsma; Jeanine Ursinus; Hans L Zaaijer; Herman Kuiper; Joppe W Hovius
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Laboratory Diagnosis of Lyme Borreliosis.

Authors:  John A Branda; Allen C Steere
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 26.132

6.  Serodiagnosis of Lyme borreliosis-is IgM in serum more harmful than helpful?

Authors:  Henrik Hillerdal; Anna J Henningsson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Commercial test kits for detection of Lyme borreliosis: a meta-analysis of test accuracy.

Authors:  Michael J Cook; Basant K Puri
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2016-11-18

8.  Modified interpretation criteria significantly improve performance of commercially available confirmatory assays for the serodiagnosis of Lyme borreliosis: a case-control study with clinically defined serum samples.

Authors:  Ulrike Hauser
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 3.267

9.  Investigation of the performance of serological assays used for Lyme disease testing in Australia.

Authors:  Susan J Best; Marlene I Tschaepe; Kim M Wilson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Serological Diagnostics of Lyme Borreliosis: Comparison of Universal and Borrelia Species-Specific Tests Based on Whole-Cell and Recombinant Antigens.

Authors:  Petr Kodym; Zuzana Kurzová; Dagmar Berenová; Dušan Pícha; Dita Smíšková; Lenka Moravcová; Marek Malý
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 5.948

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.