| Literature DB >> 25073771 |
P W Smit1,2, S Kurkela3,4, M Kuusi5, O Vapalahti3,4,6.
Abstract
The diagnosis of Lyme disease is very complicated and a single diagnostic method cannot exclude infection. We assessed the performance of two commercially available Borrelia burgdorferi rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) in comparison to multiple laboratory-based diagnostic assays using specimens with a gradually increasing probability of Borrelia infection. Based on 200 specimens, the analytical sensitivities for IgG and IgM were 18 and 23% for the Lyme RDT and 24 and 32% for the Borreliose Complete RDT. The sensitivity for detecting diagnosed Lyme borreliosis cases was low (26% Lyme RDT and 32% with the Borreliose Complete RDT respectively), whereas the specificity was good (85% Lyme RDT and 88% Borreliose Complete). Based on this evaluation, the performance of RDTs in detecting Lyme borreliosis appeared to be below that of laboratory-based diagnostics.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25073771 DOI: 10.1007/s10096-014-2217-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ISSN: 0934-9723 Impact factor: 3.267