Literature DB >> 33883179

Diagnostic Performance of the Novel BioPlex Lyme Serological Assays in European Patients with Lyme Disease.

M E (Ewoud) Baarsma1, Jeanine Ursinus1, Hans L Zaaijer2, Herman Kuiper3,4, Joppe W Hovius1.   

Abstract

Serodiagnosis of Lyme borreliosis (LB) comes with several drawbacks, among which is limited sensitivity in early disease. This study assesses the sensitivity and specificity of the novel BioPlex 2200 Lyme IgG and Lyme IgM assays. It also assesses potential improvements to the assays through receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The BioPlex assays were performed on sera of 158 Dutch patients with physician-confirmed LB (both early localized and disseminated), 800 healthy blood donors from the Netherlands, and 90 cross-reactive controls. The BioPlex (Biopl) assays were compared with two commercial enzyme immunoassays (Euroimmun [Eur]/C6-ELISA) and one immunoblot (recomLine). The highest sensitivity in early LB was achieved with the BioPlex assays, which outperformed the Euroimmun and C6-ELISA (Biopl: 81/88, 92.1%; Eur: 64/88, 72.7%; C6: 72/88, 81.8%). Sensitivity of all assays was comparable in patients with disseminated LB. The BioPlex assays were outperformed in terms of specificity (all healthy blood donors, Biopl: 571/800, 71.4%; Eur: 711/800, 88.9%; C6: 727/800, 90.9%), but further analyses showed promising avenues following cutoff optimization. ROC analysis showed that 2/6 antigens of the combined BioPlex IgG and IgM assays had significantly higher areas under the curve (AUCs) than those of the other analyses. Potential modified versions of the assays based on these antigens largely outperformed the Euroimmun and C6-ELISA in EM patients (Biopl: 81/80, 92.1%) while maintaining a comparable or even higher specificity (Biopl: 714/800, 89.3%). The BioPlex 2200 Lyme IgG and Lyme IgM assays are promising tools for the serodiagnosis of early LB, with the potential to be used as a standalone test. Further research is necessary to validate the findings of this discovery cohort.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BioPlex Lyme; C6-ELISA; Lyme borreliosis; multiplex flow immunoassay; serology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33883179      PMCID: PMC8218729          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.03205-20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  28 in total

Review 1.  Case-control and two-gate designs in diagnostic accuracy studies.

Authors:  Anne W S Rutjes; Johannes B Reitsma; Jan P Vandenbroucke; Afina S Glas; Patrick M M Bossuyt
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2005-06-16       Impact factor: 8.327

2.  Lyme borreliosis: clinical case definitions for diagnosis and management in Europe.

Authors:  G Stanek; V Fingerle; K-P Hunfeld; B Jaulhac; R Kaiser; A Krause; W Kristoferitsch; S O'Connell; K Ornstein; F Strle; J Gray
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 8.067

3.  Clinical characteristics and treatment outcome of early Lyme disease in patients with microbiologically confirmed erythema migrans.

Authors:  Robert P Smith; Robert T Schoen; Daniel W Rahn; Vijay K Sikand; John Nowakowski; Dennis L Parenti; Mary S Holman; David H Persing; Allen C Steere
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  A Fully Automated Multiplex Assay for Diagnosis of Lyme Disease with High Specificity and Improved Early Sensitivity.

Authors:  Johnnie B Hahm; John W Breneman; Jing Liu; Svetlana Rabkina; Weiming Zheng; Shuxia Zhou; Roger P Walker; Ravi Kaul
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Lyme Borreliosis Serology: Performance of Several Commonly Used Laboratory Diagnostic Tests and a Large Resource Panel of Well-Characterized Patient Samples.

Authors:  Claudia R Molins; Mark J Delorey; Christopher Sexton; Martin E Schriefer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Solitary erythema migrans: a clinical, laboratory and epidemiological study of 77 Dutch patients.

Authors:  H Kuiper; I Cairo; A Van Dam; B De Jongh; T Ramselaar; L Spanjaard; J Dankert
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 9.302

7.  The clinical spectrum of early Lyme borreliosis in patients with culture-confirmed erythema migrans.

Authors:  R B Nadelman; J Nowakowski; G Forseter; N S Goldberg; S Bittker; D Cooper; M Aguero-Rosenfeld; G P Wormser
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  A Dutch nationwide evaluation of serological assays for detection of Borrelia antibodies in clinically well-defined patients.

Authors:  C W Ang; A H Brandenburg; N D van Burgel; H A Bijlmer; T Herremans; F Stelma; F Verduyn Lunel; A P van Dam
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 2.803

9.  Development of a Multiantigen Panel for Improved Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi Infection in Early Lyme Disease.

Authors:  Lauren J Lahey; Michael W Panas; Rong Mao; Michelle Delanoy; John J Flanagan; Steven R Binder; Alison W Rebman; Jose G Montoya; Mark J Soloski; Allen C Steere; Raymond J Dattwyler; Paul M Arnaboldi; John N Aucott; William H Robinson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Different genospecies of Borrelia burgdorferi are associated with distinct clinical manifestations of Lyme borreliosis.

Authors:  A P van Dam; H Kuiper; K Vos; A Widjojokusumo; B M de Jongh; L Spanjaard; A C Ramselaar; M D Kramer; J Dankert
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 9.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.