Literature DB >> 22558074

Enhancing production of bio-isoprene using hybrid MVA pathway and isoprene synthase in E. coli.

Jianming Yang1, Mo Xian, Sizheng Su, Guang Zhao, Qingjuan Nie, Xinglin Jiang, Yanning Zheng, Wei Liu.   

Abstract

The depleting petroleum reserve, increasingly severe energy crisis, and global climate change are reigniting enthusiasm for seeking sustainable technologies to replace petroleum as a source of fuel and chemicals. In this paper, the efficiency of the MVA pathway on isoprene production has been improved as follows: firstly, in order to increase MVA production, the source of the "upper pathway" which contains HMG-CoA synthase, acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase and HMG-CoA reductase to covert acetyl-CoA into MVA has been changed from Saccharomyces cerevisiae to Enterococcus faecalis; secondly, to further enhance the production of MVA and isoprene, a alanine 110 of the mvaS gene has been mutated to a glycine. The final genetic strain YJM25 containing the optimized MVA pathway and isoprene synthase from Populus alba can accumulate isoprene up to 6.3 g/L after 40 h of fed-batch cultivation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22558074      PMCID: PMC3338741          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Isoprene (2-methyl-1,3-butadiene) was firstly discovered as a cell metabolite in the mid-1950s by Sanadze.[1], [2]. It functions as a thermoprotectant of plant membranes or as an antioxidant [3], [4], or may have a signaling function, altering the flowering time in some plants [5]. As an important platform chemical, isoprene has been used in industrial production of synthetic rubber for tires and coatings [6] or aviation fuel [7]. Isoprene is the progenitor of the isoprenoid family of compounds[8]. Many commercially relevant isoprenoids exist in nature in small quantity and the yield produced from their natural organisms remains rather low. The depletion of fossil sources and the structural complexity of isoprenoids make it difficult or costly to produce isoprenoids by means of chemical synthesis. Isoprene is no exception since it is produced entirely from petrochemical sources through chemical synthesis method [9], [10], [11]. Compared with conventional means, microbial synthesis of isoprene by fermentation should become a promising and attractive route mainly for environmental production, renewable resources, sustainable development[12]. Additionally, isoprene could be collected from the gas phase of the fermentor, eliminating the need for distillation. All isoprenoids are biosynthesized from the same basic units, isopentenyl diphosphate (pyrophosphate IPP), and its isomer dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMAPP), which are synthesized from two different pathways including methylerythritol 4-phosphate (MEP) pathway and mevalonate (MVA) pathway (Fig.1) [13]. MVA pathway mainly exists in eukaryotes, archaebacteria, and cytosols of higher plants, while the MEP pathway is used by many eubacteria, green algae, and chloroplasts of higher plant [14], [15]. MVA pathway has been studied extensively for producing isoprenoids. The introduction of heterologous MVA pathway genes into E. coli has been reported to improve the productivity of carotenoids or sesquiterpenes that are synthesized from DMAPP[16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22].
Figure 1

Production of isoprene via the MVA pathways used in this study.

Gene symbols and the enzymes they encode (all genes marked with white arrows were isolated from S. cerevisiae, the gene marked with light gray arrows derived from P. alba and all genes marked with gray arrows were from Enterococcus faecalis). MVA pathway: ERG10, acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase; ERG13, HMG-CoA synthase; tHMGR, truncated HMG-CoA reductase; MvaE, acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase/HMG-CoA reductase; MvaS, HMG-CoA synthase; ERG12, mevalonate kinase; ERG8, phosphomevalonate kinase; ERG19, mevalonate pyrophosphate decarboxylase; IDI1, IPP isomerase; ispSPa, P. alba isoprene synthase was optimized to the preferred codon usage of E. coli. Pathway intermediates. MVA pathway: A-CoA, acetyl-CoA; AA-CoA, acetoacetyl-CoA; HMG-CoA, hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA; Mev-P, mevalonate 5-phosphate; Mev-PP, mevalonate pyrophosphate. IPP, isopentenyl pyrophosphate; DMAPP, dimethylallyl pyrophosphate.

Production of isoprene via the MVA pathways used in this study.

Gene symbols and the enzymes they encode (all genes marked with white arrows were isolated from S. cerevisiae, the gene marked with light gray arrows derived from P. alba and all genes marked with gray arrows were from Enterococcus faecalis). MVA pathway: ERG10, acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase; ERG13, HMG-CoA synthase; tHMGR, truncated HMG-CoA reductase; MvaE, acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase/HMG-CoA reductase; MvaS, HMG-CoA synthase; ERG12, mevalonate kinase; ERG8, phosphomevalonate kinase; ERG19, mevalonate pyrophosphate decarboxylase; IDI1, IPP isomerase; ispSPa, P. alba isoprene synthase was optimized to the preferred codon usage of E. coli. Pathway intermediates. MVA pathway: A-CoA, acetyl-CoA; AA-CoA, acetoacetyl-CoA; HMG-CoA, hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA; Mev-P, mevalonate 5-phosphate; Mev-PP, mevalonate pyrophosphate. IPP, isopentenyl pyrophosphate; DMAPP, dimethylallyl pyrophosphate. Although MVA pathway has been studied comprehensively, the methylerythritol phosphate (MEP) pathway was merely discovered in the early 1990s by labeling experiments in bacteria and plants[23], [24], and till 2001 the genes of whole MEP pathway has been completely characterized [25]. This biosynthetic pathway, made up of seven enzymatic steps, begins with the condensation of pyruvate and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate to form 1-deoxy-D-xylulose 5-phosphate (DXP) and ends with the formation of the isoprenoid precursors isopentenyl diphosphate (IPP) and dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMAPP) [26], [27]. In spite of great efforts taken in isoprenoids production using MEP pathway[28], [29], [30], this approach still remains ineffective due to regulation mechanisms present in the native host[18]. In this paper, based on our previous experiments, the efficiency of the MVA pathway on isoprene production has largely been improved as follows: firstly, in order to increase MVA production, the source of the “upper pathway” which contains HMG-CoA synthase, acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase and HMG-CoA reductase to covert acetyl-CoA into MVA has been changed from Saccharomyces cerevisiae to Enterococcus faecalis; secondly, to further enhance the production of MVA and isoprene, a alanine 110 of the mvaS gene has been mutated to a glycine. The final genetic strain YJM25 containing the optimized MVA pathway and isoprene synthase from P. alba can accumulate isoprene up to 6.3 g/L after 40 h of fed-batch cultivation, which is approximately a 12-fold increase in isoprene production compared with the previous data [25].

Materials and Methods

Bacterial Strains, Plasmids, and Growth Conditions

All Strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. E. coli strains were grown in LB medium. For MVA or isoprene production, recombinant strains were cultured in shake-flask or fed-batch fermentation with the medium containing glucose 20 g/l, K2HPO4 9.8 g/l, beef extract 5 g/l, ferric ammonium citrate 0.3 g/l, citric acid monohydrate 2.1 g/l, MgSO4 0.06 g/l and 1 ml trace element solution which includes (NH4)6 Mo7O24·4H2O 0.37 g/l, ZnSO4·7 H2O 0.29 g/l, H3BO4 2.47 g/l, CuSO4·5H2O 0.25 g/l, and MnCl2·4H2O 1.58 g/l. If necessary, appropriate antibiotics were added to the culture medium at the following concentration: ampicillin (Amp, 100 µg/ml), kanamycin (Kan, 50 µg/ml), and chloramphenicol (Cm, 34 µg/ml).
Table 1

Strains, plasmids and Oligonucleotide primers used in this study.

NameRelevant characteristicsReferences
Strains
E.coli BL21(DE3)F ompT hsdSB (rB mB ) gal dcm rne131 λ(DE3)Invitrogen
E.coli JM109(DE3) endA1 recA1 gyrA96 thi hsdR17 (rk mk+) relA1supE44 Δ(lac-proAB) [F′ traD36proAB+ laqIqZΔM15] λ(DE3)TaKaRa
E.coli BL21star (DE3)F ompT hsdSB (rB mB ) gal dcm rne131 lon λ(DE3)Invitrogen
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Type strainATCC
YJM8 E.coli BL21(DE3)/pYJM8 [1]
YJM11 E.coli BL21(DE3)/pYJM13 [1]
YJM12 E.coli BL21(DE3)/pYJM8,pYJM14 [1]
YJM13 E.coli BL21(DE3)/pYJM8, pYJM13,pYJM14 [1]
YJM16 E.coli BL21(DE3)/pYJM16This study
YJM17 E.coli BL21(DE3)/pYJM17This study
YJM20 E.coli BL21(DE3)/pYJM20,pYJM14This study
YJM21 E.coli BL21(DE3)/pYJM21, pYJM14This study
YJM22 E.coli JM109(DE3)/pYJM20,pYJM14This study
YJM23 E.coli JM109(DE3)/pYJM21,pYJM14This study
YJM24 E.coli BL21star(DE3)/pYJM20,pYJM14This study
YJM25 E.coli BL21star (DE3)/pYJM21,pYJM14This study
Plasmids
pACYCDuet-1P15A (pACYC184), Cmr Novagen
pCOLADuet™-1ColA origin, Kanr Novagen
pTrcHis2BpBR322 origin, Ampr Invitrogen
pYJM8pACYCDuet-1 carrying ispSPa from Populus alba [1]
pYJM13pCOLADuet™-1 carrying ERG10, ERG13 and tHMGR, from Saccharomyces cerevisiae [1]
pYJM14pTrcHis2B carrying ERG12, ERG8, ERG19 and IDI1 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae [1]
pYJM15pACYCDuet-1 carrying mvaE from Enterococcus faecalis This study
pYJM16pACYCDuet-1 carrying mvaE and mvaSfrom Enterococcus faecalis This study
pYJM17pACYCDuet-1 carrying mvaE and mvaSMT from Enterococcus faecalis This study
pYJM18pACYCDuet-1 carrying mvaE fromEnterococcus faecalis, ispSPa from Populus alba This study
pYJM20pACYCDuet-1 carrying mvaE and mvaS from Enterococcus faecalis, ispSPa from Populus alba This study
pYJM21pACYCDuet-1 carrying mvaE and mvaSMTfrom Enterococcus faecalis, ispSPa from Populus alba This study

Plasmid Construction

Standard DNA manipulations were carried out as previously described by Sambrook et al. [31]. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed using Pfu DNA polymerase (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) according to the manufacturer’s instruction.

Construction of Plasmid for Upper pathway of MVA

The mvaS (HMG-CoA synthase, GenBank No. AAG02439) and mvaE (acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase/HMG-CoA reductase, GenBank No. AAG02438) genes from E. faecalis were chemically synthesized by Genray Company with plasmid pGH as vector (named pGH/mvaS, pGH/mvaE). The mvaE was obtained by PCR using the primers mvaE-F (5′-CATGCCATGGAGGAGGTAAAAAAACATGAAAACAGTAGTTATTATTGATGC-3′) and mvaE-R (5′-CGCGGATCCTTATTGTTTTCTTAAATCATTTAAAATAG-3′) and pGH/mvaE as a template. The isolated mvaE gene fragment was excised using NcoI and BamHI, followed by insertion into the corresponding sites of pACYCDuet-1 or pYJM8 to create pYJM15 and pYJM18 respectively. The mvaS gene was obtained by PCR using the primers mvaS-F (5′-CCAGAGCTCAGGAGGTAAAAAAACATGACAATTGG GATTGATAAAATTA-3′) and mvaS-R (5′-CAACTGCAGTTAGTTTCGATAAGAGCGAA CG-3′) and pGH/mvaS as a template. The product of mvaS was introduced behind the mvaE gene of pYJM15 or pYJM18 after restriction with SacI and PstI to create pYJM16 (Fig.2A) and pYJM20 (Fig.2C).
Figure 2

Plasmids used in this study.

Construction of Plasmid for Lower Pathway of MVA

Plasmid pYJM14 was constructed on pTrcHis2B by introducing the ERG8, ERG12, ERG19 and IDI1 from S. cerevisiae. The four genes were ligated into the plasmid pTrcHis2B using the method established in our lab [25], [32] as follows: successive substrate fragments that designed to have long overlaps with each other were mixed, denatured and annealed. Then a circle plasmid can form and be ready for transformation. The plasmid containing four genes (ERG12, ERG8, ERG19 and IDI1) was named pYJM14. The correct insertions of these genes into vectors were confirmed by PCR, restriction digestion and subsequent sequencing.

Mutation of mvaS Gene from Enterococcus Faecalis

The mutation PCR procedure was performed according to the instruction of Fast Mutagenesis System purchased from TransGen Biotech (Beijing, China). Mutagenesis mixtures contained 10×EasyPfu polymerase buffer 2.5 µl, 200 µM dNTPs, 1 ng/ul template, 500 nM each primer, and 1 µl EasyPfu DNA polymerase. The mutated mvaS gene as described by[33] (mvaS, A110G) was obtained by PCR using the primers mvaSMT−F (mutation underlined, 5′-CTCTTTCGAAATCAAGGAA) and mvaSMT−R (5′-CTTCCTTGATTTCGAAAGAGCGAGCGAAAG-3′) and pGH/mvaS as a template. The product of mvaS was cloned into the plasmid pYJM15 or pYJM18 behind the mvaE gene after restriction with SacI and PstI to create pYJM17 (Fig.2B) and pYJM21 (Fig.2D) respectively. The pYJM17 and pYJM21 were transformed into the BL21(DE3) competent cell for expression.

MVA Quantification by Gas Chromatography (GC)

The mevalonate produced by the engineered strains was quantitatively analyzed by GC-FID as described previously [34]. The E. coli strain was inoculated in 50 ml fermentation medium containing 34 µg/ml Cm resistance and incubated at 37°C and 180 rpm. When OD600 of the bacterial culture reached 0.6, the culture cells were induced by IPTG at a final concentration of 0.5 mM for 24 h. After fermentation broth was centrifuged for 10 min at 12000 rpm at room temperature, the supernatant was adjusted to pH 2.0 with 3 M HCl and incubated at 45°C for 1 h to convert mevalonate to mevalonic acid lactone. Then this solution was saturated with Na2SO4, and extracted with ethyl acetate. The ethyl acetate phase was transferred to a clean glass vial and dried by vacuum distillation. The residues were re-dissolved in 1 ml of ethyl acetate and analyzed by GC. GC analysis was performed on an Agilent 7890A equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID) and a HP-AL/S column (25 m×320 µm×8 µm). N2 was used as carrier gas with a linear velocity of 1 ml/min. The column temperature profile was 75°C for 0.5 min, 25°C/min to 150°C, 15°C/min to 200°C, 30°C/min to 250°C, and 250°C for 5 min. The product was characterized by direct comparison with an authentic standard (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). The peak area was converted to MVA concentration by comparing with a standard curve plotted with a set of known concentration of MVA.

Shake-flask Cultures

Shake-flask experiments were carried out in triplicate series of 600 ml sealed shake flasks containing 50 ml fermentation medium as described above plus 34 µg/ml Cm and 100 µg/ml Amp. E. coli strains were inoculated to the culture broth and incubated in a gyratory shaker incubator at 37°C and 180 rpm. When OD600 reached 0.6, IPTG was added to final concentration of 0.5 mM, and culture was further incubated at 30°C for 24 h. Then 1 ml gas sample from the headspace of the sealed cultures was analyzed as described earlier [35] using a GC (Agilent 7890A, America) equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID) and a HP-AL/S column (25 m×320 µm×8 µm). To identify bacterial isoprene production, peak retention times and mass spectra were compared with that of standard. Concentrations of isoprene produced by bacterial cells were calculated by converting GC peak area to mg of isoprene via a calibration curve. Isoprene standard (TCI-EP, Tokyo, Japan) of various concentrations was added to 600 ml fermentation medium to make a calibration curve.

Fed-batch Fermentation

The strain was grown overnight at 37°C in 100 ml of M9 minimal media (containing K2HPO4 1 g, Na2HPO4·12H2O 15.3 g, KH2PO4 3 g, NH4Cl 1 g; NaCl 0.5 g, MgSO4 0.5 mmol in 1 L with glucose (20 g/L) as the primary carbon source). These cultures were used to inoculate a 5-L fermentor (BIOSTAT Bplus MO5L, Sartorius, Germany) containing 3 L fermentation medium. The temperature was controlled at 30°C; the pH was maintained at 7.0 via automated addition of ammonia, and Antifoam 204 was used to prohibit foam development. The stirring speed was first set at 400 rpm and then associated with the dissolved oxygen (DO) to maintain a DO concentration of 20% saturation. The expression of plasmid-borne exogenous gene(s) for isoprene production was initiated at an OD600 of 12 by adding IPTG to the final concentration of 0.5 mM and inducer was added every 8 h. During the course of fermentation, the residual glucose was measured using a glucose analyzer (SBA-40D, China) and maintained below 0.5 g/l by feeding solution containing 800 g/L of glucose at appropriate rates. Then isoprene accumulation was measured every 15 min by GC as described [35]. At the same time, the growth of the bacterial culture was determined by measuring the OD600 with a spectrophotometer (Cary 50 UV-Vis, Varian).

Results and Discussion

Characterization of the Rate-limiting Step of MVA Pathway

In our previous work, a novel pathway for production of isoprene was established by assembling the whole MVA pathway derived from S. cerevisiae and isoprene synthase (IspS) from Populus alba in the E. coli BL21(DE3) strain. The final engineered strain YJM13 harboring the MVA pathway and ispS gene could accumulate isoprene up to 2.48 mg/L and 532 mg/L under the flask and fed-batch fermentation conditions, respectively [25]. However, the yield of isoprene by the engineered strain YJM13 is too low to meet the demand for industrial application. The low yield of isoprene might be primarily attributed to the existing of rate-limiting step of MVA pathway. In the previous study, the whole MVA pathway was divided into two parts and studied respectively: the “upper pathway”, which catalyzed the acetyl-CoA to MVA; the “lower pathway”, which converted MVA into DMAPP, and then was catalyzed by isoprene synthase into isoprene. As for the study of the efficiency of “lower pathway”, the plasmids pYJM14 and pYJM8 were simultaneously transformed into the E. coli strain. To determine the extent to which isoprene production could be enhanced with increased availability of MVA, different concentrations of MVA were added to the culture broth. The maximum isoprene productions of 57, 118, 213 mg/L were obtained with the addition of 2.5 mM, 5 mM and 10 mM MVA, respectively. The cell growth has not been influenced significantly by the MVA additions (Fig. 3). The results showed that the increased isoprene productivity was in proportion to the content of mevalonate added. The maximum isoprene production of 213 mg/L was obtained with 10 mM mevalonate addition under flask condition. The results implied that the “lower pathway” was very efficient. Meanwhile, the functionality of the heterologous “upper pathway” was also under test. The results showed that overexpression of the synthetic operon of the “upper pathway” could only give a very low yield of MVA (0.026 mg/L). Based on the above-mentioned data, a conclusion could be reached that the “upper pathway” is the rate- limiting step of the whole MVA pathway.
Figure 3

Isoprene production of Strain YJM12.

The strain was cultured supplemented with different concentrations of mevalonate under flask conditions. The experiment was done in triplicate.

Isoprene production of Strain YJM12.

The strain was cultured supplemented with different concentrations of mevalonate under flask conditions. The experiment was done in triplicate.

Evaluation of Upper Pathway of MVA from Different Origins

To eliminate the limitation of upper pathway of MVA, alteration of the origins of the “upper pathway” of MVA might be a promising way. In the previous report, the mass production of mevalonate of 47 g/L was achieved by fed-batch culture of recombinant E. coli harboring mvaE and mvaS genes of E. faecalis [36]. Yoon also demonstrated that the mvaE and mvaS genes of E. faecalis were the most efficient for mevalonate production among the top MVA portions used in E. coli [22]. Therefore, the engineered strain YJM16 containing mvaS and mvaE gene from E. faecalis instead of “upper pathway” from S. cerevisiae was constructed in this study. The strain YJM16 was inoculated in 50 ml fermentation medium and incubated at 37°C. When OD600 of the bacterial culture reached 0.6, IPTG was added to a final concentration of 0.5 mM, and the culture was further incubated for 24 h. MVA was isolated from fermentation broth as described method. The strain YJM16 containing the mvaS and mvaE gene from E. faecalis could accumulate MVA up to 1.31 g/L, which was about fifty-fold in contrast to the strain YJM11 containing S. cerevisiae’s upper pathway (0.026 mg/L). Obviously, the upper pathway from E. faecalis proves to be more effective than that from S. cerevisiae.

The Effect of Mutation of mvaS Gene on MVA Production

The mvaS gene encodes the HMG-CoA synthase, the second enzyme in the MVA pathway, which catalyzes three molecules of acetyl-CoA to HMG-CoA and plays a key role in isoprenoid formation in the eukaryotic cytosol and in Gram-positive bacteria [37]. Steussy has reported that the overall reaction rate of the enzyme was increased 140-fold by mutating alanine 110 of HMG-CoA synthase from E. faecalis into a glycine [33]. Hence, a hypothesis would be put forward that the engineered strain with the mutated mvaS gene and mvaE from E. faecalis could further enhance the MVA production. To verify the effect of mutation of mvaS gene on MVA production, the recombinant strains YJM17 (E. coli harboring mvaS & mvaE) and YJM16 (E. coli containing mvaS & mvaE) were cultured in fermentation medium under shake-flask conditions. The amount of MVA accumulated in the culture media from different recombinant strains was calculated according to a standard curve plotted with a set of known concentrations of MVA. MVA concentration of the strain YJM17 reached around 3.1 g/L after being induced by 0.5 mM IPTG for 24 h, about 2.37 times higher than that of the strain YJM16 (1.31 g/L)(Fig. 4). The result demonstrated that A110G mutation of mvaS gene caused an appreciable increase in MVA production.
Figure 4

MVA production by strains with or without mutation of mvaS gene.

The MVA isolated from cultural broth as described in “MVA quantification by gas chromatography (GC)”. The experiment was performed in triplicate.

MVA production by strains with or without mutation of mvaS gene.

The MVA isolated from cultural broth as described in “MVA quantification by gas chromatography (GC)”. The experiment was performed in triplicate.

The Effect of Optimized Upper Pathway on Isoprene Production

To test the function of optimized upper pathway on isoprene production, the plasmid pYJM14 containing the lower pathway from S. cerevisiae was transformed into the strains (E. coli harboring mvaS & mvaE, mvaS & mvaE), which formed the recombinant strains YJM21 and YJM20, respectively. Both of the strains YJM21 and YJM20 were inoculated into the medium under the shake-flask conditions and the cultures were induced with 0.5 mM IPTG when the OD600 reached 0.6–0.9. As is shown in Fig. 5, isoprene produced by the strain YJM21 reached 760 mg/L, which was about 1.5 fold to the control strain YJM20 (500 mg/L). The result showed that the optimized upper pathway played an important role in improving the isoprene production.
Figure 5

Comparison of isoprene production from different recombinant strains.

The experiment was conducted under flask conditions in triplicate.

Comparison of isoprene production from different recombinant strains.

The experiment was conducted under flask conditions in triplicate.

The time course of isoprene production by YJM25.

Isoprene accumulation (▪) and cell growth (Δ) in YJM25, Induction was carried out at an OD600 of 12. Other experiment conditions were described in ‘Fed-batch fermentation’.

Comparison of Isoprene Production in Different E. coli Host Strains

To choose a most efficient host strain for isoprene production, plasmids pYJM20 and pYJM21 were transformed into E. coli host strains JM109 (DE3), BL21 (DE3) and BL21 star™ (DE3) carrying plasmid pYJM14, respectively. As shown in the Table 2, BL21 star™ (DE3) produced more isoprene than BL21 (DE3), while the yield of isoprene produced by JM109 (DE3) was the lowest among three strains. Obviously, BL21 star™ (DE3) was the most suitable host to produce isoprene. No significant difference in cell growth was observed for all these strains.
Table 2

Isoprene production by different E. coli strains harboring pYJM14 and pYJM20 or pYJM14 and pYJM21 under flask conditions.

HostPlasmids
pYJM14,pYJM20pYJM14,pYJM21
E.coli BL21(DE3)502 mg/L760 mg/L
E.coli BL21 Start™ (DE3)788 mg/L1091 mg/L
E.coli JM109(DE3)32 mg/L55 mg/L

The experiment was done in triplicate.

The experiment was done in triplicate.

Fed-batch Culture of Metabolically Engineered E. coli Strains

To further confirm the effectiveness of the optimized MVA pathway on increasing isoprene production, fed-batch cultivation was carried out using the recombinant E. coli BL21™(DE3) strain simultaneously harboring plasmids pYJM21 and pYJM14. After depletion of the glucose added initially, glucose (800 g l−1) was fed and the residual glucose was maintained below 0.5 g/l to minimize acetic acid accumulation. As is shown in Fig. 6, isoprene was produced in a growth associated manner in the fed-batch phase to reach maximum concentration of 6.3 g l−1 after 40 h of cultivation. The conversion efficiency of glucose to isoprene in the metabolically engineered strain has attained 7%, reaching 28% of the theoretical limit (25.2%). The theoretical yield was calculated according to the following formula [13]:
Figure 6

The time course of isoprene production by YJM25.

Isoprene accumulation (▪) and cell growth (Δ) in YJM25, Induction was carried out at an OD600 of 12. Other experiment conditions were described in ‘Fed-batch fermentation’.

1.5C6H12O6+2NADPH+6NAD+→C5H8+4CO2+6NADH+2NADP++H2O+4[H]. Expressing the optimized MVA pathway and isoprene synthase from P. alba resulted in approximately a 12-fold increase in isoprene production compared with our previous data achieved by expression of the MVA pathway from S. cerevisiae and isoprene synthase in the same host strain. In spite of the great progress for isoprene production made in E. coli, some problems still remained unsolved and were expected to be tackled before commercial production. For instance, the instability of the recombinant strain remains to be a severe problem due to the plasmid instability which in turn restricts the industrial application to a large extent. From metabolic engineering perspective, the stability of strain can be improved by genetic manipulation of chromosome integration technique [38], [39]. From the fermentation process aspect, immobilization of microbial cells may enhance the stability of engineered stain during the process of production [40], [41].

Conclusions

In this paper, the efficiency of the MVA pathway on isoprene production has largely been improved by changing the source of “upper pathway” of MVA synthesis from S. cerevisiae to E. faecalis and mutating the mvaS gene. In the final engineered strain YJM25 (E. coli BL21™(DE3)/pYJM21, pYJM14) containing the optimized MVA pathway and isoprene synthase, it can accumulated isoprene up to 6.3 g/L after 40 h fed-batch fermentation. The conversion efficiency of glucose to isoprene (gram to gram) in the metabolically engineered strain has attained 7%, reaching 28% of the theoretical limit. These results proved to be the highest isoprene productivity reported so far [7], [29], [42].
  29 in total

Review 1.  Elucidation of the methylerythritol phosphate pathway for isoprenoid biosynthesis in bacteria and plastids. A metabolic milestone achieved through genomics.

Authors:  Manuel Rodríguez-Concepción; Albert Boronat
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Creating isoprenoid diversity.

Authors:  J C Sacchettini; C D Poulter
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-09-19       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Isoprenoid biosynthesis in bacteria: a novel pathway for the early steps leading to isopentenyl diphosphate.

Authors:  M Rohmer; M Knani; P Simonin; B Sutter; H Sahm
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1993-10-15       Impact factor: 3.857

4.  Escherichia coli engineered to synthesize isopentenyl diphosphate and dimethylallyl diphosphate from mevalonate: a novel system for the genetic analysis of the 2-C-methyl-d-erythritol 4-phosphate pathway for isoprenoid biosynthesis.

Authors:  N Campos; M Rodríguez-Concepción; S Sauret-Güeto; F Gallego; L M Lois; A Boronat
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 3.857

5.  Production of mevalonate by a metabolically-engineered Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Kazuhiko Tabata; Shin-Ichi Hashimoto
Journal:  Biotechnol Lett       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.461

Review 6.  Production of rubber-like polymers by microorganisms.

Authors:  Alexander Steinbüchel
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.934

Review 7.  Biosynthesis of isoprenoids via the non-mevalonate pathway.

Authors:  W Eisenreich; A Bacher; D Arigoni; F Rohdich
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 8.  The MEP pathway: a new target for the development of herbicides, antibiotics and antimalarial drugs.

Authors:  M Rodríguez-Concepción
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.116

9.  Engineering a mevalonate pathway in Escherichia coli for production of terpenoids.

Authors:  Vincent J J Martin; Douglas J Pitera; Sydnor T Withers; Jack D Newman; Jay D Keasling
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2003-06-01       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  In vitro assembly of multiple DNA fragments using successive hybridization.

Authors:  Xinglin Jiang; Jianming Yang; Haibo Zhang; Huibin Zou; Cong Wang; Mo Xian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  50 in total

Review 1.  Metabolic engineering of strains: from industrial-scale to lab-scale chemical production.

Authors:  Jie Sun; Hal S Alper
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 2.  Next generation biofuel engineering in prokaryotes.

Authors:  Luisa S Gronenberg; Ryan J Marcheschi; James C Liao
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 8.822

3.  Expression in Haloferax volcanii of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A synthase facilitates isolation and characterization of the active form of a key enzyme required for polyisoprenoid cell membrane biosynthesis in halophilic archaea.

Authors:  John C VanNice; D Andrew Skaff; Gerald J Wyckoff; Henry M Miziorko
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 4.  Metabolic engineering and synthetic biology for isoprenoid production in Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Govinda R Navale; Mahesh S Dharne; Sandip S Shinde
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 5.  MICROBIAL isoprene production: an overview.

Authors:  Jasmine Isar; Dharmendra Jain; Harshvardhan Joshi; Shrikant Dhoot; Vidhya Rangaswamy
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Scalable production of mechanically tunable block polymers from sugar.

Authors:  Mingyong Xiong; Deborah K Schneiderman; Frank S Bates; Marc A Hillmyer; Kechun Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Gene replacement and elimination using λRed- and FLP-based tool to re-direct carbon flux in acetogen biocatalyst during continuous CO₂/H₂ blend fermentation.

Authors:  Michael Tyurin
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 3.346

8.  Engineering an isoprenoid pathway in Escherichia coli for production of 2-methyl-3-buten-2-ol: a potential biofuel.

Authors:  Dinesh Gupta; Michael L Summers; Chhandak Basu
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.695

9.  Boosting the free fatty acid synthesis of Escherichia coli by expression of a cytosolic Acinetobacter baylyi thioesterase.

Authors:  Yanning Zheng; Lingling Li; Qiang Liu; Wen Qin; Jianming Yang; Yujin Cao; Xinglin Jiang; Guang Zhao; Mo Xian
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 6.040

Review 10.  Consolidated Bioprocessing: Synthetic Biology Routes to Fuels and Fine Chemicals.

Authors:  Alec Banner; Helen S Toogood; Nigel S Scrutton
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-05-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.