Literature DB >> 24699093

Effects of gadolinium contrast agent administration on automatic brain tissue classification of patients with multiple sclerosis.

J B M Warntjes1, A Tisell2, A-M Landtblom3, P Lundberg4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The administration of gadolinium contrast agent is a common part of MR imaging examinations in patients with MS. The presence of gadolinium may affect the outcome of automated tissue classification. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of the presence of gadolinium on the automatic segmentation in patients with MS by using the synthetic tissue-mapping method.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of 20 patients with clinically definite multiple sclerosis were recruited, and the T1 and T2 relaxation times and proton density were simultaneously quantified before and after the administration of gadolinium. Synthetic tissue-mapping was used to measure white matter, gray matter, CSF, brain parenchymal, and intracranial volumes. For comparison, 20 matched controls were measured twice, without gadolinium.
RESULTS: No differences were observed for the control group between the 2 measurements. For the MS group, significant changes were observed pre- and post-gadolinium in intracranial volume (-13 mL, P < .005) and cerebrospinal fluid volume (-16 mL, P < .005) and the remaining, unclassified non-WM/GM/CSF tissue volume within the intracranial volume (+8 mL, P < .05). The changes in the patient group were much smaller than the differences, compared with the controls, which were -129 mL for WM volume, -22 mL for GM volume, +91 mL for CSF volume, 24 mL for the remaining, unclassified non-WM/GM/CSF tissue volume within the intracranial volume, and -126 mL for brain parenchymal volume. No significant differences were observed for linear regression values against age and Expanded Disability Status Scale.
CONCLUSIONS: The administration of gadolinium contrast agent had a significant effect on automatic brain-tissue classification in patients with MS by using synthetic tissue-mapping. The observed differences, however, were much smaller than the group differences between MS and controls.
© 2014 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24699093      PMCID: PMC7966571          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3890

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  33 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance image tissue classification using a partial volume model.

Authors:  D W Shattuck; S R Sandor-Leahy; K A Schaper; D A Rottenberg; R M Leahy
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 2.  Normal-appearing white matter changes in multiple sclerosis: the contribution of magnetic resonance techniques.

Authors:  M Filippi; C Tortorella; M Bozzali
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 6.312

Review 3.  The clinico-radiological paradox in multiple sclerosis revisited.

Authors:  Frederik Barkhof
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.710

4.  Novel whole brain segmentation and volume estimation using quantitative MRI.

Authors:  J West; J B M Warntjes; P Lundberg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Is multiple sclerosis a generalized disease of the central nervous system? An MRI perspective.

Authors:  Declan Chard; David Miller
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.710

6.  Measures of brain morphology and infarction in the framingham heart study: establishing what is normal.

Authors:  Charles DeCarli; Joseph Massaro; Danielle Harvey; John Hald; Mats Tullberg; Rhoda Au; Alexa Beiser; Ralph D'Agostino; Philip A Wolf
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.673

7.  Automatic volumetric measurement of segmented brain structures on magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Kazunari Ishii; Tsutomu Soma; Atsushi K Kono; Hiroki Sasaki; Naokazu Miyamoto; Tetsuya Fukuda; Kenya Murase
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2006-07

Review 8.  Segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions in MR images: a review.

Authors:  Daryoush Mortazavi; Abbas Z Kouzani; Hamid Soltanian-Zadeh
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Comparative reliability of total intracranial volume estimation methods and the influence of atrophy in a longitudinal semantic dementia cohort.

Authors:  George Pengas; João M S Pereira; Guy B Williams; Peter J Nestor
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2008-05-19       Impact factor: 2.486

10.  Brain atrophy in clinically early relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  D T Chard; C M Griffin; G J M Parker; R Kapoor; A J Thompson; D H Miller
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  9 in total

1.  Quantitative MRI for Analysis of Active Multiple Sclerosis Lesions without Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent.

Authors:  I Blystad; I Håkansson; A Tisell; J Ernerudh; Ö Smedby; P Lundberg; E-M Larsson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Gadolinium effect on thalamus and whole brain tissue segmentation.

Authors:  Salem Hannoun; Marwa Baalbaki; Ribal Haddad; Stephanie Saaybi; Nabil K El Ayoubi; Bassem I Yamout; Samia J Khoury; Roula Hourani
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Clinical Feasibility of Synthetic MRI in Multiple Sclerosis: A Diagnostic and Volumetric Validation Study.

Authors:  T Granberg; M Uppman; F Hashim; C Cananau; L E Nordin; S Shams; J Berglund; Y Forslin; P Aspelin; S Fredrikson; M Kristoffersen-Wiberg
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 4.  Brain Parenchymal Fraction in Healthy Adults-A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Mattias Vågberg; Gabriel Granåsen; Anders Svenningsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  SyMRI of the Brain: Rapid Quantification of Relaxation Rates and Proton Density, With Synthetic MRI, Automatic Brain Segmentation, and Myelin Measurement.

Authors:  Akifumi Hagiwara; Marcel Warntjes; Masaaki Hori; Christina Andica; Misaki Nakazawa; Kanako Kunishima Kumamaru; Osamu Abe; Shigeki Aoki
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 6.016

6.  Conventional and synthetic MRI in multiple sclerosis: a comparative study.

Authors:  Wolfgang Krauss; Martin Gunnarsson; Margareta Nilsson; Per Thunberg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  The effect of gadolinium-based contrast-agents on automated brain atrophy measurements by FreeSurfer in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Ingrid Anne Lie; Emma Kerklingh; Kristin Wesnes; David R van Nederpelt; Iman Brouwer; Øivind Torkildsen; Kjell-Morten Myhr; Frederik Barkhof; Lars Bø; Hugo Vrenken
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 7.034

8.  Application of Synthetic MRI for Direct Measurement of Magnetic Resonance Relaxation Time and Tumor Volume at Multiple Time Points after Contrast Administration: Preliminary Results in Patients with Brain Metastasis.

Authors:  Koung Mi Kang; Seung Hong Choi; Moonjung Hwang; Roh-Eul Yoo; Tae Jin Yun; Ji-Hoon Kim; Chul-Ho Sohn
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.500

9.  Age-Related Changes in Relaxation Times, Proton Density, Myelin, and Tissue Volumes in Adult Brain Analyzed by 2-Dimensional Quantitative Synthetic Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Akifumi Hagiwara; Kotaro Fujimoto; Koji Kamagata; Syo Murata; Ryusuke Irie; Hideyoshi Kaga; Yuki Someya; Christina Andica; Shohei Fujita; Shimpei Kato; Issei Fukunaga; Akihiko Wada; Masaaki Hori; Yoshifumi Tamura; Ryuzo Kawamori; Hirotaka Watada; Shigeki Aoki
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 10.065

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.