Literature DB >> 22555469

Single-item electronic administration of the SF-36v2 Health Survey.

Diane M Turner-Bowker1, Renee N Saris-Baglama, Michael A Derosa.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the psychometric properties and factor structure of a computerized electronic version of the SF-36v2 Health Survey (SF-36v2) with items administered one-per-page versus the traditional grid format used in the paper-and-pencil version in a sample of physician-diagnosed headache patients.
METHODS: Patients (N = 180) completed the SF-36v2 administered as part of a broader study of health outcomes. Scaling assumptions, reliability, factor structure, and the tool's ability to discriminate between headache pain severity groups were examined.
RESULTS: Frequency distributions showed notable ceiling effects for the role emotional, social functioning, physical functioning, and role physical scales, but negligible (<1.2%) floor effects for any of the scales. Internal consistency reliability coefficients ranged from 0.81 to 0.95 for the eight health domains. Items passed tests of internal consistency and discriminant validity. Principal components' analyses confirmed the 2-factor structure; the pattern of correlations across scales was consistent with expectations for the physical and mental health components. As expected, patients with severe headache pain had lower mean SF-36v2 scores than those with mild or moderate pain. No significant score differences were observed between mild and moderate pain severity groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Single-item electronic administration of the SF-36v2 is reliable and valid for use with headache patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22555469     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-012-0169-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  5 in total

Review 1.  Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with migraine.

Authors:  W J Becker
Journal:  Can J Neurol Sci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.104

2.  Design effects in the transition to web-based surveys.

Authors:  Don A Dillman; Jolene D Smyth
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report.

Authors:  Stephen Joel Coons; Chad J Gwaltney; Ron D Hays; J Jason Lundy; Jeff A Sloan; Dennis A Revicki; William R Lenderking; David Cella; Ethan Basch
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 5.725

5.  Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Chad J Gwaltney; Alan L Shields; Saul Shiffman
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.725

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Health-related quality of life and depression among medical sales representatives in Pakistan.

Authors:  Muhammad Atif; Arslan Bashir; Quratulain Saleem; Rabia Hussain; Shane Scahill; Zaheer-Ud-Din Babar
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-07-11

2.  The Swedish RAND-36 Health Survey - reliability and responsiveness assessed in patient populations using Svensson's method for paired ordinal data.

Authors:  Lotti Orwelius; Mats Nilsson; Evalill Nilsson; Marika Wenemark; Ulla Walfridsson; Mats Lundström; Charles Taft; Bo Palaszewski; Margareta Kristenson
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2018-02-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.