Literature DB >> 17466824

Design effects in the transition to web-based surveys.

Don A Dillman1, Jolene D Smyth.   

Abstract

Innovation within survey modes should always be mitigated by concerns about survey quality and in particular sampling, coverage, nonresponse, and measurement error. This is as true today with the development of web surveying as it was in the 1970s when telephone surveying was being developed. This paper focuses on measurement error in web surveys. Although Internet technology provides significant opportunities for innovation in survey design, systematic research has yet to be conducted on how most of the possible innovations might affect measurement error, leaving many survey designers "out in the cold." This paper summarizes recent research to provide an overview of how choosing the web mode affects the asking and answering of questions. It starts with examples of how question formats used in other survey modes perform differently in the web mode. It then provides examples of how the visual design of web surveys can influence answers in unexpected ways and how researchers can strategically use visual design to get respondents to provide their answers in a desired format. Finally, the paper concludes with suggested guidelines for web survey design.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17466824     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  35 in total

1.  Comparison of telephone with World Wide Web-based responses by parents and teens to a follow-up survey after injury.

Authors:  Frederick P Rivara; Thomas D Koepsell; Jin Wang; Dennis Durbin; Kenneth M Jaffe; Monica Vavilala; Andrea Dorsch; Maria Roper-Caldbeck; Eileen Houseknecht; Nancy Temkin
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  California hospitals response to state and federal policies related to health care-associated infections.

Authors:  Patricia W Stone; Monika Pogorzelska; Denise Graham; Haomiao Jia; Mayuko Uchida; Elaine L Larson
Journal:  Policy Polit Nurs Pract       Date:  2011-05

3.  Online research in older adults: lessons learned from conducting an online randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Eun-Shim Nahm; Barker Bausell; Barbara Resnick; Barbara Covington; Patricia F Brennan; Rekha Mathews; Joon Ho Park
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 2.257

4.  Critical issues in eHealth research.

Authors:  Audie A Atienza; Bradford W Hesse; Timothy B Baker; David B Abrams; Barbara K Rimer; Robert T Croyle; Lindsey N Volckmann
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Advantages and limitations of web-based surveys: evidence from a child mental health survey.

Authors:  Einar Heiervang; Robert Goodman
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 4.328

6.  Conducting rapid, relevant research: lessons learned from the My Own Health Report project.

Authors:  Russell E Glasgow; Rodger S Kessler; Marcia G Ory; Dylan Roby; Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin; Alex Krist
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  How to assess a survey in surgery.

Authors:  Achilleas Thoma; Sylvie D Cornacchi; Forough Farrokhyar; Mohit Bhandari; Charlie H Goldsmith
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Certification in infection control matters: Impact of infection control department characteristics and policies on rates of multidrug-resistant infections.

Authors:  Monika Pogorzelska; Patricia W Stone; Elaine L Larson
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.918

9.  Assessment of response consistency and respective participant profiles in the Internet-based NutriNet-Santé Cohort.

Authors:  Valentina A Andreeva; Pilar Galan; Chantal Julia; Katia Castetbon; Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot; Serge Hercberg
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 10.  Assessing consumer responses to potential reduced-exposure tobacco products: a review of tobacco industry and independent research methods.

Authors:  Vaughan W Rees; Jennifer M Kreslake; K Michael Cummings; Richard J O'Connor; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Mark Parascandola; Peter G Shields; Gregory N Connolly
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.