Literature DB >> 22554747

Microdamage of the cortical bone during mini-implant insertion with self-drilling and self-tapping techniques: a randomized controlled trial.

Sumit Yadav1, Madhur Upadhyay, Sean Liu, Eugene Roberts, William P Neace, Ravindra Nanda.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this research was to evaluate microdamage accumulation after mini-implant placement by self-drilling (without a pilot hole) and self-tapping (screwed into a pilot hole) insertion techniques. The null hypothesis was that the mini-implant insertion technique would have no influence on microcrack accumulation and propagation in the cortical bones of the maxillae and mandibles of adult hounds.
METHODS: Mini-implants (n = 162; diameter, 1.6 mm; length, 6 mm) were placed in the maxillae and mandibles of 9 hounds (12-14 months old) with self-drilling and self-tapping insertion techniques. The techniques were randomly assigned to the left or the right side of each jaw. Each hound received 18 mini-implants (10 in the mandible, 8 in the maxilla). Histomorphometric parameters including total crack length and crack surface density were measured. The null hypothesis was rejected in favor of an alternate hypothesis: that the self-drilling technique results in more microdamage (microcracks) accumulation in the adjacent cortical bone in both the maxilla and the mandible immediately after mini-implant placement. A cluster level analysis was used to analyze the data on the outcome measured. Since the measurements were clustered within dogs, a paired-samples t test was used to analyze the average differences between insertion methods at both jaw locations. A significance level of 0.05 was used for both analyses.
RESULTS: The self-drilling technique resulted in greater total crack lengths in both the maxilla and the mandible (maxilla: mean difference, 18.70 ± 7.04 μm/mm(2); CI, 13.29-24.11; mandible: mean difference, 22.98 ± 6.43 μm/mm(2); CI, 18.04-27.93; P <0.05), higher crack surface density in both the maxilla and the mandible (maxilla: mean difference, 10.39 ± 9.16 μm/mm(2); CI, 3.34-17.43; mandible: mean difference, 11.28 ± 3.41 μm/mm(2); CI, 8.65-13.90; P <0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated greater microdamage in the cortical bones of adult hounds in both the maxilla and the mandible by the self-drilling insertion technique compared with the self-tapping technique.
Copyright © 2012 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22554747     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.12.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  12 in total

1.  Surface characteristics and mechanical behavior of retrieved orthodontic microimplants.

Authors:  Lu Lu; Hyo-Sang Park
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.066

2.  Histomorphometric analysis of microcrack healing after the installation of mini-implants.

Authors:  Soobin Shin; Pan-Soo Park; Seung-Hak Baek; Il-Hyung Yang
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.614

3.  Assessment of cortical bone microdamage following insertion of microimplants using optical coherence tomography: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Hemanth Tumkur Lakshmikantha; Naresh Kumar Ravichandran; Mansik Jeon; Jeehyun Kim; Hyo-Sang Park
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2018 Nov.       Impact factor: 3.066

4.  Biomechanical characteristics and reinsertion guidelines for retrieved orthodontic miniscrews.

Authors:  Chooryung J Chung; Kil-Young Jung; Yoon Jeong Choi; Kyung-Ho Kim
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Influence of late removal after treatment on the removal torque of microimplants.

Authors:  Ho-Jin Kim; Hyo-Sang Park
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 1.361

6.  Trabecular deformations during screw pull-out: a micro-CT study of lapine bone.

Authors:  Thomas Joffre; Per Isaksson; Philip Procter; Cecilia Persson
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2017-03-06

7.  Repair of microdamage in osteonal cortical bone adjacent to bone screw.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Tingjun Ye; Lianfu Deng; Jin Shao; Jin Qi; Qi Zhou; Li Wei; Shijing Qiu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Enhanced compatibility and initial stability of Ti6Al4V alloy orthodontic miniscrews subjected to anodization, cyclic precalcification, and heat treatment.

Authors:  Eun-Ju Oh; Thuy-Duong T Nguyen; Seung-Youp Lee; Young-Mi Jeon; Tae-Sung Bae; Jong-Gee Kim
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 1.372

9.  Torque Loss After Miniscrew Placement: An In-Vitro Study Followed by a Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Marco Migliorati; Sara Drago; Fabrizio Barberis; Irene Schiavetti; Domenico Dalessandri; Stefano Benedicenti; Armando Silvestrini Biavati
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2016-05-31

10.  Effects of recycling on the biomechanical characteristics of retrieved orthodontic miniscrews.

Authors:  Soon-Dong Yun; Sung-Hwan Choi; Jung-Yul Cha; Hyung-Seog Yu; Kwang-Mahn Kim; Jin Kim; Chung-Ju Hwang
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 1.372

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.