Literature DB >> 22553665

Confocal microscopic evaluation of cornea after AquaLase liquefaction cataract extraction.

Jiang-Yue Zhao1, Ming-Wu Wang, Qi Sun, Jin-Song Zhang.   

Abstract

AIM: The most recent and innovative AquaLase liquefaction technology has offered an alternative to lens extraction. Many studies have investigated its functions and advantages. This article focuses on evaluating the in vivo microscopic cornea changes after AquaLase liquefaction by using a laser confocal microscope.
METHODS: In this perspective, randomized case study, 37 eyes of 35 patients submitted to cataract surgery were chosen to undergo AquaLase liquefaction cataract extraction. Each patient was assessed before the operation, on the 1(st), 7(th), and 30(th) postoperative days, and 6 months after the cataract extraction. The morphologies and quantitative comparisons of corneal cells and corneal nerves layer by layer were evaluated in vivo with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph III-Rostock Cornea Module (HRT-III RCM) confocal microscope. ANOVA and Post-Hoc Bonferroni test were carried out to compare the results pre- and post-operation.
RESULTS: ANOVA results indicated no post-operation changes for epithelium and anterior stroma cells. Irregular segments of sub-basal nerve fiber were most pronounced seven days post-operation. In the mid and posterior stroma, keratocytes were obvious compared with the preoperative condition. Corneal endothelium cells became obviously swollen in cytoplasm and nucleus. The mid and posterior stroma cell density decreased from the 1(st) to 7(th) postoperative days (P<0.05). The corneal endothelium cell density decreased (P<0.05) and did not revert to the preoperative level after six months (P<0.05).
CONCLUSION: Slight microstructural abnormalities were identified in the corneal recovery process after AquaLase liquefaction. AquaLase liquefaction cataract extraction is safe for cornea.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aquaLase liquefaction; cataract; cornea changes

Year:  2011        PMID: 22553665      PMCID: PMC3340812          DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2011.03.17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  20 in total

Review 1.  New phacoemulsification technology.

Authors:  Richard S Hoffman; I Howard Fine; Mark Packer
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.761

2.  A survey about phacoemulsification incision thermal contraction incidence and causal relationships.

Authors:  Michael J Bradley; Randall J Olson
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Prospective randomized controlled trial to compare the effect on the macula of AquaLase liquefaction and ultrasound phacoemulsification cataract surgery.

Authors:  Allon Barsam; Aman Chandra; Catey Bunce; Laurence A Whitefield
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Phacoemulsification associated corneal damage evaluated by corneal volume.

Authors:  Hisaharu Suzuki; Hiroshi Takahashi; Junko Hori; Miki Hiraoka; Tsutomu Igarashi; Toshihiko Shiwa
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Postoperative corneal swelling correlates strongly to corneal endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification cataract surgery.

Authors:  Björn Lundberg; Maria Jonsson; Anders Behndig
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Surgically induced astigmatism after phacoemulsification in eyes with mild to moderate corneal astigmatism: temporal versus on-axis clear corneal incisions.

Authors:  Edmondo Borasio; Jodhbir S Mehta; Vincenzo Maurino
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.351

7.  Comparison of posterior capsule opacification after two different surgical methods of cataract extraction.

Authors:  Jana Nekolová; Jana Pozlerová; Nada Jirásková; Pavel Rozsíval; Jana Kadlecová
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Corneal oedema after cataract surgery: predisposing factors and corneal graft outcome.

Authors:  Margareta Claesson; W John Armitage; Ulf Stenevi
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 3.761

9.  One-year outcomes of AquaLase cataract surgery.

Authors:  Sonia H Yoo; Anand B Bhatt
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr

10.  Development of an in vitro model to assess posterior capsule safety during phacoemulsification with ultrasound or AquaLase handpieces.

Authors:  Julie H Tsai; Christopher G Khng; Robert H Osher; Glenn R Sussman
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.351

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Liquefaction for cataract extraction.

Authors:  Georgios Labiris; Aspasia Toli; Damaskini Polychroni; Maria Gkika; Dimitrios Angelonias; Vassilios P Kozobolis
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.