Literature DB >> 22553304

Dilemmas concerning dose distribution and the influence of relative biological effect in proton beam therapy of medulloblastoma.

B Jones1, P Wilson, A Nagano, J Fenwick, G McKenna.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To improve medulloblastoma proton therapy. Although considered ideal for proton therapy, there are potential disadvantages. Expected benefits include reduced radiation-induced cancer and circulatory complications, while avoiding small brain volumes of dose in-homogeneity when compared with conventional X-rays. Several aspects of proton therapy might contribute to reduced tumour control due to (a) the use of more homogenous dose levels which can result in under-dosage, (b) differences in relative biological effectiveness (RBE) between that prescription RBE of 1.1 and the RBE of brain and spinal cord (likely to exceed 1.1) and in medulloblastoma cells (where RBE is likely to be below 1.1). Such changes, although speculative for RBE, might result in potential underdosage of tumour cells and a higher bio-effect in brain tissue.
METHODS: Dose distributions for X-ray and proton treatment are compared, with allocation of likely RBE values for fast growing medullolastoma cells and stable central nervous system tissue.
RESULTS: These physical and radiobiological factors are shown to combine to give a higher risk of tumour recurrence with further risks on tumour control when dose reduction schedules used for X-ray therapy are replicated for proton therapy for "low-risk" patients.
CONCLUSION: The dose distributions and prescribed doses of proton therapy, taking into account RBE, in children and adults with medulloblastoma, need to be reconsidered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22553304      PMCID: PMC3474038          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/24498486

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  17 in total

1.  A microdosimetric-kinetic model for the effect of non-Poisson distribution of lethal lesions on the variation of RBE with LET.

Authors:  Roland B Hawkins
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Calculation of high-LET radiotherapy dose required for compensation of overall treatment time extensions.

Authors:  B Jones; A Carabe-Fernandez; R G Dale
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  The apparent increase in the {beta}-parameter of the linear quadratic model with increased linear energy transfer during fast neutron irradiation.

Authors:  B Jones
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Measurements of relative biological effectiveness of the 70 MeV proton beam at TRIUMF using Chinese hamster V79 cells and the high-precision cell sorter assay.

Authors:  B G Wouters; G K Lam; U Oelfke; K Gardey; R E Durand; L D Skarsgard
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Fast neutron relative biological effects and implications for charged particle therapy.

Authors:  B Jones; T S A Underwood; A Carabe-Fernandez; C Timlin; R G Dale
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Treatment planning with protons for pediatric retinoblastoma, medulloblastoma, and pelvic sarcoma: how do protons compare with other conformal techniques?

Authors:  Catherine T Lee; Stephen D Bilton; Robin M Famiglietti; Beverly A Riley; Anita Mahajan; Eric L Chang; Moshe H Maor; Shiao Y Woo; James D Cox; Alfred R Smith
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values for proton beam therapy.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti; Andrzej Niemierko; Marek Ancukiewicz; Leo E Gerweck; Michael Goitein; Jay S Loeffler; Herman D Suit
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Medulloblastoma: time-dose relationship based on a 30-year review.

Authors:  J O del Charco; T W Bolek; W M McCollough; B L Maria; A Kedar; R C Braylan; J P Mickle; J M Buatti; N P Mendenhall; R B Marcus
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1998-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Advantage of protons compared to conventional X-ray or IMRT in the treatment of a pediatric patient with medulloblastoma.

Authors:  W H St Clair; J A Adams; M Bues; B C Fullerton; Sean La Shell; H M Kooy; J S Loeffler; N J Tarbell
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Significance and implementation of RBE variations in proton beam therapy.

Authors:  H Paganetti
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2003-10
View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Proton RBE dependence on dose in the setting of hypofractionation.

Authors:  Thomas Friedrich
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Proton beam therapy: the next disruptive innovation in healthcare?

Authors:  Samuel Swisher-McClure; Stephen M Hahn; Justin Bekelman
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 3.  Radiation oncology in the era of precision medicine.

Authors:  Michael Baumann; Mechthild Krause; Jens Overgaard; Jürgen Debus; Søren M Bentzen; Juliane Daartz; Christian Richter; Daniel Zips; Thomas Bortfeld
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 4.  Does Proton Therapy Have a Future in CNS Tumors?

Authors:  Stephanie E Combs
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.598

5.  Technique, outcomes, and acute toxicities in adults treated with proton beam craniospinal irradiation.

Authors:  Christian L Barney; Aaron P Brown; David R Grosshans; Mary Frances McAleer; John F de Groot; Vinay Puduvalli; Susan L Tucker; Cody N Crawford; Mark R Gilbert; Paul D Brown; Anita Mahajan
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 6.  Clinical controversies: proton therapy for pediatric tumors.

Authors:  Thomas E Merchant
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.934

7.  Clinical Outcomes Among Children With Standard-Risk Medulloblastoma Treated With Proton and Photon Radiation Therapy: A Comparison of Disease Control and Overall Survival.

Authors:  Bree R Eaton; Natia Esiashvili; Sungjin Kim; Elizabeth A Weyman; Lauren T Thornton; Claire Mazewski; Tobey MacDonald; David Ebb; Shannon M MacDonald; Nancy J Tarbell; Torunn I Yock
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 8.  National Cancer Institute Workshop on Proton Therapy for Children: Considerations Regarding Brainstem Injury.

Authors:  Daphne Haas-Kogan; Daniel Indelicato; Harald Paganetti; Natia Esiashvili; Anita Mahajan; Torunn Yock; Stella Flampouri; Shannon MacDonald; Maryam Fouladi; Kry Stephen; John Kalapurakal; Stephanie Terezakis; Hanne Kooy; David Grosshans; Mike Makrigiorgos; Kavita Mishra; Tina Young Poussaint; Kenneth Cohen; Thomas Fitzgerald; Vinai Gondi; Arthur Liu; Jeff Michalski; Dragan Mirkovic; Radhe Mohan; Stephanie Perkins; Kenneth Wong; Bhadrasain Vikram; Jeff Buchsbaum; Larry Kun
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Outcome and toxicity using helical tomotherapy for craniospinal irradiation in pediatric medulloblastoma.

Authors:  J L Lopez Guerra; I Marrone; J Jaen; M Bruna; C Sole; A Sanchez-Reyes; E Rivin; M J Ortiz; F Calvo; R Matute
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 3.405

10.  Proton Relative Biological Effectiveness - Uncertainties and Opportunities.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-09-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.