Literature DB >> 22552766

Mixing method affects elution and strength of high-dose ALBC: a pilot study.

Ryan Miller1, Alex McLaren, Christine Leon, Ryan McLemore.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High-dose antimicrobial-loaded bone cement (ALBC) is used to treat orthopaedic infections. High-dose ALBC is not commercially available and requires surgeon directed formulation, and there are several different methods used to mix high-dose ALBC. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked whether the mixing method affected antimicrobial elution and mechanical properties of high-dose ALBC.
METHODS: ALBC was formulated with Simplex P bone cement and 10 g of vancomycin per batch using one of three mixing methods: (1) hand-stirred using a standard bowl and spatula, (2) bowl-mixed using a mechanical mixing bowl, and (3) dough-phase mixing where the vancomycin was left in chunks (1-5 mm) and folded into the cement during the dough phase after adding the monomer. We eluted 45 standardized test cylinders (15 per mixing technique) for 30 days under infinite sink conditions. We tested 135 (45 per mixing method) similarly eluted cylinders in axial compression to failure.
RESULTS: Dough-phase mixing lead to greater antimicrobial delivery, but lower compressive strength than the hand-stirred or bowl-mixed methods. Dough-phase cement released 18,570 lg of vancomycin versus 11,731 for hand-stirred and 7700 μg for bowl mixed. Compressive strength for dough-phase mixing after 30 days of elution was 36 MPa, while both hand-stirred and bowl mixed cements were 56 MPa.
CONCLUSIONS: Performance of high-dose ALBC was affected by mixing method. Dough-phase mixing led to greater antimicrobial delivery, but caused greater loss in compressive strength.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22552766      PMCID: PMC3442001          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2351-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  16 in total

1.  Strength of antimicrobial bone cement decreases with increased poragen fraction.

Authors:  Matt Nugent; Alex McLaren; Brent Vernon; Ryan McLemore
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Practical applications of antibiotic-loaded bone cement for treatment of infected joint replacements.

Authors:  Arlen D Hanssen; Mark J Spangehl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Mixing does not improve mechanical properties of all bone cements. Manual and centrifugation-vacuum mixing compared for 10 cement brands.

Authors:  D Hansen; J S Jensen
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1992-02

4.  Mechanical properties of bone cements containing large doses of antibiotic powders.

Authors:  E P Lautenschlager; J J Jacobs; G W Marshall; P R Meyer
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1976-11

5.  Influence of antibiotic impregnation on the fatigue life of Simplex P and Palacos R acrylic bone cements, with and without centrifugation.

Authors:  J P Davies; D O O'Connor; D W Burke; W H Harris
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1989-04

6.  Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation on different gentamicin-loaded polymethylmethacrylate bone cements.

Authors:  H van de Belt; D Neut; W Schenk; J R van Horn; H C van Der Mei; H J Busscher
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  In vitro and in vivo evaluation of antibiotic diffusion from antibiotic-impregnated polymethylmethacrylate beads.

Authors:  K Adams; L Couch; G Cierny; J Calhoun; J T Mader
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Elution of vancomycin, daptomycin, and amikacin from acrylic bone cement.

Authors:  D K Kuechle; G C Landon; D M Musher; P C Noble
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Effect of vacuum mixing on the mechanical properties of antibiotic-impregnated polymethylmethacrylate bone cement.

Authors:  M J Askew; M F Kufel; P R Fleissner; I A Gradisar; S J Salstrom; J S Tan
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1990-05

10.  The effect of antibiotic additions on the fracture properties of bone cements.

Authors:  T M Wright; D J Sullivan; S P Arnoczky
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1984-08
View more
  13 in total

1.  Loading with vancomycin does not decrease gentamicin elution in gentamicin premixed bone cement.

Authors:  Sebastian P Boelch; Martin C Jordan; Joerg Arnholdt; Maximilian Rudert; Martin Luedemann; Andre F Steinert
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 2.  [Augmentation with antibiotic-impregnated spacers in sepsis revision surgery].

Authors:  I Flesch
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Voriconazole is delivered from antifungal-loaded bone cement.

Authors:  Ryan B Miller; Alex C McLaren; Christine Pauken; Henry D Clarke; Ryan McLemore
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  How Long Does Antimycobacterial Antibiotic-loaded Bone Cement Have In Vitro Activity for Musculoskeletal Tuberculosis?

Authors:  Jae Hoo Lee; Chang Dong Han; Sang-Nae Cho; Ick Hwan Yang; Woo Suk Lee; Seung-Hun Baek; Jae Won Shin; Khalid Elfadil Ibrahim Husein; Kwan Kyu Park
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Biomechanical comparison of tigecycline loaded bone cement with vancomycin and daptomycin loaded bone cements.

Authors:  Sedit Kıvanç Muratlı; Vasfi Karatosun; Bora Uzun; İzge Günal
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.511

6.  Antimicrobial distribution from local delivery depends on dose : a pilot study with MRI.

Authors:  Alex McLaren; Morgan B Giers; James Fraser; Luke Hosack; Michael R Caplan; Ryan McLemore
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Local gentamicin delivery from resorbable viscous hydrogels is therapeutically effective.

Authors:  Derek Overstreet; Alex McLaren; Francis Calara; Brent Vernon; Ryan McLemore
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Mechanical and elution properties of G3 Low Viscosity bone cement loaded up to three antibiotics.

Authors:  Giorgio Cacciola; Federico De Meo; Pietro Cavaliere
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-09-06

9.  Pearls: Mind the Gap! The Art of the Static Antibiotic-laden Cement Spacer.

Authors:  Ayesha Abdeen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 4.755

10.  Comparison of Elution Characteristics and Compressive Strength of Biantibiotic-Loaded PMMA Bone Cement for Spacers: Copal® Spacem with Gentamicin and Vancomycin versus Palacos® R+G with Vancomycin.

Authors:  Sebastian P Boelch; Kilian Rueckl; Clara Fuchs; Martin Jordan; Markus Knauer; Andre Steinert; Maximilian Rudert; Martin Luedemann
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.