Literature DB >> 22551671

CAD/CAM guided secondary mandibular reconstruction of a discontinuity defect after ablative cancer surgery.

Leonardo Ciocca1, Simona Mazzoni, Massimiliano Fantini, Franco Persiani, Claudio Marchetti, Roberto Scotti.   

Abstract

A surgical guide is projected to aid the repositioning of the mandibular segments in their original locations, and a reconstruction bone plate is provided to support the fibula free flap. Computer-aided mandibular reconstruction involves three steps: virtual surgical planning, CAD/CAM and rapid-prototyping procedures for the design and manufacture of the customised surgical device and surgery. The duration of the reconstructive phase (<1.5 h intraoperative time) was reduced in comparison with traditional secondary mandibular reconstruction. The bone plate permitted the maximal restoration of the original facial and mandibular contours and the more precise positioning of the residual mandibular ramus in comparison with conventional procedures. No complication was noted during the mean follow-up period of 12 months. The protocol presented in this paper offers some benefits: 1) The virtual environment permitted ideal preoperative planning of mandibular segment repositioning in secondary reconstruction; 2) Intraoperative time was not consumed by approximate and repeated bone plate modelling; 3) Using CT data obtained before primary surgery, the reconstruction bone plate was designed using the original external cortical bone as a template to reproduce the ideal mandibular contour; 4) Prototyped resin models of the bone defect allowed the surgeon to train preoperatively by simulating the surgery.
Copyright © 2012 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22551671     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.03.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  23 in total

1.  Pediatric facial transplantation: Ethical considerations.

Authors:  Jennifer Flynn; Randi Zlotnik Shaul; Mark D Hanson; Gregory H Borschel; Ronald Zuker
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.947

2.  Virtual planning of complex head and neck reconstruction results in satisfactory match between real outcomes and virtual models.

Authors:  Henning Hanken; Clemens Schablowsky; Ralf Smeets; Max Heiland; Susanne Sehner; Björn Riecke; Ibrahim Nourwali; Oliver Vorwig; Alexander Gröbe; Ahmed Al-Dam
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Masticatory rehabilitation following upper and lower jaw reconstruction using vascularised free fibula flap and enossal implants-19 years of experience with a comprehensive concept.

Authors:  Samer George Hakim; Harald Kimmerle; Thomas Trenkle; Peter Sieg; Hans-Christian Jacobsen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  Mini-plate versus reconstruction bar fixation for oncologic mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flaps: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nikhil Sobti; Kaleem S Ahmed; Thais Polanco; Marina Chilov; Marc A Cohen; Jay Boyle; Farooq Shahzad; Evan Matros; Jonas A Nelson; Robert J Allen
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 3.022

5.  Preparation and In Vitro Analysis of Craniofacial Titanium Implants Surfaces Produced by Additive 3D Printing and Conventional Manufacturing.

Authors:  Muhanad M Hatamleh
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2020-11-05

6.  Factors influencing CAD/CAM accuracy in fibula free flap mandibular reconstruction.

Authors:  Ahmed Hassan Sweed; Alessandro Remigio Bolzoni; Aleksandra Kadubiec; Giada Anna Beltramini; Alessandro Cherchi; Alessandro Baj
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.124

7.  Advantages of surgical simulation in the surgical reconstruction of oncological patients.

Authors:  F Iglesias-Martín; L-G Oliveros-López; A Fernández-Olavarría; M-A Serrera-Figallo; A Gutiérrez-Corrales; D Torres-Lagares; J-L Gutiérrez-Pérez
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2018-09-01

8.  Salvage Secondary Reconstruction of the Mandible with Vascularized Fibula Flap.

Authors:  Dinesh Kadam
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2019-03-29

9.  Improving mandibular reconstruction by using topology optimization, patient specific design and additive manufacturing?-A biomechanical comparison against miniplates on human specimen.

Authors:  Jan J Lang; Mirjam Bastian; Peter Foehr; Michael Seebach; Jochen Weitz; Constantin von Deimling; Benedikt J Schwaiger; Carina M Micheler; Nikolas J Wilhelm; Christian U Grosse; Marco Kesting; Rainer Burgkart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Recurrent Convolutional Neural Networks for 3D Mandible Segmentation in Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Bingjiang Qiu; Jiapan Guo; Joep Kraeima; Haye Hendrik Glas; Weichuan Zhang; Ronald J H Borra; Max Johannes Hendrikus Witjes; Peter M A van Ooijen
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-05-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.