Literature DB >> 9823085

Conventional glass ionomers as posterior restorations. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry.

M A Naasan1, T F Watson.   

Abstract

The search for a material to replace amalgam continues as a major quest in materials science. Resin composites may offer one solution but an alternative class of material, the glass ionomer cements (GICs) may have some potential for fulfilling this role. GICs were first introduced to the dental profession in 1976, and have now become an accepted part of the dental armamentarium, especially for use in low load bearing situations. They possess a low coefficient of thermal expansion similar to that of tooth structure, physicochemical bonding to both enamel and dentin, and the release of fluoride ions into the adjacent tooth tissue. These properties help to reduce marginal leakage and may contribute to a reduced incidence of recurrent decay in the restored tooth. Fluoride released into the ambient fluids has a caries-preventive effect in neighboring teeth by enhancing remineralization and inhibiting demineralization of the dental hard tissues. The main criticisms of the GICs are their brittleness, poor surface polish, porosity and surface wear. To overcome some of these deficiencies, considerable attention has been directed at improving their physical properties, especially with the addition of metal powders, the metal-modified GICs. Different metal powders have been tried, including alloys of silver and tin, pure silver, gold, titanium, palladium and stainless steel. There is conflicting data as to whether or not these materials are sufficiently strong for use in high stress restorations, especially their potential use as replacement materials for amalgam fillings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9823085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Dent        ISSN: 0894-8275            Impact factor:   1.522


  15 in total

1.  Evaluation of a conventional glass ionomer cement with new zinc formulation: effect of coating, aging and storage agents.

Authors:  Julius Zoergiebel; Nicoleta Ilie
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Physical properties of different orthodontic cements.

Authors:  Sertac Aksakalli; Meral Arslan Malkoc; Bayram Corekci; Siddik Malkoc; Ebubekir Toy
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Clinical performance of a glass ionomer restorative system: a 6-year evaluation.

Authors:  Sevil Gurgan; Zeynep Bilge Kutuk; Esra Ergin; Sema Seval Oztas; Filiz Yalcin Cakir
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Fracture toughness of dental restorative materials.

Authors:  Nicoleta Ilie; Reinhard Hickel; Anca Silvia Valceanu; Karin Christine Huth
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Failure of a glass ionomer to remineralize apatite-depleted dentin.

Authors:  Y K Kim; C K Y Yiu; J R Kim; L Gu; S K Kim; R N Weller; D H Pashley; F R Tay
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 6.116

6.  Microleakage after Thermocycling of Three Self-Etch Adhesives under Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Restorations.

Authors:  Sabine O Geerts; Laurence Seidel; Adelin I Albert; Audrey M Gueders
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2010-06-06

7.  Cytotoxicity evaluation of a new fast set highly viscous conventional glass ionomer cement with L929 fibroblast cell line.

Authors:  Hany Mohamed Aly Ahmed; Nor Shamsuria Omar; Norhayati Luddin; Rajan Saini; Deepti Saini
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2011-10

8.  Shear bond strength of Biodentine, ProRoot MTA, glass ionomer cement and composite resin on human dentine ex vivo.

Authors:  Markus Kaup; Christoph Heinrich Dammann; Edgar Schäfer; Till Dammaschke
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 2.151

9.  Do Laboratory Results Concerning High-Viscosity Glass-Ionomers versus Amalgam for Tooth Restorations Indicate Similar Effect Direction and Magnitude than that of Controlled Clinical Trials? - A Meta-Epidemiological Study.

Authors:  Steffen Mickenautsch; Veerasamy Yengopal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Are high-viscosity glass-ionomer cements inferior to silver amalgam as restorative materials for permanent posterior teeth? A Bayesian analysis.

Authors:  Steffen Mickenautsch
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 2.757

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.