Nikolaos Kartalis1, Louiza Loizou, Nick Edsborg, Ralf Segersvärd, Nils Albiin. 1. Division of Medical Imaging and Technology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, 141 86, Stockholm, Sweden. nikolaos.kartalis@karolinska.se
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare respiratory-triggered, free-breathing, and breath-hold DWI techniques regarding (1) image quality, and (2) signal intensity (SI) and ADC measurements in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: Fifteen patients with histopathologically proven PDAC underwent DWI prospectively at 1.5 T (b = 0, 50, 300, 600 and 1,000 s/mm(2)) with the three techniques. Two radiologists, independently and blindly, assigned total image quality scores [sum of rating diffusion images (lesion detection, anatomy, presence of artefacts) and ADC maps (lesion characterisation, overall image quality)] per technique and ranked them. The lesion SI, signal-to-noise ratio, mean ADC and coefficient of variation (CV) were compared. RESULTS: Total image quality scores for respiratory-triggered, free-breathing and breath-hold techniques were 17.9, 16.5 and 17.1 respectively (respiratory-triggered was significantly higher than free-breathing but not breath-hold). The respiratory-triggered technique had a significantly higher ranking. Lesion SI on all b-values and signal-to-noise ratio on b300 and b600 were significantly higher for the respiratory-triggered technique. For respiratory-triggered, free-breathing and breath-hold techniques the mean ADCs were 1.201, 1.132 and 1.253 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s, and mean CVs were 8.9, 10.8 and 14.1 % respectively (respiratory-triggered and free-breathing techniques had a significantly lower mean CV than the breath-hold technique). CONCLUSION: In both analyses, respiratory-triggered DWI showed superiority and seems the optimal DWI technique for demonstrating PDAC. KEY POINTS : • Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging is increasingly used to detect pancreatic cancer • Images are acquired using various breathing techniques and multiple b-values • Breathing techniques used: respiratory-triggering, free-breathing and breath-hold • Respiratory-triggering seems the optimal breathing technique for demonstrating pancreatic cancer.
OBJECTIVES: To compare respiratory-triggered, free-breathing, and breath-hold DWI techniques regarding (1) image quality, and (2) signal intensity (SI) and ADC measurements in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: Fifteen patients with histopathologically proven PDAC underwent DWI prospectively at 1.5 T (b = 0, 50, 300, 600 and 1,000 s/mm(2)) with the three techniques. Two radiologists, independently and blindly, assigned total image quality scores [sum of rating diffusion images (lesion detection, anatomy, presence of artefacts) and ADC maps (lesion characterisation, overall image quality)] per technique and ranked them. The lesion SI, signal-to-noise ratio, mean ADC and coefficient of variation (CV) were compared. RESULTS: Total image quality scores for respiratory-triggered, free-breathing and breath-hold techniques were 17.9, 16.5 and 17.1 respectively (respiratory-triggered was significantly higher than free-breathing but not breath-hold). The respiratory-triggered technique had a significantly higher ranking. Lesion SI on all b-values and signal-to-noise ratio on b300 and b600 were significantly higher for the respiratory-triggered technique. For respiratory-triggered, free-breathing and breath-hold techniques the mean ADCs were 1.201, 1.132 and 1.253 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s, and mean CVs were 8.9, 10.8 and 14.1 % respectively (respiratory-triggered and free-breathing techniques had a significantly lower mean CV than the breath-hold technique). CONCLUSION: In both analyses, respiratory-triggered DWI showed superiority and seems the optimal DWI technique for demonstrating PDAC. KEY POINTS : • Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging is increasingly used to detect pancreatic cancer • Images are acquired using various breathing techniques and multiple b-values • Breathing techniques used: respiratory-triggering, free-breathing and breath-hold • Respiratory-triggering seems the optimal breathing technique for demonstrating pancreatic cancer.
Authors: Ihab R Kamel; Eleni Liapi; Diane K Reyes; Marianna Zahurak; David A Bluemke; Jean-François H Geschwind Journal: Radiology Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Thomas C Kwee; Taro Takahara; Dow-Mu Koh; Rutger A J Nievelstein; Peter R Luijten Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Dow-Mu Koh; Erica Scurr; David Collins; Baris Kanber; Andrew Norman; Martin O Leach; Janet E Husband Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Lorenzo Mannelli; Sooah Kim; Cristina H Hajdu; James S Babb; Timothy W I Clark; Bachir Taouli Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Riccardo De Robertis; Paolo Tinazzi Martini; Emanuele Demozzi; Flavia Dal Corso; Claudio Bassi; Paolo Pederzoli; Mirko D'Onofrio Journal: World J Radiol Date: 2015-10-28
Authors: A-H Penner; A M Sprinkart; G M Kukuk; I Gütgemann; J Gieseke; H H Schild; W A Willinek; P Mürtz Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2013-05-11 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: N P Jerome; M R Orton; J A d'Arcy; T Feiweier; N Tunariu; D-M Koh; M O Leach; D J Collins Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2015-01-05 Impact factor: 3.609