Literature DB >> 22548907

Improved surgical safety after laparoscopic compared to open surgery for apparent early stage endometrial cancer: results from a randomised controlled trial.

Andreas Obermair1, Monika Janda, Jannah Baker, Srinivas Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan, Alison Brand, Russell Hogg, Thomas W Jobling, Russell Land, Tom Manolitsas, Marcelo Nascimento, Deborah Neesham, James L Nicklin, Martin K Oehler, Geoff Otton, Lewis Perrin, Stuart Salfinger, Ian Hammond, Yee Leung, Peter Sykes, Hextan Ngan, Andrea Garrett, Michael Laney, Tong Yow Ng, Karfai Tam, Karen Chan, David H Wrede, Selvan Pather, Bryony Simcock, Rhonda Farrell, Gregory Robertson, Graeme Walker, Anthony McCartney, Val Gebski.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy (TLH) and Total Abdominal Hysterectomy (TAH) with regard to surgical safety.
METHODS: Between October 2005 and June 2010, 760 patients with apparent early stage endometrial cancer were enroled in a multicentre, randomised clinical trial (LACE) comparing outcomes following TLH or TAH. The main study end points for this analysis were surgical adverse events (AE), hospital length of stay, conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy, including 753 patients who completed at least 6 weeks of follow-up. Postoperative AEs were graded according to Common Toxicity Criteria (V3), and those immediately life-threatening, requiring inpatient hospitalisation or prolonged hospitalisation, or resulting in persistent or significant disability/incapacity were regarded as serious AEs.
RESULTS: The incidence of intra-operative AEs was comparable in either group. The incidence of post-operative AE CTC grade 3+ (18.6% in TAH, 12.9% in TLH, p 0.03) and serious AE (14.3% in TAH, 8.2% in TLH, p 0.007) was significantly higher in the TAH group compared to the TLH group. Mean operating time was 132 and 107 min, and median length of hospital stay was 2 and 5 days in the TLH and TAH group, respectively (p<0.0001). The decline of haemoglobin from baseline to day 1 postoperatively was 2g/L less in the TLH group (p 0.006).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to TAH, TLH is associated with a significantly decreased risk of major surgical AEs. A laparoscopic surgical approach to early stage endometrial cancer is safe.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22548907     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.02.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  23 in total

1.  Prospective Nonrandomized Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgical Staging for Endometrial Cancer in India.

Authors:  Vikash Mahajan
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-03-16

Review 2.  Robotic surgery for gynaecologic cancer: an overview.

Authors:  René Verheijen; Ronald Zweemer
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Nationwide analysis on surgical procedures for patients with endometrial cancer in Germany: results of the AGO pattern of care studies from the years 2013, 2009, and 2006.

Authors:  Marco Johannes Battista; Marcus Schmidt; Nicole Rieks; Joscha Steetskamp; Isabel Sicking; Antje Lebrecht; Heinz Koelbl; Peter Mallmann; Gerald Hoffmann; Eric Steiner
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Less is more: clinical impact of decreasing pneumoperitoneum pressures during robotic surgery.

Authors:  Christine E Foley; Erika Ryan; Jian Qun Huang
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-06-22

5.  Evaluation of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator in Gynecologic Oncology Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Surgery.

Authors:  Deanna Teoh; Rebi Nahum Halloway; Jennifer Heim; Rachel Isaksson Vogel; Colleen Rivard
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 4.137

6.  Effect of Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine on Postoperative Pain in the Gynecologic Oncology Patient.

Authors:  Colleen Rivard; Rachel Isaksson Vogel; Deanna Teoh
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 4.137

7.  Use and outcomes of minimally invasive hysterectomy for women with nonendometrioid endometrial cancers.

Authors:  Vanessa L Nieto; Yongmei Huang; June Y Hou; Ana I Tergas; Caryn M St Clair; Cande V Ananth; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 8.  Lymphadenectomy for the management of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan A Frost; Katie E Webster; Andrew Bryant; Jo Morrison
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-10-02

9.  Comparative Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; William M Burke; Ana I Tergas; June Y Hou; Yongmei Huang; Jim C Hu; Grace Clarke Hillyer; Cande V Ananth; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  The cost-effectiveness of total laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to total abdominal hysterectomy for the treatment of early stage endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Nicholas Graves; Monika Janda; Katharina Merollini; Val Gebski; Andreas Obermair
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.