Literature DB >> 22932780

Robotic surgery for gynaecologic cancer: an overview.

René Verheijen1, Ronald Zweemer.   

Abstract

After decades of reluctance to change surgical approaches, new technologies have created new perspectives for surgery. Initially, the laparoscopic approach was considered to be only one useful for relatively simple procedures as the design of the instruments and the limited access hampered free movements to perform complicated surgery. Robotic systems overcame this problem and boosted the use of minimally invasive techniques also for radical gynaecological surgery. Robot-assisted laparoscopy can now routinely be used for the surgical treatment of early or downstaged cervical carcinoma, endometrial carcinoma and staging of early ovarian carcinoma. Robot-assisted laparoscopy has proven to be feasible, although the benefits for the patient are less clear than those for the surgeon. The main advantage of robot-assisted laparoscopy over conventional laparoscopy is probably not that it is safer or better, but that it allows more types of radical surgery to be performed and that it prevents the surgeon from developing complaints and muscular conditions that interfere with the ability to perform surgery. New applications have emerged with the introduction of new devices to be used in conjunction with the robotic system as well as with totally new robotic systems. Training in these new tools should be more systematic and structured to allow their safe introduction and use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22932780     DOI: 10.1007/s11912-012-0270-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep        ISSN: 1523-3790            Impact factor:   5.075


  37 in total

Review 1.  Training and learning robotic surgery, time for a more structured approach: a systematic review.

Authors:  H W R Schreuder; R Wolswijk; R P Zweemer; M P Schijven; R H M Verheijen
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 6.531

2.  Cellular and humoral inflammatory response after laparoscopic and conventional colorectal resections.

Authors:  J Ordemann; C A Jacobi; W Schwenk; R Stösslein; J M Müller
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Vaginal cuff closure: a comparison between the vaginal route and laparoscopic suture in patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Authors:  Jong Ha Hwang; Jae Kwan Lee; Nak Woo Lee; Kyu Wan Lee
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  The difference of the impacts of surgical approaches on cellular immunity in patients with uterine malignancies: a comparative study of laparoscopy and laparotomy surgery.

Authors:  Nawei Zhang; Haiyan Liu; Zhenyu Zhang; Shuzhen Wang; Shuli Guo
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 5.  Robotic surgery for benign gynaecological disease.

Authors:  Hongqian Liu; DongHao Lu; Lei Wang; Gang Shi; Huan Song; Jane Clarke
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-02-15

6.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (Piver type III) with pelvic node dissection--case report.

Authors:  B M Sert; V M Abeler
Journal:  Eur J Gynaecol Oncol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 0.196

7.  Role of robot-assisted laparoscopy in adjuvant surgery for locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  E Lambaudie; F Narducci; M Bannier; C Jauffret; N Pouget; E Leblanc; G Houvenaeghel
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 4.424

8.  Robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized trial.

Authors:  S H Baik; Y T Ko; C M Kang; W J Lee; N K Kim; S K Sohn; H S Chi; C H Cho
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Robotic port-site and pelvic recurrences after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for a stage IB1 adenocarcinoma of the cervix with negative lymph nodes.

Authors:  Bilal Sert
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.547

10.  Robot assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy with short and long term morbidity data.

Authors:  Jan Persson; Petur Reynisson; Christer Borgfeldt; Paivi Kannisto; Bengt Lindahl; Thomas Bossmar
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-02-28       Impact factor: 5.482

View more
  3 in total

1.  Robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology.

Authors:  Theresa A Lawrie; Hongqian Liu; DongHao Lu; Therese Dowswell; Huan Song; Lei Wang; Gang Shi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-04-15

Review 2.  Robot-assisted surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Weimin Xie; Dongyan Cao; Jiaxin Yang; Keng Shen; Lin Zhao
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Definition of compartment-based radical surgery in uterine cancer: modified radical hysterectomy in intermediate/high-risk endometrial cancer using peritoneal mesometrial resection (PMMR) by M Höckel translated to robotic surgery.

Authors:  Rainer Kimmig; Bahriye Aktas; Paul Buderath; Pauline Wimberger; Antonella Iannaccone; Martin Heubner
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 2.754

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.