OBJECTIVES: Online weight control technologies could reduce barriers to treatment, including increased ease and convenience of self-monitoring. Self-monitoring consistently predicts outcomes in behavioral weight loss programs; however, little is known about patterns of self-monitoring associated with success. METHOD: The current study examines 161 participants (92% women; 31% African American; mean body mass index = 35.7 ± 5.7) randomized to a6-month online behavioral weight control program that offered weekly group "chat" sessions and online self-monitoring. Self-monitoring log-ins were continuously monitored electronically during treatment and examined in association with weight change and demographics. Weekend and weekday log-ins were examined separately and length of periods of continuous self-monitoring were examined. RESULTS: We found that 91% of participants logged in to the self-monitoring webpage at least once. Over 6 months, these participants monitored on an average of 28% of weekdays and 17% of weekend days, with most log-ins earlier in the program. Women were less likely to log-in, and there were trends for greater self-monitoring by older participants. Race, education, and marital status were not significant predictors of self-monitoring. Both weekday and weekend log-ins were significant independent predictors of weight loss. Patterns of consistent self-monitoring emerged early for participants who went on to achieve greater than a 5% weight loss. CONCLUSIONS: Patterns of online self-monitoring were strongly associated with weight loss outcomes. These results suggest a specific focus on consistent self-monitoring early in a behavioral weight control program might be beneficial for achieving clinically significant weight losses.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: Online weight control technologies could reduce barriers to treatment, including increased ease and convenience of self-monitoring. Self-monitoring consistently predicts outcomes in behavioral weight loss programs; however, little is known about patterns of self-monitoring associated with success. METHOD: The current study examines 161 participants (92% women; 31% African American; mean body mass index = 35.7 ± 5.7) randomized to a 6-month online behavioral weight control program that offered weekly group "chat" sessions and online self-monitoring. Self-monitoring log-ins were continuously monitored electronically during treatment and examined in association with weight change and demographics. Weekend and weekday log-ins were examined separately and length of periods of continuous self-monitoring were examined. RESULTS: We found that 91% of participants logged in to the self-monitoring webpage at least once. Over 6 months, these participants monitored on an average of 28% of weekdays and 17% of weekend days, with most log-ins earlier in the program. Women were less likely to log-in, and there were trends for greater self-monitoring by older participants. Race, education, and marital status were not significant predictors of self-monitoring. Both weekday and weekend log-ins were significant independent predictors of weight loss. Patterns of consistent self-monitoring emerged early for participants who went on to achieve greater than a 5% weight loss. CONCLUSIONS: Patterns of online self-monitoring were strongly associated with weight loss outcomes. These results suggest a specific focus on consistent self-monitoring early in a behavioral weight control program might be beneficial for achieving clinically significant weight losses.
Authors: Ellen C Cussler; Pedro J Teixeira; Scott B Going; Linda B Houtkooper; Lauve L Metcalfe; Robert M Blew; Jennifer R Ricketts; J'Fleur Lohman; Vanessa A Stanford; Timothy G Lohman Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2008-02-28 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Thomas A Wadden; Robert I Berkowitz; Leslie G Womble; David B Sarwer; Suzanne Phelan; Robert K Cato; Louise A Hesson; Suzette Y Osei; Rosalind Kaplan; Albert J Stunkard Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-11-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Lora E Burke; Molly B Conroy; Susan M Sereika; Okan U Elci; Mindi A Styn; Sushama D Acharya; Mary A Sevick; Linda J Ewing; Karen Glanz Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2010-09-16 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Jack F Hollis; Christina M Gullion; Victor J Stevens; Phillip J Brantley; Lawrence J Appel; Jamy D Ard; Catherine M Champagne; Arlene Dalcin; Thomas P Erlinger; Kristine Funk; Daniel Laferriere; Pao-Hwa Lin; Catherine M Loria; Carmen Samuel-Hodge; William M Vollmer; Laura P Svetkey Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Molly E Waring; Kristin L Schneider; Bradley M Appelhans; Tiffany A Moore Simas; Rui S Xiao; Matthew C Whited; Andrew M Busch; Martinus M Evans; Sherry L Pagoto Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Francisco I Salgado García; Karen J Derefinko; Zoran Bursac; Robert C Klesges; Jon O Ebbert; Catherine R Womack; Rebecca A Krukowski Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2018-11-13 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Loneke T Blackman Carr; Carmen Samuel-Hodge; Dianne Stanton Ward; Kelly R Evenson; Shrikant I Bangdiwala; Deborah F Tate Journal: Ethn Dis Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 1.847
Authors: Christine A Pellegrini; David E Conroy; Siobhan M Phillips; Angela Fidler Pfammatter; H Gene McFadden; Bonnie Spring Journal: J Nutr Educ Behav Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 3.045