Loneke T Blackman Carr1, Carmen Samuel-Hodge2, Dianne Stanton Ward2, Kelly R Evenson3, Shrikant I Bangdiwala4, Deborah F Tate2,5. 1. The Samuel Dubois Cook Center on Social Equity at Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. 2. Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 3. Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 4. Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario. 5. Department of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Abstract
Objective: We set out to determine if a primarily Internet-delivered behavioral weight loss intervention produced differential weight loss in African American and non-Hispanic White women, and to identify possible mediators. Design: Data for this analysis were from a randomized controlled trial, collected at baseline and 4-months. Setting: The intervention included monthly face-to-face group sessions and an Internet component that participants were recommended to use at least once weekly. Participants: We included overweight or obese African American and non-Hispanic White women (n=170), with at least weekly Internet access, who were able to attend group sessions. Intervention: Monthly face-to-face group sessions were delivered in large or small groups. The Internet component included automated tailored feedback, self-monitoring tools, written lessons, video resources, problem solving, exercise action planning tools, and social support through message boards. Main Outcome Measure: Multiple linear regression was used to evaluate race group differences in weight change. Results: Non-Hispanic White women lost more weight than African American women (-5.03% vs.-2.39%, P=.0002). Greater website log-ins and higher change in Eating Behavior Inventory score in non-Hispanic White women partially mediated the race-weight loss relationship. Conclusions: The weight loss disparity may be addressed through improved website engagement and adoption of weight control behaviors.
RCT Entities:
Objective: We set out to determine if a primarily Internet-delivered behavioral weight loss intervention produced differential weight loss in African American and non-Hispanic White women, and to identify possible mediators. Design: Data for this analysis were from a randomized controlled trial, collected at baseline and 4-months. Setting: The intervention included monthly face-to-face group sessions and an Internet component that participants were recommended to use at least once weekly. Participants: We included overweight or obese African American and non-Hispanic White women (n=170), with at least weekly Internet access, who were able to attend group sessions. Intervention: Monthly face-to-face group sessions were delivered in large or small groups. The Internet component included automated tailored feedback, self-monitoring tools, written lessons, video resources, problem solving, exercise action planning tools, and social support through message boards. Main Outcome Measure: Multiple linear regression was used to evaluate race group differences in weight change. Results: Non-Hispanic White women lost more weight than African American women (-5.03% vs.-2.39%, P=.0002). Greater website log-ins and higher change in Eating Behavior Inventory score in non-Hispanic White women partially mediated the race-weight loss relationship. Conclusions: The weight loss disparity may be addressed through improved website engagement and adoption of weight control behaviors.
Entities:
Keywords:
African American; Intervention; Obesity; Randomized Controlled Trial; Weight Loss
Authors: F B Scagliusi; E Ferriolli; K Pfrimer; C Laureano; C S F Cunha; B Gualano; B H Lourenço; A H Lancha Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2009-07-15 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Kristine L Funk; Victor J Stevens; Lawrence J Appel; Alan Bauck; Phillip J Brantley; Catherine M Champagne; Janelle Coughlin; Arlene T Dalcin; Jean Harvey-Berino; Jack F Hollis; Gerald J Jerome; Betty M Kennedy; Lillian F Lien; Valerie H Myers; Carmen Samuel-Hodge; Laura P Svetkey; William M Vollmer Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2010-07-27 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Peter T Katzmarzyk; Corby K Martin; Robert L Newton; John W Apolzan; Connie L Arnold; Terry C Davis; Eboni G Price-Haywood; Kara D Denstel; Emily F Mire; Tina K Thethi; Phillip J Brantley; William D Johnson; Vivian Fonseca; Jonathan Gugel; Kathleen B Kennedy; Carl J Lavie; Daniel F Sarpong; Benjamin Springgate Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2020-09-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Corrine I Voils; Jane Pendergast; Sarah L Hale; Jennifer M Gierisch; Elizabeth M Strawbridge; Erica Levine; Megan A McVay; Shelby D Reed; William S Yancy; Ryan J Shaw Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2021-04-26 Impact factor: 3.046