| Literature DB >> 22545051 |
Abstract
Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), the most common subtype of RCC, is characterized by high metastasis potential and strong resistance to traditional therapies, resulting in a poor five-year survival rate of patients. Several therapies targeted to VEGF pathway for advanced RCC have been developed, however, it still needs to discover new therapeutic targets for treating RCC. Genome-wide gene expression analyses have been broadly used to identify unknown molecular mechanisms of cancer progression. Recently, we applied the oligo-capping method to construct the full-length cDNA libraries of ccRCC and adjacent normal kidney, and analyzed the gene expression profiles by high-throughput sequencing. This paper presents a review for recent findings on therapeutic potential of MYC pathway and nicotinamide N-methyltransferase for the treatment of RCC.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22545051 PMCID: PMC3321460 DOI: 10.1155/2012/680796
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Oncol ISSN: 1687-8450 Impact factor: 4.375
Differential expression of ccRCC-associated genes in ccRCC.
| Unigene number | Gene symbol | Gene name | Location | Average fold change | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hs.481022 | SFRP2 | Secreted frizzled-related protein 2 | 4q31.3 | 34.9 | 50 |
| Hs.511883 | ZNF114 | Zinc finger protein 114 | 19q13.33 | 9.2 | 32 |
| Hs.164021 | CXCL6 | chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 6 (granulocyte chemotactic protein 2) | 4q21 | 5.0 | 39 |
| Hs.597524 | CDC42 | Cell division cycle 42 (GTP binding protein, 25 kDa) | 1p36.1 | 6.0 | 48 |
| Hs.436367 | LAMA3 | Laminin, alpha 3 | 18q11.2 | 5.7 | 43 |
| Hs.128453 | FRZB | Frizzled-related protein | 2qter | 6.2 | 61 |
| Hs.181301 | CTSS | Cathepsin S | 1q21 | 8.3 | 89 |
| Hs.416007 | SFRP4 | Secreted frizzled-related protein 4 | 7p14.1 | 4.3 | 50 |
| Hs.111779 | SPARC | Secreted protein, acidic, cysteine-rich (osteonectin) | 5q31.3–q32 | 4.3 | 75 |
| Hs.77269 | GNAI2 | Guanine nucleotide binding protein (G protein), alpha inhibiting activity polypeptide 2 | 3p21 | 3.4 | 50 |
| Hs.480653 | ANXA5 | Annexin A5 | 4q28–q32 | 3.1 | 36 |
| Hs.168718 | AFM | Afamin | 4q11–q13 | −1020.2 | 98 |
| Hs.102484 | GSTA3 | Glutathione S-transferase A3 | 6p12.1 | −72.8 | 70 |
| Hs.110675 | APOE | Apolipoprotein E | 19q13.2 | −6.4 | 61 |
| Hs.527971 | NES | Nestin | 1q23.1 | −6.3 | 48 |
| Hs.9029 | KRT23 | Keratin 23 (histone deacetylase inducible) | 17q21.2 | −5.5 | 50 |
| Hs.54415 | CSN3 | Casein kappa | 4q21.1 | −3.7 | 34 |
| Hs.632294 | ZNF38 | Zinc finger protein 38 | 7q22.1 | −2.3 | 41 |
| Hs.389996 | CHCHD2 | Coiled-coil-helix-coiled-coil-helix domain containing 2 | 7p11.2 | −2.0 | 36 |
| Hs.458358 | TSPYL1 | TSPY-like 1 | 6q22-q23 | −2.3 | 50 |
Top 5 functional networks of 383 differentially expressed genes in ccRCC.
| 1 |
| 55 | 35 | Protein synthesis, cellular assembly and organization, cancer |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
| 40 | 29 | Cancer, cell cycle, cellular compromise |
|
| ||||
| 3 |
| 37 | 28 | Cellular development, cellular growth and proliferation, connective tissue development and function |
|
| ||||
| 4 |
| 33 | 26 | Cancer, cellular movement, reproductive system disease |
|
| ||||
| 5 |
| 20 | 19 | Cancer, tumor morphology, cardiovascular system development and function |
The score represents the negative log of P value that indicates the likelihood of the focus genes in a network being found together due to chance. The number of focus genes reflects number of the differentially expressed genes of ccRCC in a network generated by IPA. (Bold): upregulated genes in ccRCC. (): downregulated genes in ccRCC. (Italic): group or complex. (Standard text): nonfocus genes not included in the 383 differentially expressed genes of ccRCC.
Figure 1MYC and 37 MYC-target genes in ccRCC. Nodes represent genes, and their shapes indicate their functional categories. The colors of the nodes show the fold changes of the differentially expressed genes between ccRCC and normal kidney tissues (red, upregulated genes; green, downregulated genes). Edge labels and shapes represent the biological relationships between two nodes.
Expression levels of MYC-target genes in ccRCC and adjacent normal tissues.
| Gene name | Normal kidney versus ccRCC† ( | Correlation coefficient with MYC expression level of ccRCC tissues ( |
|---|---|---|
| BCL2 | −6.58 ± 0.12 versus − 3.84 ± 0.17 (<0.001) | 0.45 (0.002)* |
| CCND1 | −4.45 ± 0.14 versus − 2.62 ± 0.18 (<0.001) | 0.31 (0.038)* |
| PCNA | −5.78 ± 0.14 versus − 4.76 ± 0.13 (<0.001) | 0.33 (0.038)* |
| PGK1 | −3.40 ± 0.18 versus − 2.70 ± 0.14 (<0.001) | 0.42 (0.004)* |
| VEGFA | −3.93 ± 0.30 versus − 1.23 ± 0.21 (<0.001) | 0.36 (0.016)* |
†Expression levels of MYC-target genes (−ΔCtGENE-TPT1 values) measured by Q-PCR in 44 tissues were represented as mean ± SE.
‡Significance of difference was determined by paired-samples Student's t test.
§Correlation between the expression levels of MYC and MYC-target genes in ccRCC tissues was determined by Pearson correlation method.
*P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Figure 4Effects of NNMT siRNA on MMP-2 expression in ccRCC cells. (a) Expression levels of MMP-2 and NNMT in ccRCC cell lines. Q-PCR was performed to determine MMP-2 and NNMT expression in ccRCC cell lines, 796P, 786O, Caki-2, and Caki-1. GAPDH was used as an internal control. (b) 786O and Caki-1 cells were transfected with 40 μmol/L of NNMT siRNA or control siRNA. Q-PCR (upper), gelatin zymography and western blot analyses (lower) were performed to determine the expression levels of NNMT and MMP-2. Q-PCR data are presented as the mean of triplicate replications. S.D. is indicated by error bars. **P < 0.001 versus control cells. Actin was used as a loading control.
Figure 2Overexpression of NNMT in ccRCC tissues. (a) mRNA expression levels of NNMT of 33 tissue pairs of ccRCC measured by Q-PCR analysis. Expression levels are represented by −ΔCtNNMT-TPT1 values. Each dot represents one tissue sample, and horizontal bars show mean values. P values are determined using a paired-samples Student's t test. (b) Western blot analysis to determine expression levels of NNMT protein in 10 ccRCC tissue pairs. N and T represent lysates from normal and tumor parts, respectively. Actin was used as a loading control.
Figure 3Effects of NNMT overexpression on the expression of MMP-2. (a) The expression levels of MMP-2 mRNA in HEK293/vector (control) and HEK293/NNMT cells were determined by Q-PCR and normalized to GAPDH. Data are presented as the mean of triplicate replications. S.D. is indicated by error bars. **P < 0.001 versus control cells. (b) Gelatin zymography assay was used to examine the MMP-2 activity in conditioned media, and western blot analysis to detect MMP-2 and NNMT in cell lysates from HEK293 cells with or without NNMT expression. (c) HEK293/vector and HEK293/NNMT cells were transfected with 40 μmol/L of NNMT siRNA or control siRNA. Q-PCR (upper) gelatin zymography and Western blot analyses (lower) were performed to determine the expression levels of NNMT and MMP-2. Q-PCR data are presented as the mean of triplicate replications. S.D. is indicated by error bars. **P < 0.001 versus control cells. Actin was used as loading control.
Figure 5Correlation between the expression levels of NNMT and MMP-2 in ccRCC tissues. (a) Expression levels of NNMT and MMP-2 in 33 ccRCC tissues were dotted by using the −ΔCt values, and the correlation between the expression of NNMT and MMP-2 was analyzed by the Pearson correlation method (r = 0.47, P < 0.01). (b) Immunohistochemistry analysis was used to detect NNMT and MMP-2 in ccRCC tissue sections. The representative cases with a positive (case 1) or negative (case 2) immunostaining of NNMT and MMP-2 are shown. Arrow indicates the cytoplasm immunostaining of NNMT and MMP-2. Photos were taken under 100x magnification.
Figure 6Signaling pathway involved in NNMT-mediated MMP-2 expression. (a) Various signaling pathway inhibitors were used to treat HEK293/NNMT cells transfected with full-length MMP-2 promoter plasmid and control reporter plasmid. The MMP-2 promoter activity was measured by luciferase reporter assay. Data are presented as the mean of triplicate replications. S.D. is indicated by error bars. **P < 0.001 versus untreated HEK293/NNMT cells. (b) HEK293/NNMT, 786O and Caki-1 cells were treated with LY294002 or AKT inhibitor IV for 18 h, and the expression of MMP-2 was measured by Q-PCR. Data are presented as the mean of triplicate replications. S.D. is indicated by error bars. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.001 versus untreated cells.
Figure 7Role of SP1-binding elements in MMP-2 transcriptional activity. (a) The diagrams of the reporter constructs of full-length or various deletion mutants of MMP-2 promoter (D1–D7) are depicted on the left. The solid lines are the regions cloned upstream of the luciferase gene in the pGL3 luciferase reporter vector. The luciferase activity of cell extracts was analyzed by luciferase reporter assay. Data are presented as the mean of triplicate replications. S.D. is indicated by error bars. **P < 0.001 versus HEK293/NNMT cells transfected with full-length MMP-2 promoter. (b) Effects of site-specific mutation of the two putative SP1-binding sites on MMP-2 promoter activity were examined by luciferase reporter assay. Data are presented as the mean of triplicate replications. S.D. is indicated by error bars. **P < 0.001 versus HEK293/NNMT cells transfected with wild-type D3 construct.
Figure 8Importance of SP1 in MMP-2 expression induced by NNMT. (a) Effects of SP1 siRNA on the expression of MMP-2 and SP1. Cells were transfected with 40 μmol/L of SP1 siRNA or control siRNA, and Q-PCR was performed to determine the expression levels of NNMT and MMP-2. Data are presented as the mean of triplicate replications. S.D. is indicated by error bars. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.001 versus control cells. (b) Effects of SP1 inhibitor, mithramycin, on the expression of MMP-2. Cells were treated with 12.5 or 25 nmol/L of mithramycin for 18 h, and the expression levels of MMP-2 were examined by Q-PCR. Data are presented as the mean of triplicate replications. S.D. is indicated by error bars. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.001 versus control cells.
Figure 9Role of PI3K/AKT pathway in the binding of SP1 to MMP-2 promoter. HEK293/NNMT cells were treated with or without 5 μmol/L of LY294002 or 1 μmol/L of AKT inhibitor IV for 18 h, and the association of SP1 on the SP1 binding elements of the MMP-2 promoter was determined by CHIP assay. Rabbit IgG was used as the negative control and 4% input as positive control.
Figure 10Enhancement of cell invasiveness by NNMT via MMP-2. (a) Matrigel invasion assay was used to analyze the invasive activity. HEK293/vector and HEK293/NNMT cells were seeded into the matrigel-coated chamber and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. (b) Effects of MMP-2-neutralizing antibody or MMP-2 inhibitor OA-Hy on the invasive activity of HEK293/NNMT cells were examined. Data are presented as the mean of triplicate replications. S.D. is indicated by error bars. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.001 versus untreated HEK293/NNMT cells. (c) 786O and Caki-1 cells were transfected with 40 μmol/L of NNMT siRNA for 24 h and then incubated with or without 20 ng of MMP-2 protein in matrigel-coated chamber for another 24 h. Data presented are the mean of triplicate replications. S.D. is indicated by error bars. **P < 0.001 versus control cells.
Figure 11Effects of NNMT shRNA on the growth and lung metastasis of ccRCC cells in NOD-SCID mice. Western blot analysis (a) and matrigel invasion assay (b) were performed to examine NNMT and MMP-2 expression and invasive activities of 786O/NNMT shRNA and 786O/control shRNA cells. Actin was used as loading control. (c) 4 × 106 of 786O/NNMT shRNA or 786O/luciferase shRNA cells were s.c. injected into the hind limb of NOD-SCID mice (n = 6). Tumor volume was measured every three days. Data are presented as the mean of triplicate replications. S.D. is indicated by error bars. **P < 0.001 versus control cells. (d) 1 × 106 of cells in 200 μL of serum-free DMEM medium were intravenously injected into the lateral tail vein of NOD-SCID mice (n = 6). After 6 weeks of injection, the mice were sacrificed, and the metastatic nodules of lungs were counted. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. *P < 0.05 versus control cells.