BACKGROUND: The objective of the present study was to investigate the significance of microscopic venous invasion (MVI) as a prognostic factor for patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who underwent radical surgery. METHODS: The study included a total of 157 consecutive patients with non-metastatic RCC who underwent radical surgery between January 1986 and December 2002. The median follow-up period was 45 months (range 6-162 months). Microscopic venous invasion was defined by the presence of a cancer cell in blood vessels based on the examination of hematoxylin-eosin stained specimens. Other prognostic variables were assessed by multivariate analysis to determine whether there was a significant impact on cancer-specific and recurrence-free survivals. RESULTS: Microscopic venous invasion was found in 70 patients, and of this number, 17 (24.7%) developed a tumor recurrence and 12 (17.1%) died of cancer progression, while only six (6.9%) of the remaining 87 patients without MVI presented with disease-recurrence and three (3.5%) died of cancer. Among the factors examined, the presence of MVI was significantly associated with age, mode of detection, tumor size, pathological stage and tumor grade; however, only pathological stage was an independent predictor for disease-recurrence, and none of these factors were available to predict cancer-specific survival in multivariate analyses. In 120 patients with pT1 or pT2 disease, MVI was noted in 36 patients. In this subgroup, recurrence-free survival rates in patients with MVI were significantly lower than those in patients without MVI, and MVI was the only independent prognostic predictor for disease-recurrence in a multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Microscopic venous invasion is not an independent prognostic factor in patients with non-metastatic RCC who underwent radical surgery; however, it could be the only independent predictor of disease-recurrence after radical surgery for patients with pT1 or pT2 disease.
BACKGROUND: The objective of the present study was to investigate the significance of microscopic venous invasion (MVI) as a prognostic factor for patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who underwent radical surgery. METHODS: The study included a total of 157 consecutive patients with non-metastatic RCC who underwent radical surgery between January 1986 and December 2002. The median follow-up period was 45 months (range 6-162 months). Microscopic venous invasion was defined by the presence of a cancer cell in blood vessels based on the examination of hematoxylin-eosin stained specimens. Other prognostic variables were assessed by multivariate analysis to determine whether there was a significant impact on cancer-specific and recurrence-free survivals. RESULTS: Microscopic venous invasion was found in 70 patients, and of this number, 17 (24.7%) developed a tumor recurrence and 12 (17.1%) died of cancer progression, while only six (6.9%) of the remaining 87 patients without MVI presented with disease-recurrence and three (3.5%) died of cancer. Among the factors examined, the presence of MVI was significantly associated with age, mode of detection, tumor size, pathological stage and tumor grade; however, only pathological stage was an independent predictor for disease-recurrence, and none of these factors were available to predict cancer-specific survival in multivariate analyses. In 120 patients with pT1 or pT2 disease, MVI was noted in 36 patients. In this subgroup, recurrence-free survival rates in patients with MVI were significantly lower than those in patients without MVI, and MVI was the only independent prognostic predictor for disease-recurrence in a multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Microscopic venous invasion is not an independent prognostic factor in patients with non-metastatic RCC who underwent radical surgery; however, it could be the only independent predictor of disease-recurrence after radical surgery for patients with pT1 or pT2 disease.
Authors: Daniel Baumhoer; Thore Thiesler; Christoph A Maurer; Andreas Huber; Gieri Cathomas Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2010-02-09 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Hai Huang; Xiu-Wu Pan; Yi Huang; Dan-Feng Xu; Xin-Gang Cui; Lin Li; Yi Hong; Lu Chen; Yi Gao; Lei Yin Journal: Int J Clin Exp Med Date: 2015-07-15
Authors: Manuel S Eisenberg; John C Cheville; R Houston Thompson; Dharam Kaushik; Christine M Lohse; Stephen A Boorjian; Brian A Costello; Bradley C Leibovich Journal: J Urol Date: 2013-01-23 Impact factor: 7.450