Literature DB >> 22543742

Maximal physiological parameters during partial body-weight support treadmill testing.

Boris Gojanovic1, Phil Cutti, Rebecca Shultz, Gordon O Matheson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study investigated maximal cardiometabolic response while running in a lower body positive pressure treadmill (antigravity treadmill (AG)), which reduces body weight (BW) and impact. The AG is used in rehabilitation of injuries but could have potential for high-speed running, if workload is maximally elevated.
METHODS: Fourteen trained (nine male) runners (age 27 ± 5 yr; 10-km personal best, 38.1 ± 1.1 min) completed a treadmill incremental test (CON) to measure aerobic capacity and heart rate (VO(2max) and HR(max)). They completed four identical tests (48 h apart, randomized order) on the AG at BW of 100%, 95%, 90%, and 85% (AG100 to AG85). Stride length and rate were measured at peak velocities (V(peak)).
RESULTS: VO(2max) (mL.kg(-1).min(-1)) was similar across all conditions (men: CON = 66.6 (3.0), AG100 = 65.6 (3.8), AG95 = 65.0 (5.4), AG90 = 65.6 (4.5), and AG85 = 65.0 (4.8); women: CON = 63.0 (4.6), AG100 = 61.4 (4.3), AG95 = 60.7 (4.8), AG90 = 61.4 (3.3), and AG85 = 62.8 (3.9)). Similar results were found for HR(max), except for AG85 in men and AG100 and AG90 in women, which were lower than CON. V(peak) (km.h(-1)) in men was 19.7 (0.9) in CON, which was lower than every other condition: AG100 = 21.0 (1.9) (P < 0.05), AG95 = 21.4 (1.8) (P < 0.01), AG90 = 22.3 (2.1) (P < 0.01), and AG85 = 22.6 (1.6) (P < 0.001). In women, V(peak) (km.h(-1)) was similar between CON (17.8 (1.1) ) and AG100 (19.3 (1.0)) but higher at AG95 = 19.5 (0.4) (P < 0.05), AG90 = 19.5 (0.8) (P < 0.05), and AG85 = 21.2 (0.9) (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The AG can be used at maximal exercise intensities at BW of 85% to 95%, reaching faster running speeds than normally feasible. The AG could be used for overspeed running programs at the highest metabolic response levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22543742     DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31825a5d1f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  13 in total

Review 1.  Physiological and Biomechanical Responses to Running on Lower Body Positive Pressure Treadmills in Healthy Populations.

Authors:  Kathryn A Farina; Alexis A Wright; Kevin R Ford; Leah Anne Wirfel; James M Smoliga
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Potential utility of anti-gravity treadmills in the realm of cardiovascular stress testing.

Authors:  Vasvi Singh; Saurabh Malhotra
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Oxygen consumption of elite distance runners on an anti-gravity treadmill®.

Authors:  David K P McNeill; John R Kline; Hendrick D de Heer; J Richard Coast
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  Cardiovascular responses in older adults with total knee arthroplasty at rest and with exercise on a positive pressure treadmill.

Authors:  Sandra C Webber; Karla J Horvey; Madison T Yurach Pikaluk; Scott J Butcher
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  AlterG Anti-Gravity Treadmill Accuracy of Unloading Is Affected by Support Frame Height.

Authors:  Hendrik D de Heer; Alex Kaufman; Chris P Repka; Katia Rojas; Brenda Charley; Roger Bounds
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.415

6.  Physiological Responses During the Lower Body Positive Pressure Supported Treadmill Test.

Authors:  Ka-Young Lee; Jae-Young Han; Ji-Hyun Kim; Dong-Ju Kim; In-Sung Choi
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2016-10-31

7.  The Effect of Lower-Body Positive Pressure on the Cardiorespiratory Response at Rest and during Submaximal Running Exercise.

Authors:  Frédéric Stucky; Jean-Marc Vesin; Bengt Kayser; Barbara Uva
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Anti-gravity treadmill can promote aerobic exercise for lower limb osteoarthritis patients.

Authors:  Toshihiro Kawae; Yukio Mikami; Kouki Fukuhara; Hiroaki Kimura; Nobuo Adachi
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-08-10

9.  Lower body positive pressure: an emerging technology in the battle against knee osteoarthritis?

Authors:  Judit Takacs; Judy E Anderson; Jeff R S Leiter; Peter B MacDonald; Jason D Peeler
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 4.458

10.  Physiological and Biomechanical Responses of Highly Trained Distance Runners to Lower-Body Positive Pressure Treadmill Running.

Authors:  Kyle R Barnes; Jessica N Janecke
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2017-11-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.