PURPOSE: Although studies have shown health benefits for moderate-intensity physical activity, there is limited evidence to support beneficial effects for high amounts of vigorous activity among middle-age and older men. The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between vigorous-intensity physical activity, compared with moderate-intensity activity, and risk of major chronic disease in men. METHODS: We prospectively examined the associations between vigorous- and moderate-intensity physical activity and risk of major chronic disease among 44,551 men age 40-75 yr in 1986. Leisure-time physical activity was assessed biennially by questionnaire. During 22 yr of follow-up, we documented 14,162 incident cases of major chronic disease, including 4769 cardiovascular events, 6449 cancer events, and 2944 deaths from other causes. RESULTS: The HR of major chronic disease comparing ≥ 21 to 0 MET.h.wk(-1) of exercise was 0.86 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.81-0.91) for vigorous-intensity activity and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.80-0.90) for moderate activity. For cardiovascular disease (CVD), the corresponding HRs were 0.78 (95% CI, 0.70-0.86) and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.72-0.88), respectively. When examined separately, running, tennis, and brisk walking were inversely associated with CVD risk. Furthermore, more vigorous activity was associated with lower disease risk; the HR comparing >70 to 0 MET.h.wk(-1) of vigorous-intensity exercise was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.68-0.92; P < 0.0001 for trend) for major chronic disease and 0.73 (95% CI, 0.56-0.96; P < 0.0001 for trend) for CVD. CONCLUSIONS: Vigorous- and moderate-intensity physical activities were associated with lower risk of major chronic disease and CVD. Increasing amounts of vigorous activity remained inversely associated with disease risk, even among men in the highest categories of exercise.
PURPOSE: Although studies have shown health benefits for moderate-intensity physical activity, there is limited evidence to support beneficial effects for high amounts of vigorous activity among middle-age and older men. The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between vigorous-intensity physical activity, compared with moderate-intensity activity, and risk of major chronic disease in men. METHODS: We prospectively examined the associations between vigorous- and moderate-intensity physical activity and risk of major chronic disease among 44,551 men age 40-75 yr in 1986. Leisure-time physical activity was assessed biennially by questionnaire. During 22 yr of follow-up, we documented 14,162 incident cases of major chronic disease, including 4769 cardiovascular events, 6449 cancer events, and 2944 deaths from other causes. RESULTS: The HR of major chronic disease comparing ≥ 21 to 0 MET.h.wk(-1) of exercise was 0.86 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.81-0.91) for vigorous-intensity activity and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.80-0.90) for moderate activity. For cardiovascular disease (CVD), the corresponding HRs were 0.78 (95% CI, 0.70-0.86) and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.72-0.88), respectively. When examined separately, running, tennis, and brisk walking were inversely associated with CVD risk. Furthermore, more vigorous activity was associated with lower disease risk; the HR comparing >70 to 0 MET.h.wk(-1) of vigorous-intensity exercise was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.68-0.92; P < 0.0001 for trend) for major chronic disease and 0.73 (95% CI, 0.56-0.96; P < 0.0001 for trend) for CVD. CONCLUSIONS: Vigorous- and moderate-intensity physical activities were associated with lower risk of major chronic disease and CVD. Increasing amounts of vigorous activity remained inversely associated with disease risk, even among men in the highest categories of exercise.
Authors: Jacob Sattelmair; Jeremy Pertman; Eric L Ding; Harold W Kohl; William Haskell; I-Min Lee Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-08-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: M Wilson; R O'Hanlon; S Prasad; A Deighan; P Macmillan; D Oxborough; R Godfrey; G Smith; A Maceira; S Sharma; K George; G Whyte Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2011-02-17
Authors: Xuemei Sui; Duck-Chul Lee; Charles E Matthews; Swann A Adams; James R Hébert; Timothy S Church; Chong-Do Lee; Steven N Blair Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Stefan Möhlenkamp; Nils Lehmann; Frank Breuckmann; Martina Bröcker-Preuss; Kai Nassenstein; Martin Halle; Thomas Budde; Klaus Mann; Jörg Barkhausen; Gerd Heusch; Karl-Heinz Jöckel; Raimund Erbel Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2008-04-21 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Regan A Howard; D Michal Freedman; Yikyung Park; Albert Hollenbeck; Arthur Schatzkin; Michael F Leitzmann Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2008-04-25 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Michael F Leitzmann; Corinna Koebnick; Christian C Abnet; Neal D Freedman; Yikyung Park; Albert Hollenbeck; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Arthur Schatzkin Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2009-01-06 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Fabian Sanchis-Gomar; Laura M Pérez; Michael J Joyner; Herbert Löllgen; Alejandro Lucia Journal: Sports Med Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Anna K Porter; Samantha Schilsky; Kelly R Evenson; Roberta Florido; Priya Palta; Katelyn M Holliday; Aaron R Folsom Journal: J Phys Act Health Date: 2019-08-01
Authors: Yuehan Wang; Duck-Chul Lee; Angelique G Brellenthin; Thijs M H Eijsvogels; Xuemei Sui; Timothy S Church; Carl J Lavie; Steven N Blair Journal: Am J Med Date: 2019-05-17 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Eric J Shiroma; Nancy R Cook; Joann E Manson; M V Moorthy; Julie E Buring; Eric B Rimm; I-Min Lee Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Andrea K Chomistek; Beate Henschel; A Heather Eliassen; Kenneth J Mukamal; Eric B Rimm Journal: Circulation Date: 2016-07-26 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Duck-Chul Lee; Russell R Pate; Carl J Lavie; Xuemei Sui; Timothy S Church; Steven N Blair Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2014-08-05 Impact factor: 24.094