Literature DB >> 22543227

Socioeconomic status over the life-course and adult bone mineral density: the Midlife in the U.S. Study.

Carolyn J Crandall1, Sharon Stein Merkin, Teresa E Seeman, Gail A Greendale, Neil Binkley, Arun S Karlamangla.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Adult bone mass depends on acquisition in childhood and decline in adulthood, and may be influenced by socioeconomic conditions over the entire life course.
METHODS: We examined associations of bone mineral density (BMD) in adulthood with life course socioeconomic status in 729 participants in the Midlife in the United States Biomarker Project, adjusting for age, menopausal transition stage, race, gender, body weight, smoking, physical activity in several life stages, and research site. Primary predictors were a) childhood socioeconomic advantage score (including parental education, self-rated financial status relative to others, not being on welfare), b) adult education level (no college vs. some college vs. college graduate), and c) adult current financial advantage score (including family-adjusted poverty to income ratio, self-assessed current financial situation, having enough money to meet needs, ease in paying bills).
RESULTS: Mean age was 56.9 (range 34-85) years. After adjustment for covariates, childhood socioeconomic advantage and adult education level were positively associated with lumbar spine BMD: 0.27 standard deviations (SD) higher at 90th compared to 10th percentile of childhood advantage score (P=0.009), and 0.24 SD higher in college graduates compared to participants without college education (P=0.01). Adult current financial advantage was not associated with lumbar spine BMD. None of the three socioeconomic indicators was significantly associated with femoral neck BMD.
CONCLUSIONS: Childhood socioeconomic advantage and adult education level were associated with higher adult lumbar spine BMD. Current financial advantage was not associated with BMD. Childhood socioeconomic factors may influence acquisition of lumbar BMD.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22543227      PMCID: PMC3371160          DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  46 in total

1.  Previous sport activity during childhood and adolescence is associated with increased cortical bone size in young adult men.

Authors:  Martin Nilsson; Claes Ohlsson; Dan Mellström; Mattias Lorentzon
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 2.  Regulation of bone remodeling by the central and peripheral nervous system.

Authors:  Florent Elefteriou
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2008-03-23       Impact factor: 4.013

Review 3.  Proinflammatory cytokines and osteoporosis.

Authors:  Robert R McLean
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  Low early-life social class leaves a biological residue manifested by decreased glucocorticoid and increased proinflammatory signaling.

Authors:  Gregory E Miller; Edith Chen; Alexandra K Fok; Hope Walker; Alvin Lim; Erin F Nicholls; Steve Cole; Michael S Kobor
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Socio-economic differentials in peripheral biology: cumulative allostatic load.

Authors:  Teresa Seeman; Elissa Epel; Tara Gruenewald; Arun Karlamangla; Bruce S McEwen
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 6.  Bone disease in diabetes.

Authors:  M Luisa Isidro; Belén Ruano
Journal:  Curr Diabetes Rev       Date:  2010-05

Review 7.  Mechanisms of impaired bone strength in type 1 and 2 diabetes.

Authors:  D Merlotti; L Gennari; F Dotta; D Lauro; R Nuti
Journal:  Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.222

8.  Peripheral bone mineral density and its predictors in healthy school girls from two different socioeconomic groups in Delhi.

Authors:  R K Marwaha; N Tandon; D H K Reddy; K Mani; S Puri; N Aggarwal; K Grewal; S Singh
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-12-12       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Poverty is a risk factor for osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  M C Navarro; M Sosa; P Saavedra; P Lainez; M Marrero; M Torres; C D Medina
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Who participates? Accounting for longitudinal retention in the MIDUS national study of health and well-being.

Authors:  Barry T Radler; Carol D Ryff
Journal:  J Aging Health       Date:  2010-01-26
View more
  18 in total

1.  Oral health behaviors and bone mineral density in South Korea: the 2008-2010 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  Hyun-Jin Kim; Yang-Hyun Kim; Kyung-Hwan Cho; Byoung-Duck Han; Seon-Mee Kim; Youn-Seon Choi; Do-Hoon Kim; Kyung-Do Han; Yong-Joo Lee; Chul-Min Kim
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Socioeconomic status in relation to incident fracture risk in the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation.

Authors:  C J Crandall; W Han; G A Greendale; T Seeman; P Tepper; R Thurston; C Karvonen-Gutierrez; A S Karlamangla
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Early life adversity and adult biological risk profiles.

Authors:  Esther M Friedman; Arun S Karlamangla; Tara L Gruenewald; Brandon Koretz; Teresa E Seeman
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2015 Feb-Mar       Impact factor: 4.312

4.  Socioeconomic status and bone mineral density in adults by race/ethnicity and gender: the Louisiana osteoporosis study.

Authors:  Y Du; L-J Zhao; Q Xu; K-H Wu; H-W Deng
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Adult bone strength of children from single-parent families: the Midlife in the United States Study.

Authors:  C J Crandall; A S Karlamangla; S S Merkin; N Binkley; D Carr; G A Greendale; T E Seeman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Multisystem dysregulation and bone strength: findings from the study of midlife in the United States.

Authors:  Takahiro Mori; Arun S Karlamangla; Sharon Stein Merkin; Carolyn J Crandall; Neil Binkley; Gail A Greendale; Teresa E Seeman
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  FRAX provides robust fracture prediction regardless of socioeconomic status.

Authors:  S L Brennan; W D Leslie; L M Lix; H Johansson; A Oden; E McCloskey; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Marital histories, marital support, and bone density: findings from the Midlife in the United States Study.

Authors:  D Miller-Martinez; T Seeman; A S Karlamangla; G A Greendale; N Binkley; C J Crandall
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Insulin resistance and bone strength: findings from the study of midlife in the United States.

Authors:  Preethi Srikanthan; Carolyn J Crandall; Dana Miller-Martinez; Teresa E Seeman; Gail A Greendale; Neil Binkley; Arun S Karlamangla
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Childhood socioeconomic status and adult femoral neck bone strength: findings from the Midlife in the United States Study.

Authors:  Arun S Karlamangla; Takahiro Mori; Sharon S Merkin; Teresa E Seeman; Gail A Greendale; Neil Binkley; Carolyn J Crandall
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 4.398

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.