Literature DB >> 17160694

Peripheral bone mineral density and its predictors in healthy school girls from two different socioeconomic groups in Delhi.

R K Marwaha1, N Tandon, D H K Reddy, K Mani, S Puri, N Aggarwal, K Grewal, S Singh.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Peripheral bone density measurements are scarce and the factors, which predict bone mineral density at these sites, especially in children, are not clearly known. In this study, age, height, weight and alkaline phosphatase had a significant association on peripheral bone mineral density in healthy Indian school girls.
INTRODUCTION: Factors that lead to the attainment of peak bone mass at peripheral sites, during period of growth are not clearly known.
METHODS: Six-hundred and sixty-four randomly selected 7- to 17-year-old girls from upper and lower socioeconomic status (USES/LSES) schools were assessed clinically and a recording of their height and weight was undertaken. Serum calcium, phosphorus, total alkaline phosphatase (ALP), 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD) and parathyroid hormone (PTH) were measured in all of them. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at the distal forearm (BMDdf) and calcaneum (BMDca) by peripheral dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (pDXA).
RESULTS: Girls belonging to the USES were significantly taller (149.7 +/- 12.3 cm vs 144.4 +/- 11.9 cm; P < 0.001) and weighed more (44.3 +/- 12.9 kg vs 35.9 +/- 10.0 kg; P < 0.001) than girls from the LSES. USES girls had a significantly higher mean serum calcium (9.3 +/- 0.7 mg/dl vs 9.2 +/- 0.8 mg/dl; P < 0.05) and significantly lower alkaline phosphatase (316 +/- 166 IU/l vs 423 +/- 228 IU/l; P < 0.01) and iPTH (29.9 +/- 18.4 pg/ml vs 45.7 +/- 64.6 pg/ml; P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in mean serum phosphorus and 25-OHD levels between the two groups. USES subjects had higher BMD at both sites than LSES subjects. BMDdf and BMDca increased with age and tended to plateau by 16 years and 12 years of age respectively in both the groups. Age, height and weight explained approximately 50% of the variability, while biochemical parameters explained approximately 30% of variability in BMD at both the sites. The only biochemical parameter which had a significant association with BMD was ALP at the distal forearm.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, age, nutrition, height and weight are significantly associated with BMD at peripheral sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17160694     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-006-0247-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  38 in total

1.  Reference data of forearm bone mineral density in healthy Japanese male and female subjects in the second decade based on calendar age and puberty onset: Japanese Population Based Osteoporosis (JPOS) study.

Authors:  T Matsukura; S Kagamimori; T Yamagami; H Nishino; M Iki; E Kajita; Y Kagawa; H Yoneshima; T Matsuzaki; F Marumo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Biochemical markers of bone turnover and the volume and the density of bone in children at different stages of sexual development.

Authors:  S Mora; P Pitukcheewanont; F R Kaufman; J C Nelson; V Gilsanz
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Rapid bone loss is associated with increased levels of biochemical markers.

Authors:  P D Ross; W Knowlton
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Sex differences in the effect of body-composition variables on bone mass in healthy children and adolescents.

Authors:  Asma Arabi; Hala Tamim; Mona Nabulsi; Joyce Maalouf; Hassan Khalifé; Mahmoud Choucair; Reinhold Vieth; Ghada El-Hajj Fuleihan
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Parathyroid hormone is elevated but bone markers and density are normal in young female subjects who consume inadequate dietary calcium.

Authors:  D Bonofiglio; M Maggiolini; S Catalano; S Marsico; S Aquila; A Giorno; S Andò
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.718

6.  Bone mineral density in the cortical and trabecular distal forearm in healthy children and adolescents.

Authors:  M Gunnes
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.299

7.  Dietary calcium, saturated fat, fiber and vitamin C as predictors of forearm cortical and trabecular bone mineral density in healthy children and adolescents.

Authors:  M Gunnes; E H Lehmann
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.299

8.  Bone mass in children: normative values for the 2-20-year-old population.

Authors:  J R Zanchetta; H Plotkin; M L Alvarez Filgueira
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Bone mineral density by age, gender, pubertal stages, and socioeconomic status in healthy Lebanese children and adolescents.

Authors:  Asma Arabi; Mona Nabulsi; Joyce Maalouf; Mahmoud Choucair; Hassan Khalifé; Reinhold Vieth; Ghada El-Hajj Fuleihan
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 10.  Official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

Authors:  Edward S Leib; E Michael Lewiecki; Neil Binkley; Ronald C Hamdy
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  8 in total

1.  Bone health in healthy Indian population aged 50 years and above.

Authors:  R K Marwaha; N Tandon; M K Garg; R Kanwar; A Narang; A Sastry; A Saberwal; K Bhadra; A Mithal
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Socioeconomic status and bone health in community-dwelling older men: the CHAMP Study.

Authors:  I Nabipour; R Cumming; D J Handelsman; M Litchfield; V Naganathan; L Waite; H Creasey; M Janu; D Le Couteur; P N Sambrook; M J Seibel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Socioeconomic status over the life-course and adult bone mineral density: the Midlife in the U.S. Study.

Authors:  Carolyn J Crandall; Sharon Stein Merkin; Teresa E Seeman; Gail A Greendale; Neil Binkley; Arun S Karlamangla
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Socioeconomic status and bone mineral density in adults by race/ethnicity and gender: the Louisiana osteoporosis study.

Authors:  Y Du; L-J Zhao; Q Xu; K-H Wu; H-W Deng
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Impact of maternal veiling during pregnancy and socioeconomic status on offspring's musculoskeletal health.

Authors:  M Nabulsi; Z Mahfoud; J Maalouf; A Arabi; G E-H Fuleihan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Vitamin D deficiency in India: prevalence, causalities and interventions.

Authors:  Ritu G; Ajay Gupta
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 5.717

7.  Vitamin D deficiency and its predictors in a country with thirteen months of sunshine: the case of school children in central Ethiopia.

Authors:  Tolassa Wakayo; Tefera Belachew; Hassan Vatanparast; Susan J Whiting
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effect of Vitamin D Levels on Bone Remodeling in Healthy Women.

Authors:  Sandhya Nair; Hetal Bhadricha; Sonam Hatkar; Seema S Kadam; Anushree Patil; Suchitra Surve; Beena Joshi; M Ikram Khatkhatay; Meena Desai
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-05-02
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.