BACKGROUND: In 2008, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) ceased additional payment for hospitalizations resulting in complications deemed preventable, including several health care-associated infections. We sought to understand the impact of the CMS payment policy on infection prevention efforts. METHODS: A national survey of infection preventionists from a random sample of US hospitals was conducted in December 2010. RESULTS: Eighty-one percent reported increased attention to HAIs targeted by the CMS policy, whereas one-third reported spending less time on nontargeted HAIs. Only 15% reported increased funding for infection control as a result of the CMS policy, whereas most reported stable (77%) funding. Respondents reported faster removal of urinary (71%) and central venous (50%) catheters as a result of the CMS policy, whereas routine urine and blood cultures on admission occurred infrequently (27% and 13%, respectively). Resource shifting (ie, less time spent on nontargeted HAIs) occurred more commonly in large hospitals (odds ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval: 1.0-5.1; P = .038) but less often in hospitals where front-line staff were receptive to changes in clinical processes (odds ratio, 0.5; 95% confidence interval: 0.3-0.8; P = .005). CONCLUSION: Infection preventionists reported greater hospital attention to preventing targeted HAIs as a result of the CMS nonpayment policy. Whether the increased focus and greater engagement in HAI prevention practices has led to better patient outcomes is unclear.
BACKGROUND: In 2008, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) ceased additional payment for hospitalizations resulting in complications deemed preventable, including several health care-associated infections. We sought to understand the impact of the CMS payment policy on infection prevention efforts. METHODS: A national survey of infection preventionists from a random sample of US hospitals was conducted in December 2010. RESULTS: Eighty-one percent reported increased attention to HAIs targeted by the CMS policy, whereas one-third reported spending less time on nontargeted HAIs. Only 15% reported increased funding for infection control as a result of the CMS policy, whereas most reported stable (77%) funding. Respondents reported faster removal of urinary (71%) and central venous (50%) catheters as a result of the CMS policy, whereas routine urine and blood cultures on admission occurred infrequently (27% and 13%, respectively). Resource shifting (ie, less time spent on nontargeted HAIs) occurred more commonly in large hospitals (odds ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval: 1.0-5.1; P = .038) but less often in hospitals where front-line staff were receptive to changes in clinical processes (odds ratio, 0.5; 95% confidence interval: 0.3-0.8; P = .005). CONCLUSION:Infection preventionists reported greater hospital attention to preventing targeted HAIs as a result of the CMS nonpayment policy. Whether the increased focus and greater engagement in HAI prevention practices has led to better patient outcomes is unclear.
Authors: Heather C Kaplan; Patrick W Brady; Michele C Dritz; David K Hooper; W Matthew Linam; Craig M Froehle; Peter Margolis Journal: Milbank Q Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 4.911
Authors: Patricia W Stone; Sherry A Glied; Peter D McNair; Nikolas Matthes; Bevin Cohen; Timothy F Landers; Elaine L Larson Journal: Med Care Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Robert McNutt; Tricia J Johnson; Richard Odwazny; Zachary Remmich; Kimberly Skarupski; Steven Meurer; Samuel Hohmann; Brian Harting Journal: Qual Manag Health Care Date: 2010 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 0.926
Authors: Evelyn Lo; Lindsay Nicolle; David Classen; Kathleen M Arias; Kelly Podgorny; Deverick J Anderson; Helen Burstin; David P Calfee; Susan E Coffin; Erik R Dubberke; Victoria Fraser; Dale N Gerding; Frances A Griffin; Peter Gross; Keith S Kaye; Michael Klompas; Jonas Marschall; Leonard A Mermel; David A Pegues; Trish M Perl; Sanjay Saint; Cassandra D Salgado; Robert A Weinstein; Robert Wise; Deborah S Yokoe Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Sarah L Krein; Laura J Damschroder; Christine P Kowalski; Jane Forman; Timothy P Hofer; Sanjay Saint Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2010-09-28 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Sanjay Saint; Jennifer A Meddings; David Calfee; Christine P Kowalski; Sarah L Krein Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2009-06-16 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Brian Serumaga; Dennis Ross-Degnan; Anthony J Avery; Rachel A Elliott; Sumit R Majumdar; Fang Zhang; Stephen B Soumerai Journal: BMJ Date: 2011-01-25
Authors: Nasia Safdar; Deverick J Anderson; Barbara I Braun; Philip Carling; Stuart Cohen; Curtis Donskey; Marci Drees; Anthony Harris; David K Henderson; Susan S Huang; Manisha Juthani-Mehta; Ebbing Lautenbach; Darren R Linkin; Jennifer Meddings; Loren G Miller; Aaron Milstone; Daniel Morgan; Sharmila Sengupta; Meera Varman; Deborah Yokoe; Danielle M Zerr Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Chanu Rhee; Rui Wang; Maximilian S Jentzsch; Carly Broadwell; Heather Hsu; Robert Jin; Kelly Horan; Grace M Lee Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2018-12-04 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Michael S Calderwood; Ken Kleinman; Susan S Huang; Michael V Murphy; Deborah S Yokoe; Richard Platt Journal: Med Care Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 2.983