Literature DB >> 21166868

The influence of context on quality improvement success in health care: a systematic review of the literature.

Heather C Kaplan1, Patrick W Brady, Michele C Dritz, David K Hooper, W Matthew Linam, Craig M Froehle, Peter Margolis.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The mixed results of success among QI initiatives may be due to differences in the context of these initiatives.
METHODS: The business and health care literature was systematically reviewed to identify contextual factors that might influence QI success; to categorize, summarize, and synthesize these factors; and to understand the current stage of development of this research field.
FINDINGS: Forty-seven articles were included in the final review. Consistent with current theories of implementation and organization change, leadership from top management, organizational culture, data infrastructure and information systems, and years involved in QI were suggested as important to QI success. Other potentially important factors identified in this review included: physician involvement in QI, microsystem motivation to change, resources for QI, and QI team leadership. Key limitations in the existing literature were the lack of a practical conceptual model, the lack of clear definitions of contextual factors, and the lack of well-specified measures.
CONCLUSIONS: Several contextual factors were shown to be important to QI success, although the current body of literature lacks adequate definitions and is characterized by considerable variability in how contextual factors are measured across studies. Future research should focus on identifying and developing measures of context tied to a conceptual model that examines context across all levels of the health care system and explores the relationships among various aspects of context.
© 2010 Milbank Memorial Fund. Published by Wiley Periodicals Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21166868      PMCID: PMC3037175          DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2010.00611.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Milbank Q        ISSN: 0887-378X            Impact factor:   4.911


  47 in total

1.  Managerial implications of corporate board involvement and perceived market competition for quality improvement in nursing homes.

Authors:  R Weech-Maldonado; J S Zinn; D Brannon
Journal:  J Healthc Manag       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct

2.  Organizational culture, continuous quality improvement, and medication administration error reporting.

Authors:  B J Wakefield; M A Blegen; T Uden-Holman; T Vaughn; E Chrischilles; D S Wakefield
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.852

3.  Assessing the factors influencing continuous quality improvement implementation: experience in Korean hospitals.

Authors:  Sunhee Lee; Kui-Son Choi; Hye-Young Kang; Woohyun Cho; Yoo Mi Chae
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.038

4.  Creating the evidence base for quality improvement collaboratives.

Authors:  Brian S Mittman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Characteristics of successful quality improvement teams: lessons from five collaborative projects in the VHA.

Authors:  Peter D Mills; William B Weeks
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Saf       Date:  2004-03

6.  One-year follow-up after a collaborative breakthrough series on reducing falls and fall-related injuries.

Authors:  Julia Neily; Kierston Howard; Patricia Quigley; Peter D Mills
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2005-05

7.  The role of organizational infrastructure in implementation of hospitals' quality improvement.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Alexander; Bryan J Weiner; Stephen M Shortell; Laurence C Baker; Mark P Becker
Journal:  Hosp Top       Date:  2006

Review 8.  A report card on continuous quality improvement.

Authors:  D Blumenthal; C M Kilo
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.911

9.  The role of perceived team effectiveness in improving chronic illness care.

Authors:  Stephen M Shortell; Jill A Marsteller; Michael Lin; Marjorie L Pearson; Shin-Yi Wu; Peter Mendel; Shan Cretin; Mayde Rosen
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Effects of a quality improvement collaborative on the outcome of care of patients with HIV infection: the EQHIV study.

Authors:  Bruce E Landon; Ira B Wilson; Keith McInnes; Mary Beth Landrum; Lisa Hirschhorn; Peter V Marsden; David Gustafson; Paul D Cleary
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  191 in total

1.  Implementation of Electronic Health Records and Entrepreneurial Strategic Orientation in Substance Use Disorder Treatment Organizations.

Authors:  Dail Fields; Kelly Riesenmy; Terry C Blum; Paul M Roman
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.582

2.  The Evidence-based Practice for Improving Quality method has greater impact on improvement of outcomes than dissemination of practice change guidelines and quality improvement training in neonatal intensive care units.

Authors:  Shoo K Lee; Khalid Aziz; Nalini Singhal; Catherine M Cronin
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.253

3.  Prescribing with indication: uptake of regulations in current practice and patients opinions in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Inge G A Holsappel; Ellen S Koster; Nina A Winters; Marcel L Bouvy
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2013-12-14

4.  Context matters: the experience of 14 research teams in systematically reporting contextual factors important for practice change.

Authors:  Andrada Tomoaia-Cotisel; Debra L Scammon; Norman J Waitzman; Peter F Cronholm; Jacqueline R Halladay; David L Driscoll; Leif I Solberg; Clarissa Hsu; Ming Tai-Seale; Vanessa Hiratsuka; Sarah C Shih; Michael D Fetters; Christopher G Wise; Jeffrey A Alexander; Diane Hauser; Carmit K McMullen; Sarah Hudson Scholle; Manasi A Tirodkar; Laura Schmidt; Katrina E Donahue; Michael L Parchman; Kurt C Stange
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Implementation of Network for the Improvement of Addiction Treatment (NIATx) Processes in Substance Use Disorder Treatment Centers.

Authors:  Dail Fields; Hannah K Knudsen; Paul M Roman
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.505

6.  The role of information technology in translating educational interventions into practice: an analysis using the PRECEDE/PROCEED model.

Authors:  Charlene Weir; Nanci McLeskey; Cherie Brunker; Denise Brooks; Mark A Supiano
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Partnering health disparities research with quality improvement science in pediatrics.

Authors:  K Casey Lion; Jean L Raphael
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  The Feasibility of Tracking Elective Deliveries Prior to 39 Gestational Weeks: Lessons From Three California Projects.

Authors:  Lisa M Korst; Moshe Fridman; Melanie Estarziau; Kimberly D Gregory; Connie Mitchell
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-10

9.  Contextual Factors Associated With Quality Improvement Success in a Multisite Ambulatory Setting.

Authors:  Lindsey C Douglas; Moonseong Heo; Namita Azad; Andrew D Racine; Michael L Rinke
Journal:  J Healthc Qual       Date:  2019 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 1.095

10.  Catching and Correcting Unreported, Under-Reported Accidents (Near-Misses) among Healthcare Provider in Thailand.

Authors:  Pimpan Silpasuwan; Chukeat Viwatwongasame; Pornpimol Kongtip; Adul Bandhukul; Thida Omas; Susan Woskie
Journal:  Arch Med (Oviedo)       Date:  2017-03-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.