Literature DB >> 32620386

Direct Activation of Cortical Neurons in the Primary Somatosensory Cortex of the Rat in Vivo Using Focused Ultrasound.

Kush Tripathi1, Tongsheng Zhang2, Nathan McDannold3, Yong-Zhi Zhang3, Gösta Ehnholm4, Yoshio Okada5.   

Abstract

We address the recent controversy over whether focused ultrasound (FUS) activates cortical neurons directly or indirectly by initially activating auditory pathways. We obtained two types of evidence that FUS can directly activate cortical neurons. The depth profile of the local field potential (LFP) in the barrel cortex of the rat in vivo indicated a generator was located within the cortical gray matter. The onset and peak latencies of the initial component p1 were 3.2 ± 0.25 ms (mean ± standard error of the mean) and 7.6 ± 0.12 ms, respectively, for the direct cortical response (DCR), 6.8 ± 0.40 and 14.3 ± 0.54 ms for the FUS-evoked LFP (4 MHz, 3.2 MPa, 50 or 300 µs/pulse, 1-20 pulses at 1 kHz) and 6.9 ± 0.51 and 15.8 ± 0.94 ms for the LFP evoked by 1-ms deflection of the C2 whisker projecting to the same area. The peak latency of the FUS p1 was statistically (t-test) longer than the DCR, but shorter than the whisker p1 at p < 0.005.
Copyright © 2020 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barrel cortex; Direct cortical stimulation; Focused ultrasound; Laminar analysis; Local field potential; Somatosensory cortex; Whisker

Year:  2020        PMID: 32620386      PMCID: PMC7431189          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  29 in total

1.  Synchronized spikes of thalamocortical axonal terminals and cortical neurons are detectable outside the pig brain with MEG.

Authors:  Hiroaki Ikeda; Leonard Leyba; Anton Bartolo; Yaozhi Wang; Yoshio C Okada
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The spread of activity in the cerebral cortex.

Authors:  E D Adrian
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1936-11-06       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Modification by focused ultrasound pulses of electrically evoked responses from an in vitro hippocampal preparation.

Authors:  P C Rinaldi; J P Jones; F Reines; L R Price
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1991-08-30       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Elimination of peripheral auditory pathway activation does not affect motor responses from ultrasound neuromodulation.

Authors:  Morteza Mohammadjavadi; Patrick Peiyong Ye; Anping Xia; Julian Brown; Gerald Popelka; Kim Butts Pauly
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 8.955

5.  Transcranial focused ultrasound modulates the activity of primary somatosensory cortex in humans.

Authors:  Wynn Legon; Tomokazu F Sato; Alexander Opitz; Jerel Mueller; Aaron Barbour; Amanda Williams; William J Tyler
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Current source-density and neuromagnetic analysis of the direct cortical response in rat cortex.

Authors:  D S Barth; W Sutherling
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1988-05-31       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 7.  Ultrasonic modulation of neural circuit activity.

Authors:  William J Tyler; Shane W Lani; Grace M Hwang
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 6.627

8.  High-frequency, low-intensity ultrasound and microbubbles enhance nerve blockade.

Authors:  Kathleen Cullion; Claudia M Santamaria; Changyou Zhan; David Zurakowski; Tao Sun; Grant L Pemberton; Nathan J McDannold; Daniel S Kohane
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 9.776

9.  Voltage-gated channel mechanosensitivity: fact or friction?

Authors:  Catherine E Morris
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Remote excitation of neuronal circuits using low-intensity, low-frequency ultrasound.

Authors:  William J Tyler; Yusuf Tufail; Michael Finsterwald; Monica L Tauchmann; Emily J Olson; Cassondra Majestic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.