BACKGROUND: The Afinion HbA1c (Axis-Shield) is a newer point-of-care device for measurement of hemoglobin A1c (A1C) using a boronate affinity method unlike the more commonly used DCA immunoassay method (Siemens Medical Solutions Diagnostics). The Afinion's accuracy and precision, when compared with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and DCA methods, have not been established in pediatric practice settings. METHODS: Capillary blood was collected from 700 subjects with diabetes mellitus at seven Pediatric Diabetes Consortium sites. Each subject's A1C was measured locally using Afinion and DCA devices, and by a central laboratory (University of Minnesota) using a Tosoh HPLC method. In addition, repeated measurements on six whole blood samples provided by the National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP) were taken at three clinical centers using the Afinion and DCA methods and centrally using the Tosoh HPLC method to assess the precision of each device. RESULTS: The coefficient of variation for measurements of whole blood samples for precision analysis was 2% for Afinion, 3% for DCA, and 1% for HPLC. In the patient samples measured at the seven clinic sites, the Afinion generated higher A1C results than the HPLC (mean difference = +0.15; p < 0.001), while the DCA produced lower values (mean difference = -0.19; p < 0.001). The absolute differences with HPLC were similar for the Afinion and DCA (median 0.2%) with a slight advantage for the Afinion when compared with DCA (p < 0.001 by rank test). The DCA tended to read lower than HPLC, particularly at high A1C levels (p < 0.001), while the Afinion's accuracy did not vary by A1C. CONCLUSIONS: When compared to the central laboratory HPLC method, the differences between the results of the Afinion and DCA devices are clinically insignificant, and the Afinion and DCA have similar accuracy and precision when used in pediatric practice settings.
BACKGROUND: The Afinion HbA1c (Axis-Shield) is a newer point-of-care device for measurement of hemoglobin A1c (A1C) using a boronate affinity method unlike the more commonly used DCA immunoassay method (Siemens Medical Solutions Diagnostics). The Afinion's accuracy and precision, when compared with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and DCA methods, have not been established in pediatric practice settings. METHODS: Capillary blood was collected from 700 subjects with diabetes mellitus at seven Pediatric Diabetes Consortium sites. Each subject's A1C was measured locally using Afinion and DCA devices, and by a central laboratory (University of Minnesota) using a Tosoh HPLC method. In addition, repeated measurements on six whole blood samples provided by the National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP) were taken at three clinical centers using the Afinion and DCA methods and centrally using the Tosoh HPLC method to assess the precision of each device. RESULTS: The coefficient of variation for measurements of whole blood samples for precision analysis was 2% for Afinion, 3% for DCA, and 1% for HPLC. In the patient samples measured at the seven clinic sites, the Afinion generated higher A1C results than the HPLC (mean difference = +0.15; p < 0.001), while the DCA produced lower values (mean difference = -0.19; p < 0.001). The absolute differences with HPLC were similar for the Afinion and DCA (median 0.2%) with a slight advantage for the Afinion when compared with DCA (p < 0.001 by rank test). The DCA tended to read lower than HPLC, particularly at high A1C levels (p < 0.001), while the Afinion's accuracy did not vary by A1C. CONCLUSIONS: When compared to the central laboratory HPLC method, the differences between the results of the Afinion and DCA devices are clinically insignificant, and the Afinion and DCA have similar accuracy and precision when used in pediatric practice settings.
Authors: John R Petersen; Jane B Finley; Anthony O Okorodudu; Amin A Mohammad; James J Grady; Mandeep Bajaj Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: B Guerci; D Durain; H Leblanc; J C Rouland; P Passa; T Godeau; B Charbonnel; J C Mathieu Daude; H Boniface; L Monnier; F Dauchy; G Slama; P Drouin Journal: Diabetes Metab Date: 1997-06 Impact factor: 6.041
Authors: William V Tamborlane; Craig Kollman; Michael W Steffes; Katrina J Ruedy; Xing Dongyuan; Roy W Beck; Peter Chase; Larry A Fox; Darrell M Wilson; Eva Tsalikian Journal: Pediatr Diabetes Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 4.866
Authors: Christopher D Miller; Catherine S Barnes; Lawrence S Phillips; David C Ziemer; Daniel L Gallina; Curtiss B Cook; Sandra D Maryman; Imad M El-Kebbi Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Elizabeth B Lynch; Laurin Mack; Elizabeth Avery; Yamin Wang; Rebecca Dawar; DeJuran Richardson; Kathryn Keim; Jennifer Ventrelle; Bradley M Appelhans; Bettina Tahsin; Leon Fogelfeld Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-04-08 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Elizabeth B Lynch; Rebecca Liebman; Jennifer Ventrelle; Kathryn Keim; Bradley M Appelhans; Elizabeth F Avery; Bettina Tahsin; Hong Li; Merle Shapera; Leon Fogelfeld Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2014-09-22 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Paul K Drain; Emily P Hyle; Farzad Noubary; Kenneth A Freedberg; Douglas Wilson; William R Bishai; William Rodriguez; Ingrid V Bassett Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2013-12-10 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: Elizabeth A Pyatak; Kristine Carandang; Cheryl L P Vigen; Jeanine Blanchard; Jesus Diaz; Alyssa Concha-Chavez; Paola A Sequeira; Jamie R Wood; Robin Whittemore; Donna Spruijt-Metz; Anne L Peters Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2018-01-19 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Elizabeth Lynch; Laurin J Mack; Kelly Karavolos; Elizabeth Avery; Rebecca Liebman; Kathryn S Keim; Crystal M Glover; Leon Fogelfeld Journal: J Health Care Poor Underserved Date: 2017
Authors: Cheryl L P Vigen; Kristine Carandang; Jeanine Blanchard; Paola A Sequeira; Jamie R Wood; Donna Spruijt-Metz; Robin Whittemore; Anne L Peters; Elizabeth A Pyatak Journal: Diabetes Educ Date: 2018-10-08 Impact factor: 2.140
Authors: Roy William Mayega; David Guwatudde; Fredrick Makumbi; Frederick Nelson Nakwagala; Stefan Peterson; Goran Tomson; Claes-Goran Ostenson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-08-14 Impact factor: 3.240