BACKGROUND: Measurement of HbA1c is the most important parameter to assess glycemic control in diabetic patients. Different point-of-care devices for HbA1c are available. The aim of this study was to evaluate two point-of-care testing (POCT) analyzers (DCA Vantage from Siemens and Afinion from Axis-Shield). We studied the bias and precision as well as interference from carbamylated hemoglobin. METHODS: Bias of the POCT analyzers was obtained by measuring 53 blood samples from diabetic patients with a wide range of HbA1c, 4%-14% (20-130 mmol/mol), and comparing the results with those obtained by the laboratory method: HPLC HA 8160 Menarini. Precision was performed by 20 successive determinations of two samples with low 4.2% (22 mmol/mol) and high 9.5% (80 mmol/mol) HbA1c values. The possible interference from carbamylated hemoglobin was studied using 25 samples from patients with chronic renal failure. RESULTS: The means of the differences between measurements performed by each POCT analyzer and the laboratory method (95% confidence interval) were: 0.28% (p<0.005) (0.10-0.44) for DCA and 0.27% (p<0.001) (0.19-0.35) for Afinion. Correlation coefficients were: r=0.973 for DCA, and r=0.991 for Afinion. The mean bias observed by using samples from chronic renal failure patients were 0.2 (range -0.4, 0.4) for DCA and 0.2 (-0.2, 0.5) for Afinion. Imprecision results were: CV=3.1% (high HbA1c) and 2.97% (low HbA1c) for DCA, CV=1.95% (high HbA1c) and 2.66% (low HbA1c) for Afinion. CONCLUSIONS: Both POCT analyzers for HbA1c show good correlation with the laboratory method and acceptable precision.
BACKGROUND: Measurement of HbA1c is the most important parameter to assess glycemic control in diabeticpatients. Different point-of-care devices for HbA1c are available. The aim of this study was to evaluate two point-of-care testing (POCT) analyzers (DCA Vantage from Siemens and Afinion from Axis-Shield). We studied the bias and precision as well as interference from carbamylated hemoglobin. METHODS: Bias of the POCT analyzers was obtained by measuring 53 blood samples from diabeticpatients with a wide range of HbA1c, 4%-14% (20-130 mmol/mol), and comparing the results with those obtained by the laboratory method: HPLC HA 8160 Menarini. Precision was performed by 20 successive determinations of two samples with low 4.2% (22 mmol/mol) and high 9.5% (80 mmol/mol) HbA1c values. The possible interference from carbamylated hemoglobin was studied using 25 samples from patients with chronic renal failure. RESULTS: The means of the differences between measurements performed by each POCT analyzer and the laboratory method (95% confidence interval) were: 0.28% (p<0.005) (0.10-0.44) for DCA and 0.27% (p<0.001) (0.19-0.35) for Afinion. Correlation coefficients were: r=0.973 for DCA, and r=0.991 for Afinion. The mean bias observed by using samples from chronic renal failurepatients were 0.2 (range -0.4, 0.4) for DCA and 0.2 (-0.2, 0.5) for Afinion. Imprecision results were: CV=3.1% (high HbA1c) and 2.97% (low HbA1c) for DCA, CV=1.95% (high HbA1c) and 2.66% (low HbA1c) for Afinion. CONCLUSIONS: Both POCT analyzers for HbA1c show good correlation with the laboratory method and acceptable precision.
Authors: Jamie R Wood; Brett M Kaminski; Craig Kollman; Roy W Beck; Callyn A Hall; Jason P Yun; Eda Cengiz; Michael J Haller; Krishna Hassan; Georgeanna J Klingensmith; William V Tamborlane Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2012-03-01
Authors: Elizabeth A Pyatak; Kristine Carandang; Cheryl Vigen; Jeanine Blanchard; Paola A Sequeira; Jamie R Wood; Donna Spruijt-Metz; Robin Whittemore; Anne L Peters Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2017-01-05 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Nigel Unwin; Christina Howitt; Angela Mc Rose; T Alafia Samuels; Anselm Jm Hennis; Ian R Hambleton Journal: J Glob Health Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 4.413
Authors: Floris van Raalten; Yasmine L Hiemstra; Noor Keulen; Yoni van Duivenvoorde; Katrin Stoecklein; Evert A Verhagen; Christa Boer Journal: J Clin Monit Comput Date: 2019-01-18 Impact factor: 2.502
Authors: Ruziana Mona Wan Mohd Zin; Zati Iwani Ahmad Kamil; Tuan Rosidah Tuan Soh; Mustaffa Embong; Wan Nazaimoon Wan Mohamud Journal: BMC Res Notes Date: 2013-12-18