BACKGROUND: Multiple factors impact subcutaneous insulin injection pain. Injection devices [e.g., syringe or pen needle (PN)] affect pain due to needle length, diameter, needle polishing and lubrication, and needle tip geometry. METHODS: We evaluated a modified 5-bevel PN tip in 32 G × 4 mm 31 G × 5 mm and 8 mm PNs vs the equivalent marketed 3-bevel PNs in laboratory penetration force testing, as well as in insulin-taking subjects for overall acceptability, comparative pain, and preference. The clinical tests were done in three ways: paired insertions with the subjects blinded to PN tip geometry, after brief at-home use of 5-bevel PNs, and again with subjects informed about each needle's tip geometry in paired insertions. RESULTS:Average penetration force in a skin substitute was 23% lower with the 5-bevel PNs vs similar 3-bevel PNs (p ≤ 0.01). In blinded testing and after at-home use, patients rated the 5-bevel needle as acceptable. After shortterm home use, patients rated the 5-bevel PN less painful and preferable to their usual PN (both p < 0.01). In paired, informed testing, the 5-bevel PN was less painful and preferred to subjects' currently used needles (p ≤ 0.01) and to other marketed PNs (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Needle tip geometry affects penetration force. When blinded, patients did not distinguish differences in PN tip geometry with fine-gauge PN insertions. A 5-bevel needle tip is perceived as less painful and is preferred by subjects following home use for usual injections. Similar results occurred when patients were informed that they were using a needle with a modified tip.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Multiple factors impact subcutaneous insulin injection pain. Injection devices [e.g., syringe or pen needle (PN)] affect pain due to needle length, diameter, needle polishing and lubrication, and needle tip geometry. METHODS: We evaluated a modified 5-bevel PN tip in 32 G × 4 mm 31 G × 5 mm and 8 mm PNs vs the equivalent marketed 3-bevel PNs in laboratory penetration force testing, as well as in insulin-taking subjects for overall acceptability, comparative pain, and preference. The clinical tests were done in three ways: paired insertions with the subjects blinded to PN tip geometry, after brief at-home use of 5-bevel PNs, and again with subjects informed about each needle's tip geometry in paired insertions. RESULTS: Average penetration force in a skin substitute was 23% lower with the 5-bevel PNs vs similar 3-bevel PNs (p ≤ 0.01). In blinded testing and after at-home use, patients rated the 5-bevel needle as acceptable. After shortterm home use, patients rated the 5-bevel PN less painful and preferable to their usual PN (both p < 0.01). In paired, informed testing, the 5-bevel PN was less painful and preferred to subjects' currently used needles (p ≤ 0.01) and to other marketed PNs (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Needle tip geometry affects penetration force. When blinded, patients did not distinguish differences in PN tip geometry with fine-gauge PN insertions. A 5-bevel needle tip is perceived as less painful and is preferred by subjects following home use for usual injections. Similar results occurred when patients were informed that they were using a needle with a modified tip.
Authors: Laurence J Hirsch; Michael A Gibney; John Albanese; Shankang Qu; Kenneth Kassler-Taub; Leslie J Klaff; Timothy S Bailey Journal: Curr Med Res Opin Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 2.580
Authors: Christopher Rini; Bruce C Roberts; Didier Morel; Rick Klug; Benjamin Selvage; Ronald J Pettis Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2019-03-17
Authors: Ryan S Clement; Erica L Unger; Olga M Ocón-Grove; Thomas L Cronin; Maureen L Mulvihill Journal: J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 1.232
Authors: Elimor Brand-Schieber; Sagar Munjal; Rajesh Kumar; Anthony D Andre; Will Valladao; Margarita Ramirez Journal: Med Devices (Auckl) Date: 2016-05-30