Literature DB >> 20429832

Comparative glycemic control, safety and patient ratings for a new 4 mm x 32G insulin pen needle in adults with diabetes.

Laurence J Hirsch1, Michael A Gibney, John Albanese, Shankang Qu, Kenneth Kassler-Taub, Leslie J Klaff, Timothy S Bailey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Pen needles (PN) for subcutaneous insulin therapy have become smaller; 5 mm PNs are now the shortest in use. We evaluated the safety, efficacy and patient ratings of a new 4 mm x 32 gauge (G) PN. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Subjects with type 1 and type 2 diabetes and HbA1c 5.5% to 9.5% participated in a randomized non-inferiority cross-over trial, at four U.S. centers. Subjects used 4 mm x 32G PNs and either 5 mm x 31G PNs (4/5 mm) or 8 mm x 31G PNs (4/8 mm) in two, 3-week treatment periods; order of needle use was controlled. Subjects were either 'low dose' or 'regular dose' users (highest single insulin dose <or= 20 units and 21-40 units, respectively). Percent absolute change in serum fructosamine (% |Delta Fru|) was the primary endpoint; unexplained, severe hypo- or hyperglycemia was a secondary measure. Leakage at injection sites and pain measured by visual analog scale were tertiary measures. Equivalent glycemic control was defined á priori as % |Delta Fru| (including 95% CI) within 20%; 40 subjects per subgroup provides 90% power at alpha = 0.05. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov (identifier: NCT00928057).
RESULTS: Of 173 subjects randomized, 168 completed the study, and 163 were included in the fructosamine analyses--83 and 80 in the 4/5 mm and 4/8 mm groups, respectively. Subjects were 56% male, mean 52.6 yrs, 63% type 2. Baseline HbA1c = 7.5 +/- 1.0% and fructosamine 301 +/- 55.1 micromol/L. Mean % |Delta Fru| was 4.9% (95% CI 3.8, 6.0) and 5.5% (4.5, 6.4), respectively, for the 4/5 mm and 4/8 mm groups, meeting glycemic equivalence criteria; results were similar in both dose groups. The median |Delta Fru| was 11.0 micromol/L (8.0, 13.0) and 13.5 micromol/L (9.8, 18.0) for the 4/5 mm and 4/8 mm groups, respectively. Unexplained, severe hypo- and hyperglycemic episodes were infrequent and not different between PNs. The 4 mm PN was rated significantly less painful and preferred by approximately 2/3 of subjects (p < 0.01). All three PNs had similar reported injection site leakage. LIMITATIONS: The study was of relatively short duration, in adults in the U.S. Further trials in other patients (e.g., GLP-1 users, pediatrics, obese) should be performed.
CONCLUSIONS: The 4 mm x 32G PN provided equivalent glycemic control compared to 31G, 5 mm and 8 mm PNs with reduced pain, no difference in insulin leakage and was preferred by patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20429832     DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2010.482499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  30 in total

1.  Analysis and perspective: comparison of insulin diluent leakage post-injection using two different needle lengths and injection volumes in obese patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Timothy S Bailey
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-03-01

Review 2.  The role of comfort and discomfort in insulin therapy.

Authors:  Ronnie Aronson
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 6.118

3.  Impact of a modified needle tip geometry on penetration force as well as acceptability, preference, and perceived pain in subjects with diabetes.

Authors:  Laurence Hirsch; Michael Gibney; Julie Berube; John Manocchio
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-03-01

4.  Subcutaneous Insulin Administration: Sufficient Progress or Ongoing Need?

Authors:  Ronald J Pettis; Douglas Muchmore; Lutz Heinemann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-12-07

5.  Skin blood perfusion and cellular response to insertion of insulin pen needles with different diameters.

Authors:  Kezia Ann Præstmark; Casper Bo Jensen; Bente Stallknecht; Nils Berg Madsen; Jonas Kildegaard
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-04-17

6.  Systematic Review of Device Parameters and Design of Studies Bridging Biologic-Device Combination Products Using Prefilled Syringes and Autoinjectors.

Authors:  Ping Hu; Jie Wang; Jeffery Florian; Katherine Shatzer; Alan M Stevens; Jacqueline Gertz; Ping Ji; Shiew Mei Huang; Issam Zineh; Yow-Ming C Wang
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 4.009

7.  Subcutaneous Injection Depth Does Not Affect the Pharmacokinetics or Glucodynamics of Insulin Lispro in Normal Weight or Healthy Obese Subjects.

Authors:  Amparo de la Peña; Kwee P Yeo; Helle Linnebjerg; Edward Catton; Shobha Reddy; Patricia Brown-Augsburger; Linda Morrow; Debra A Ignaut
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-02-19

Review 8.  What can we learn from patient-reported outcomes of insulin pen devices?

Authors:  Barbara J Anderson; Maria J Redondo
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-11-01

9.  Injection Technique and Pen Needle Design Affect Leakage From Skin After Subcutaneous Injections.

Authors:  Kezia Ann Præstmark; Bente Stallknecht; Morten Lind Jensen; Thomas Sparre; Nils Berg Madsen; Jonas Kildegaard
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-06-28

Review 10.  Patient preferences for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a scoping review.

Authors:  Susan M Joy; Emily Little; Nisa M Maruthur; Tanjala S Purnell; John F P Bridges
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.