Literature DB >> 11145767

Determining the minimum clinically significant difference in visual analog pain score for children.

C V Powell1, A M Kelly, A Williams.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the minimum clinically significant difference in visual analog scale (VAS) pain score for children.
METHODS: We performed a prospective, single-group, repeated-measures study of children between 8 and 15 years presenting to an urban pediatric emergency department with acute pain. On presentation to the ED, patients marked the level of their pain on a 100-mm nonhatched VAS scale. At 20-minute intervals thereafter, they were asked to give a verbal categoric rating of their pain as "heaps better," "a bit better," "much the same," "a bit worse," or "heaps worse" and to mark the level of pain on a VAS scale of the same type as used previously. A maximum of 3 comparisons was recorded for each child. The minimum clinically significant difference in VAS pain score was defined as the mean difference between current and preceding scores when the subject reported "a bit worse" or "a bit better" pain.
RESULTS: Seventy-three children were enrolled in the study, yielding 103 evaluable comparisons in which pain was rated as "a bit better" or "a bit worse." The minimum clinically significant difference in VAS score was 10 mm (95% confidence interval 7 to 12 mm).
CONCLUSION: This study found the minimum clinically significant difference in VAS pain score for children aged 8 to 15 years (on a 100-mm VAS scale) to be 10 mm (95% confidence interval 7 to 12 mm). In studies of populations, differences of less than this amount, even if statistically significant, are unlikely to be of clinical significance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11145767     DOI: 10.1067/mem.2001.111517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  51 in total

1.  A comparison of topical menthol to ice on pain, evoked tetanic and voluntary force during delayed onset muscle soreness.

Authors:  Pramod Johar; Varun Grover; Robert Topp; David G Behm
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-06

2.  Impact of a modified needle tip geometry on penetration force as well as acceptability, preference, and perceived pain in subjects with diabetes.

Authors:  Laurence Hirsch; Michael Gibney; Julie Berube; John Manocchio
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-03-01

Review 3.  Oral cyclo-oxygenase 2 inhibitors versus other oral analgesics for acute soft tissue injury: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peter Jones; Rain Lamdin
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 4.  Quality of life outcomes after functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Zachary M Soler; Timothy L Smith
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 5.  Is manipulative therapy clinically necessary for relief of neck pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Min Yao; Yue-Li Sun; Rong-Liang Dun; Tian-Ying Lan; Jin-Long Li; Hyo Jin Lee; Noriko Haraguchi; Yong-Jun Wang; Xue-Jun Cui
Journal:  Chin J Integr Med       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 1.978

6.  Reducing pain from heel lances in neonates following education on oral sucrose.

Authors:  Mark Shen; Gladys El-Chaar
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2015-03-06

7.  Postoperative self-report of pain in children: interscale agreement, response to analgesic, and preference for a faces scale and a visual analogue scale.

Authors:  Clément de Tovar; Carl L von Baeyer; Chantal Wood; Jean-Pierre Alibeu; Malik Houfani; Charles Arvieux
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.037

8.  The Reliability of Remembered Pretreatment Visual Analog Scale Scores among Hand-Surgery Patients.

Authors:  Vilhjalmur Finsen; Sigrun Hillesund; Ida Fromreide
Journal:  J Hand Microsurg       Date:  2019-04-17

9.  Treatment of nasal septal perforations with a custom-made prosthesis.

Authors:  Anna Blind; Antti Hulterström; Diana Berggren
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Clinically meaningful measurement of pain in children with sickle cell disease.

Authors:  Matthew P Myrvik; Amanda M Brandow; Amy L Drendel; Ke Yan; Raymond G Hoffmann; Julie A Panepinto
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 3.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.