PURPOSE: To estimate the prevalence of near vision impairment and use of corrective spectacles among middle-aged and older adults in different settings and ethnic groups. DESIGN: Population-based, cross-sectional study. METHODS: People aged ≥ 35 years were randomly selected with cluster sampling in 4 rural settings in Shunyi (China), Kaski (Nepal), Madurai (India), and Dosso (Niger); 1 semi-urban area in Durban (South Africa); and 2 urban settings in Guangzhou (China) and Los Angeles (USA). Near visual acuity (VA), with and without presenting near correction, was measured at 40 cm using a logMAR near vision tumbling E chart. Subjects with uncorrected binocular near VA ≤ 20/40 were tested with plus spheres to obtain the best-corrected binocular VA. RESULTS: A total of 17 734 persons aged ≥ 35 years were enumerated and 14 805 (83.5%) were examined. The age- and sex-standardized prevalence of uncorrected near vision impairment (VA ≤ 20/40) ranged from 49% in Dosso to 60% in Shunyi and Guangzhou, 65% in Kaski and Los Angeles, and 83% in Madurai and Durban. The prevalence of near vision impairment based on best-corrected visual acuity was less than 10% in Guangzhou, Kaski, Durban, and Los Angeles, but as high as 23% in Madurai. In multiple logistic regression models, uncorrected near vision impairment was associated with older age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.14, P < .001) and female sex (OR = 1.12, P = .027), but not with educational level (OR = 1.01, P = .812). Over 90% of people in need of near refractive correction in rural settings did not have the necessary spectacles. These rates were 40% in urban settings. CONCLUSIONS: By 50 years of age, the majority of people suffer from near vision impairment, most of which can be corrected optically. Over 90% of those in need of near refractive correction in rural settings do not have the necessary spectacles.
PURPOSE: To estimate the prevalence of near vision impairment and use of corrective spectacles among middle-aged and older adults in different settings and ethnic groups. DESIGN: Population-based, cross-sectional study. METHODS:People aged ≥ 35 years were randomly selected with cluster sampling in 4 rural settings in Shunyi (China), Kaski (Nepal), Madurai (India), and Dosso (Niger); 1 semi-urban area in Durban (South Africa); and 2 urban settings in Guangzhou (China) and Los Angeles (USA). Near visual acuity (VA), with and without presenting near correction, was measured at 40 cm using a logMAR near vision tumbling E chart. Subjects with uncorrected binocular near VA ≤ 20/40 were tested with plus spheres to obtain the best-corrected binocular VA. RESULTS: A total of 17 734 persons aged ≥ 35 years were enumerated and 14 805 (83.5%) were examined. The age- and sex-standardized prevalence of uncorrected near vision impairment (VA ≤ 20/40) ranged from 49% in Dosso to 60% in Shunyi and Guangzhou, 65% in Kaski and Los Angeles, and 83% in Madurai and Durban. The prevalence of near vision impairment based on best-corrected visual acuity was less than 10% in Guangzhou, Kaski, Durban, and Los Angeles, but as high as 23% in Madurai. In multiple logistic regression models, uncorrected near vision impairment was associated with older age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.14, P < .001) and female sex (OR = 1.12, P = .027), but not with educational level (OR = 1.01, P = .812). Over 90% of people in need of near refractive correction in rural settings did not have the necessary spectacles. These rates were 40% in urban settings. CONCLUSIONS: By 50 years of age, the majority of people suffer from near vision impairment, most of which can be corrected optically. Over 90% of those in need of near refractive correction in rural settings do not have the necessary spectacles.
Authors: Mingguang He; Amza Abdou; Leon B Ellwein; Kovin S Naidoo; Yuddha D Sapkota; R D Thulasiraj; Rohit Varma; Jialiang Zhao; Ivo Kocur; Nathan G Congdon Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2013-08-30 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Cécile Delcourt; Jean-François Korobelnik; Gabriëlle H S Buitendijk; Paul J Foster; Christopher J Hammond; Stefano Piermarocchi; Tunde Peto; Nomdo Jansonius; Alireza Mirshahi; Ruth E Hogg; Lionel Bretillon; Fotis Topouzis; Gabor Deak; Jakob Grauslund; Rebecca Broe; Eric H Souied; Catherine Creuzot-Garcher; José Sahel; Vincent Daien; Terho Lehtimäki; Hans-Werner Hense; Elena Prokofyeva; Konrad Oexle; Jugnoo S Rahi; Phillippa M Cumberland; Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg; Sascha Fauser; Geir Bertelsen; Carel Hoyng; Arthur Bergen; Rufino Silva; Sebastian Wolf; Andrew Lotery; Usha Chakravarthy; Astrid Fletcher; Caroline C W Klaver Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2015-12-19 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Rupert R A Bourne; Jost B Jonas; Alain M Bron; Maria Vittoria Cicinelli; Aditi Das; Seth R Flaxman; David S Friedman; Jill E Keeffe; John H Kempen; Janet Leasher; Hans Limburg; Kovin Naidoo; Konrad Pesudovs; Tunde Peto; Jinan Saadine; Alexander J Silvester; Nina Tahhan; Hugh R Taylor; Rohit Varma; Tien Y Wong; Serge Resnikoff Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2018-03-15 Impact factor: 4.638