Jost B Jonas1, Ningli Wang2, Vinay Nangia3. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the Ruprecht-Karls-University of Heidelberg, Seegartenklinik Heidelberg, Germany, Suraj Eye Institute, Nagpur, India, Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Science Key Lab, Beijing, China. 2. Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Beijing, China. 3. Suraj Eye Institute, Nagpur, India.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that taking translamina pressure difference into consideration changes associations between ocular perfusion pressure and glaucomatous optic neuropathy. METHODS: The population-based Central India Eye and Medical Study included 4711 subjects. Ocular perfusion pressure was calculated as follows: ⅔ [diastolic blood pressure + ⅓ × (systolic blood pressure - diastolic blood pressure)] - IOP. Cerebrospinal fluid pressure (mm Hg) was estimated as follows: 0.44 body mass index (kg/m(2)) + 0.16 diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) - 0.18 × age (years) - 1.91. Translamina pressure difference was IOP minus cerebrospinal fluid pressure. RESULTS: In multivariate analysis, higher open-angle glaucoma prevalence was associaed with higher IOP (P<.001; odds ratio [OR], 1.19; 95% CI, 1.15, 1.24) or with higher translamina pressure difference (P<.001; OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.10, 1.19), but not with ocular perfusion pressure (P<.37). A smaller neuroretinal rim area was correlated with higher IOP (P<.001; standardized coefficient beta -0.09) or larger translamina pressure difference (P<.001; β -0.10), but not with ocular perfusion pressure (P=.26). Greater prevalence of angle-closure glaucoma was associated with higher IOP (P<.001; OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.15, 1.28) or higher translamina pressure difference (P<.001; OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.13, 1.25) or lower ocular perfusion pressure (P<.04; OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.90, 0.996). Correlation coefficients were highest for the association with IOP and lowest for ocular perfusion pressure. A smaller rim area was correlated with higher IOP (P<.001; beta -0.08) and higher translamina pressure difference (P<.001; beta -0.08); rim area and ocular perfusion pressure were not significantly associated (P=.25). CONCLUSIONS: The present study provides information on the relationship of translamina pressure difference to the development of optic nerve damage in what is presently called glaucoma. It does not provide support of the idea that ocular perfusion pressure plays a major role in the pathogenesis of optic neuropathy.
PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that taking translamina pressure difference into consideration changes associations between ocular perfusion pressure and glaucomatous optic neuropathy. METHODS: The population-based Central India Eye and Medical Study included 4711 subjects. Ocular perfusion pressure was calculated as follows: ⅔ [diastolic blood pressure + ⅓ × (systolic blood pressure - diastolic blood pressure)] - IOP. Cerebrospinal fluid pressure (mm Hg) was estimated as follows: 0.44 body mass index (kg/m(2)) + 0.16 diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) - 0.18 × age (years) - 1.91. Translamina pressure difference was IOP minus cerebrospinal fluid pressure. RESULTS: In multivariate analysis, higher open-angle glaucoma prevalence was associaed with higher IOP (P<.001; odds ratio [OR], 1.19; 95% CI, 1.15, 1.24) or with higher translamina pressure difference (P<.001; OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.10, 1.19), but not with ocular perfusion pressure (P<.37). A smaller neuroretinal rim area was correlated with higher IOP (P<.001; standardized coefficient beta -0.09) or larger translamina pressure difference (P<.001; β -0.10), but not with ocular perfusion pressure (P=.26). Greater prevalence of angle-closure glaucoma was associated with higher IOP (P<.001; OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.15, 1.28) or higher translamina pressure difference (P<.001; OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.13, 1.25) or lower ocular perfusion pressure (P<.04; OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.90, 0.996). Correlation coefficients were highest for the association with IOP and lowest for ocular perfusion pressure. A smaller rim area was correlated with higher IOP (P<.001; beta -0.08) and higher translamina pressure difference (P<.001; beta -0.08); rim area and ocular perfusion pressure were not significantly associated (P=.25). CONCLUSIONS: The present study provides information on the relationship of translamina pressure difference to the development of optic nerve damage in what is presently called glaucoma. It does not provide support of the idea that ocular perfusion pressure plays a major role in the pathogenesis of optic neuropathy.
Authors: W H Morgan; D Y Yu; V A Alder; S J Cringle; R L Cooper; P H House; I J Constable Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 1998-07 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: John P Berdahl; David Fleischman; Jana Zaydlarova; Sandra Stinnett; R Rand Allingham; Michael P Fautsch Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2012-03-15 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Anmar Abdul-Rahman; William Morgan; Ying Jo Khoo; Christopher Lind; Allan Kermode; William Carroll; Dao-Yi Yu Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-06-28 Impact factor: 3.752