Literature DB >> 18457856

Contrast detection in infants with fragile X syndrome.

F Farzin1, D Whitney, R J Hagerman, S M Rivera.   

Abstract

Studies have reported that a selective deficit in visual motion processing is present in certain developmental disorders, including Williams syndrome and autism. More recent evidence suggests a visual motion impairment is also present in adults with fragile X syndrome (FXS), the most common form of inherited mental retardation. The goal of the current study was to examine low-level cortical visual processing in infants diagnosed with FXS in order to explore the developmental origin of this putative deficit. We measured contrast detection of first-order (luminance-defined) and second-order (contrast-defined) gratings at two levels of temporal frequency, 0 Hz (static) and 4 Hz (moving). Results indicate that infants with FXS display significantly higher detection thresholds only for the second-order, moving stimuli compared to mental age-matched typically developing controls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18457856      PMCID: PMC2486371          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.03.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  66 in total

1.  A computational model of the analysis of some first-order and second-order motion patterns by simple and complex cells.

Authors:  A Johnston; P W McOwan; H Buxton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1992-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Attention-based motion perception.

Authors:  P Cavanagh
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-09-11       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  A specific deficit of dorsal stream function in Williams' syndrome.

Authors:  J Atkinson; J King; O Braddick; L Nokes; S Anker; F Braddick
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1997-05-27       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  Abnormal dendritic spines in fragile X knockout mice: maturation and pruning deficits.

Authors:  T A Comery; J B Harris; P J Willems; B A Oostra; S A Irwin; I J Weiler; W T Greenough
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-05-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Spatiotemporal properties of motion perception for random-check contrast modulations.

Authors:  S Nishida
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Motion aftereffect with flickering test patterns reveals higher stages of motion processing.

Authors:  S Nishida; T Sato
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Evidence for separate motion-detecting mechanisms for first- and second-order motion in human vision.

Authors:  T Ledgeway; A T Smith
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Facial emotion identification in males with fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  E W Simon; B M Finucane
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1996-02-16

9.  Impairment of the perception of second order motion but not first order motion in a patient with unilateral focal brain damage.

Authors:  L M Vaina; A Cowey
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1996-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Motion defined exclusively by second-order characteristics does not evoke optokinetic nystagmus.

Authors:  L R Harris; A T Smith
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.241

View more
  29 in total

1.  Resolution of spatial and temporal visual attention in infants with fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Faraz Farzin; Susan M Rivera; David Whitney
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Associating neural alterations and genotype in autism and fragile x syndrome: incorporating perceptual phenotypes in causal modeling.

Authors:  Armando Bertone; Julie Hanck; Cary Kogan; Avi Chaudhuri; Kim Cornish
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2010-12

3.  A 'learning platform' approach to outcome measurement in fragile X syndrome: a preliminary psychometric study.

Authors:  S S Hall; J L Hammond; M Hirt; A L Reiss
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  2012-04-25

4.  Time crawls: the temporal resolution of infants' visual attention.

Authors:  Faraz Farzin; Susan M Rivera; David Whitney
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-06-28

5.  Visual attention and autistic behavior in infants with fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Jane E Roberts; Deborah D Hatton; Anna C J Long; Vittoria Anello; John Colombo
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2012-06

Review 6.  Comprehensive neurocognitive endophenotyping strategies for mouse models of genetic disorders.

Authors:  Michael R Hunsaker
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 11.685

7.  Neural cell adhesion molecule NrCAM regulates Semaphorin 3F-induced dendritic spine remodeling.

Authors:  Galina P Demyanenko; Vishwa Mohan; Xuying Zhang; Leann H Brennaman; Katherine E S Dharbal; Tracy S Tran; Paul B Manis; Patricia F Maness
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Low-Dose Sertraline in Young Children With Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Laura Greiss Hess; Sarah E Fitzpatrick; Danh V Nguyen; Yanjun Chen; Kimberly N Gaul; Andrea Schneider; Kerrie Lemons Chitwood; Marwa Abd Al Azaim Eldeeb; Jonathan Polussa; David Hessl; Susan Rivera; Randi J Hagerman
Journal:  J Dev Behav Pediatr       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.225

Review 9.  Fragile X: a family of disorders.

Authors:  Weerasak Chonchaiya; Andrea Schneider; Randi J Hagerman
Journal:  Adv Pediatr       Date:  2009

10.  Dynamic Object Representations in Infants with and without Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Faraz Farzin; Susan M Rivera
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.