Literature DB >> 16811408

Density and delay of punishment of free-operant avoidance.

A Baron, A Kaufman, D Fazzini.   

Abstract

In two experiments, the free-operant shock-avoidance behavior of rats was punished by electric shock. Two aspects of the schedule of response-produced shock were varied: the frequency of punishment over time (punishment density) and the temporal interval between the punished response and the punishment (punishment delay). The general finding was that response-produced shock suppressed avoidance responding under most of the density-delay combinations studied, and suppression increased as a function of increases in density and decreases in delay. Rate increases of small magnitude also were observed, usually as an initial reaction to the lesser densities and longer delays. Response suppression, while decreasing the number of punishment shocks received, also increased the number of avoidance shocks, so that the total number of shocks received usually was greater than the minimal number possible. The results were discussed from the standpoint of similarities between the effects of punishing positively and negatively reinforced behavior. The finding that subjects did not minimize the total number of shocks suggested that when avoidance behavior is punished, responding is controlled more by the local consequences of responding than by overall shock frequencies during the course of the session.

Entities:  

Year:  1969        PMID: 16811408      PMCID: PMC1338715          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-1029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  10 in total

1.  DELAYED PUNISHMENT OF A RUNWAY RESPONSE.

Authors:  A BARON
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1965-08

2.  The delay-of-punishment gradient.

Authors:  L J KAMIN
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1959-08

3.  Two temporal parameters of the maintenance of avoidance behavior by the white rat.

Authors:  M SIDMAN
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1953-08

4.  Fixed-interval punishment.

Authors:  J B Appel
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Schedules using noxious stimuli. III. Responding maintained with response-produced electric shocks.

Authors:  R T Kelleher; W H Morse
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Responding in the cat maintained under response-independent electric shock and response-produced electric shock.

Authors:  L D Byrd
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Continuous punishment of free-operant avoidance in the rat.

Authors:  R W Powell; G Morris
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Maintenance of responding under a fixed-interval schedule of electric shock-presentation.

Authors:  J W McKearney
Journal:  Science       Date:  1968-06-14       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Sidman avoidance performance under punishment and non-contingent shock conditions.

Authors:  R W McIntire; H Davis; S I Cohen; E O Franch
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1968-06

10.  Temporal relationship between response and punishment.

Authors:  D S Camp; G A Raymond; R M Church
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1967-05
  10 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Stimuli inevitably generated by behavior that avoids electric shock are inherently reinforcing.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 2.  On the status of knowledge for using punishment implications for treating behavior disorders.

Authors:  Dorothea C Lerman; Christina M Vorndran
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2002

3.  An approach to identifying the conditions under which response interruption will reduce automatically reinforced problem behavior.

Authors:  Megan L Kliebert; Jeffrey H Tiger; Karen A Toussaint
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2011

4.  The effects of delayed reinforcement on free-operant responding.

Authors:  J L Weil
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Negative reinforcement without shock reduction.

Authors:  P N Hineline
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Effects of response-shock interval and shock intensity on free-operant avoidance responding in the pigeon.

Authors:  M Klein; M Rilling
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 2.468

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.