| Literature DB >> 22530944 |
Hajeong Lee1, Yun Jung Oh, Myounghee Kim, Ho Kim, Jung Pyo Lee, Sejoong Kim, Kook-Hwan Oh, Ho Jun Chin, Kwon Wook Joo, Chun Soo Lim, Suhnggwon Kim, Yon Su Kim, Dong Ki Kim.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Only a few large-scale studies have investigated the association between health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and renal function. Moreover, the HRQOL of patients with moderate renal dysfunction is frequently underestimated by healthcare providers. This study assessed the impact of renal function on preference-based HRQOL in Korean adult population.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22530944 PMCID: PMC3404912 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2369-13-19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Nephrol ISSN: 1471-2369 Impact factor: 2.388
Demographic characteristics of participants by eGFR
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | ≥ 90.0 | 60.0-89.9 | 30.0-59.9 | ||
| Age | 46.5 ± 15.7 | 32.3 ± 12.1 | 46.5 ± 14.0 | 67.7 ± 9.9 | < 0.001 |
| Male | 2,379 (100) | 456 (19.2) | 1,835 (77.1) | 88 (3.7) | |
| Female | 3,176 (100) | 260 (8.2) | 2,518 (79.3) | 398 (12.5) | |
| eGFR | 76.4 ± 12.2 | 96.7 ± 5.6 | 75.3 ± 8.2 | 55.9 ± 5.5 | < 0.001 |
| Proteinuria (%) | 0.141 | ||||
| Negative | 94.4 | 93.3 | 94.9 | 91.6 | |
| Mild | 4.8 | 5.9 | 4.5 | 6.1 | |
| Heavy | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 2.3 | |
| Co-morbidities (%) | |||||
| Diabetes mellitus | 7.6 | 3.7 | 7.0 | 19.0 | < 0.001 |
| Hypertension | 25.3 | 11.0 | 24.1 | 55.3 | < 0.001 |
| Metabolic syndrome | 29.4 | 13.8 | 28.4 | 60.0 | < 0.001 |
| Anemia | 11.2 | 9.5 | 11.0 | 16.0 | 0.001 |
| Ischemic heart disease | 2.2 | 0.4 | 2.0 | 6.0 | < 0.001 |
| Cerebrovascular disease | 2.2 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 8.2 | < 0.001 |
Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation or a percentage. eGFR calculated using the modified MDRD formula [21]. Ischemic heart disease included angina pectoris and myocardial infarction. eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; MDRD, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease.
Socioeconomic status, psychological factors, and health-related behavioral patterns of participants stratified to eGFR
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | ≥ 90.0 | 60.0-89.9 | 30.0-59.9 | ||
| Marital status: living without a spouse (%) | 28.5 | 48.6 | 23.2 | 46.8 | 0.001 |
| Occupation (%) | < 0.001 | ||||
| White collar | 31.9 | 34.2 | 34.0 | 9.5 | |
| Blue collar | 26.6 | 26.1 | 27.1 | 22.1 | |
| Student/soldier/housewife | 25.9 | 30.2 | 25.2 | 26.1 | |
| No occupation | 15.6 | 9.5 | 13.6 | 42.0 | |
| Education (%) | < 0.001 | ||||
| University or higher | 25.3 | 33.1 | 26.2 | 4.9 | |
| Upper secondary level | 49.9 | 58.8 | 51.6 | 21.4 | |
| Compulsory education | 24.9 | 8.1 | 22.2 | 73.8 | |
| Income (US $) | 2,090.9 ± 1,489.0 | 2,221.5 ± 1,326.5 | 2,166.5 ± 1,509.5 | 1,298.9 ± 1280.8 | < 0.001 |
| Rural residence (%) | 22.7 | 19.0 | 21.9 | 35.4 | < 0.001 |
| Some or extreme degree of stress (%) | 33.9 | 33.4 | 33.8 | 33.6 | 0.778 |
| Sleep quality: insufficient sleep (%) | 35.6 | 41.1 | 35.5 | 29.0 | < 0.001 |
| Physical activity: ≤ 3 times per week (%) | 13.4 | 16.2 | 13.5 | 5.8 | 0.145 |
| Smoking: life-time smoker (%) | 37.9 | 46.2 | 37.9 | 26.0 | < 0.001 |
| Alcohol intake: ≥ once a month (%) | 31.2 | 39.5 | 32.1 | 11.6 | < 0.001 |
Data expressed a as a percentage or the mean ± standard deviation. eGFR was calculated using the modified MDRD formula [21]. Upper secondary level of education included middle and high school graduate. Compulsory education meant elementary school graduate or less. eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; MDRD, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease.
Figure 1Proportion of participants who reported problems in each of the five EQ-5D dimensions.
Figure 2Mean values of the EQ-5D utility score in a Korean adult population without adjustment (A) and adjusted for age (B). Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean.
Figure 3EQ-5D utility scores for chronic diseases in Korea [24]. The black bar indicates patients with eGFR 30.0-59.9 mL/min/1.73 m2 who were investigated in this study.
Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses for impaired HRQOL
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | ||||
| Age (year) | < 40 | Reference | Reference | ||
| 40-60 | 2.205 (1.910-2.545) | < 0.001 | 1.598 (1.345-1.879) | < 0.001 | |
| ≥ 60 | 9.573 (8.117-11.289) | < 0.001 | 3.337 (2.598-4.287) | < 0.001 | |
| Male | Male | 0.569 (0.508-0.638) | < 0.001 | 0.569 (0.487-0.666) | < 0.001 |
| eGFR | ≥ 90.0 | Reference | Reference | ||
| 60.0-89.9 | 1.994 (1.639-2.426) | < 0.001 | 1.168 (0.929-1.469) | 0.185 | |
| 30.0-59.9 | 10.372 (7.868-13.672) | < 0.001 | 1.531 (1.077-2.176) | 0.018 | |
| Diabetes mellitus | Yes | 2.140 (1.747-2.622) | < 0.001 | ||
| Hypertension | Yes | 2.554 (2.252-2.895) | < 0.001 | 1.231 (1.048-1.445) | 0.011 |
| Metabolic syndrome | Yes | 2.091 (1.853-2.358) | < 0.001 | ||
| Ischemic heart disease | Yes | 8.419 (5.184-13.675) | < 0.001 | 3.730 (2.169-6.415) | < 0.001 |
| Cerebrovascular accident | yes | 3.349 (3.505-8.164) | < 0.001 | 1.971 (1.194-3.256) | 0.008 |
| Alcohol intake | ≥ 1/week | 0.652 (0.576-0.737) | < 0.001 | ||
| Smoking status | life-time smoker | 0.789 (0.703-0.886) | < 0.001 | ||
| Marital status | without spouse | 1.290 (1.141-1.458) | < 0.001 | ||
| Occupation | white collar | Reference | Reference | ||
| blue collar | 2.545 (2.184-2.965) | < 0.001 | 1.400 (1.154-1.689) | 0.001 | |
| other† | 1.944 (1.661-2.275 | < 0.001 | 1.328 (1.097-1.608) | 0.004 | |
| no occupation | 4.953 (4.148-5.914) | < 0.001 | 1.741 (1.378-2.199) | < 0.001 | |
| Education | ≥ university | Reference | Reference | ||
| upper 2ndary‡ | 1.886 (1.608-2.213) | < 0.001 | 1.294 (1.076-1.555) | 0.006 | |
| ≤ compulsory§ | 9.607 (8.035-11.488) | <0.001 | 2.515 (1.970-3.212) | < 0.001 | |
| Income | highest quartile | Reference | Reference | ||
| 2nd -3rd quartile | 1.432 (1.224-1.674) | < 0.001 | 1.139 (0.953-1.360) | 0.152 | |
| lowest quartile | 4.735 (3.986-5.625) | < 0.001 | 1.676 (1.356-2.072) | < 0.001 | |
| Residence | rural residence | 2.056 (1.808-2.339) | < 0.001 | 1.190 (1.011-1.401) | 0.036 |
| Stress | some or extreme | 1.752 (1.559-1.968) | < 0.001 | 1.753 (1.525-2.016) | < 0.001 |
| Sleep quality | insufficient | 1.276 (1.137-1.432) | < 0.001 | 1.606 (1.396-1.848) | < 0.001 |
Values shown are OR (95% CI). Impaired HRQOL was defined as the lowest quartile of EQ-5D weighted values. Potential risk factors in the unadjusted analysis (P < 0.05) were included in the adjusted analysis. The multivariate logistic regression analysis model was derived using the backward conditional method. †Students, soldiers and housewives; ‡middle and high school graduates; §elementary school or no education. HRQOL, health-related quality of life; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate (mL/min/1.73 m2); OR, odds ratio; CI; confidence interval
Binary multivariate logistic regression of the EQ-5D dimensions
| EQ-5D dimensions | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobility | Self-care | Usual activity | Pain/discomfort | Anxiety/depression | ||
| Age | < 40 | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
| 40-60 | 2.796 (1.196-4.354)# | 9.205 (2.148-39.441)** | 3.137 (1.986-4.955)# | 1.601 (1.347-1.903)# | 1.347 (1.118-1.623)** | |
| ≥ 60 | 7.230 (4.462-11.716)# | 13.686 (3.095-60.511)** | 5.788 (3.529-9.494)# | 3.254 (2.537-4.174)# | 1.603 (1.243-2.068)** | |
| Sex | male | 0.452 (0.354-0.578)# | - | 0.565 (0.440-0.727)** | 0.543 (0.464-0.635)# | 0.461 (0.364-0.584)# |
| eGFR | ≥ 90.0 | Reference | -- | -- | Reference | -- |
| 60.0-89.9 | 1.863 (1.053-3.296)* | 1.240 (0.982-1.565) | ||||
| 30.0-59.9 | 2.192 (1.178-4.077)* | 1.574 (1.113-2.225)* | ||||
| Diabetes mellitus | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | |
| Hypertension | 1.412 (1.419-1.735)* | -- | -- | 1.225 (1.045-1.435)* | -- | |
| Metabolic syndrome | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | |
| Ischemic heart disease | 2.403 (1.523-3.791)# | -- | 1.968 (1.245-3.110)** | 2.515 (1.558-4.058)# | 1.987 (1.316-2.999)** | |
| Cerebrovascular disease | 3.056 (1.886-4.953)# | 5.326 (3.091-9.179)# | 3.018 (1.907-4.777)# | 1.578 (0.987-2.524) | 1.833 (1.188-2.827)** | |
| Anemia | -- | -- | 1.385 (1.029-1.864) * | - | - | |
| Alcohol intake | -- | 0.518 (0.306-0.877)* | -- | -- | -- | |
| Smoking | -- | - | - | -- | 1.329 (1.060-1.667)* | |
| Physical inactivity | 1.246 (0.978-1.589) | 1.978 (1.098-3.564)* | 1.435 (1.098-1.875)** | - | 1.158 (0.978-1.372) | |
| Marital status | without spouse | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Occupation | white collar | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
| blue collar | 1.401 (0.987-1.988) | 0.935 (0.436-2.005) | 1.336 (0.920-1.939) | 1.540 (1.272-1.863)# | 1.194 (0.960-1.486) | |
| other† | 1.403 (0.985-1.998) | 1.318 (0.619-2.808) | 1.355 (0.926-1.983) | 1.342 (1.108-1.625)** | 1.213 (0.981-1.499) | |
| no occupation | 2.293 (1.600-3.287)# | 2.369 (1.146-4.898)* | 2.148 (1.464-3.149)# | 1.637 (1.298-2.065)# | 1.581 (1.234-2.026)** | |
| Education | ≥ university | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
| upper 2ndary‡ | 1.976 (1.226-3.187)** | 1.830 (0.618-5.423) | 1.680 (1.026-2.751)* | 1.235 (1.027-1.486)* | 1.276 (1.032-1.578)* | |
| ≤ compulsory§ | 4.347 (2.631-7.181)# | 3.468 (1.154-10.421)* | 3.221 (1.907-5.440)# | 2.306 (1.810-2.938)# | 1.697 (1.286-2.240)# | |
| Income | highest quartile | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
| 2nd -3rd quartile | 1.215 (0.857-1.722) | 1.534 (0.662-3.554) | 1.563 (1.048-2.332)* | 1.121 (0.938-1.339) | 1.209 (0.983-1.488) | |
| lowest quartile | 1.941 (1.367-2.758)# | 3.005 (1.324-6.825)** | 2.442 (1.632-3.654)# | 1.590 (1.288-1.963)# | 1.879 (1.483-2.381)# | |
| Residence | rural | 1.383 (1.107-1.727)** | -- | 1.581 (1.255-1.992)# | - | 0.854 (0.714-1.021) |
| Stress | some/extreme | 1.455 (1.186-1.785)# | - | 1.496 (1.208-1.852)# | 1.739 (1.514-1.997)# | 3.041 (2.633-3.513)# |
| Sleep quality | insufficient | - | - | - | 1.613 (1.403-1.854)# | - |
Values shown are OR (95% CI). Cells with a dash indicate that the variable was not included in the model. Cells with two dashes indicate that the variable was included in the multivariate model but excluded after the multivariate analysis. The multivariate logistic regression analysis model was derived using the backward conditional method. † Students, soldiers and housewives; ‡ middle and high school graduates; § elementary school or no education; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.001; #P < 0.001. eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate (mL/min/1.73 m2); OR, odd ratio; CI, confidence interval