Literature DB >> 11412884

Contextual influences on orientation discrimination: binding local and global cues.

I Mareschal1, M P Sceniak, R M Shapley.   

Abstract

We sought to determine how local and global features within an image interact by examining whether orientation discrimination thresholds could be modified by contextual information. In particular, we investigated how local orientation signals within an image are pooled together, and whether this pooling process is dependent on the global orientation content present in the image. We find that observers' orientation judgments depend on surround contextual information, with performance being optimal when the center and surround stimuli are clearly distinct. In cases where the center and surround were not clearly segregated, we report two sets of results. If there was an ambiguity regarding the perception of a global structure (i.e. a small mismatch between local cues), observers' performance was impaired. If there was no mismatch and local and global cues were consistent with the perception of a single surface, observers performed as well as in the distinct surfaces case. Although some of our results can be largely accounted for by interactions between differently oriented filters, other aspects are more difficult to reconcile with this explanation. We suggest that low level filtering constrains observers' performance, and that influences arising from image segmentation modify how local orientation signals are pooled together.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11412884     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00082-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  8 in total

1.  Dynamics of unconscious contextual effects in orientation processing.

Authors:  Isabelle Mareschal; Colin W G Clifford
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Contextual effects in fine spatial discriminations.

Authors:  Lynn A Olzak; Pentti I Laurinen
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  Contextual effects on fine orientation discrimination tasks.

Authors:  Stephanie A Saylor; Lynn A Olzak
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Segmentation decreases the magnitude of the tilt illusion.

Authors:  Cheng Qiu; Daniel Kersten; Cheryl A Olman
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Peeling plaids apart: context counteracts cross-orientation contrast masking.

Authors:  Elliot Freeman; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Stochastic re-calibration: contextual effects on perceived tilt.

Authors:  Joshua A Solomon; Michael J Morgan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Flexible contextual modulation of naturalistic texture perception in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Daniel Herrera-Esposito; Ruben Coen-Cagli; Leonel Gomez-Sena
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  The equivalent internal orientation and position noise for contour integration.

Authors:  Alex S Baldwin; Minnie Fu; Reza Farivar; Robert F Hess
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.