S L Liu1, P O'Brien1, Y Zhao2, W M Hopman3, N Lamond1, R Ramjeesingh1. 1. Division of Medical Oncology, qeii Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, qeii Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS. 3. Kingston General Hospital Research Institute and Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON.
Abstract
Background: Little is known about the benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy (adj) in the older population with locally advanced rectal cancer (larc). We evaluated use of adj, survival outcomes, and adj-related toxicity in older patients with larc. Methods: Our retrospective review included 286 patients with larc (stages ii and iii) diagnosed between January 2010 and December 2013 in Nova Scotia who underwent curative-intent surgery. Baseline patient, tumour, and treatment characteristics were collected. The survival analysis used the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression statistics. Results: Of 286 identified patients, 152 were 65 years of age or older, and 92 were 70 years of age or older. Median follow-up was 46 months, and 163 patients (57%) received neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Although adj was given to 81% of patients (n = 109) less than 65 years of age, only 29% patients (n = 27) 70 years of age and older received adj. Kaplan-Meier analysis suggested a potential survival advantage for adj regardless of age. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, T stage, and adj were significant predictors of overall survival (p < 0.04); age was not. Similarly, N stage, neoadjuvant chemoradiation, and adj were significant predictors of disease-free survival (p < 0.01). Poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was the most common cause of adj omission. In patients 70 years of age and older, grade 1 or greater chemotherapy-related toxicities were experienced significantly more often by those treated with adj (85% vs. 68% for those not treated with adj, p < 0.05). Conclusions: Regardless of age, patients with larc seem to experience a survival benefit with adj. However, older patients are less likely to receive adj, and when they do, they experience more chemotherapy-related toxicities.
Background: Little is known about the benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy (adj) in the older population with locally advanced rectal cancer (larc). We evaluated use of adj, survival outcomes, and adj-related toxicity in older patients with larc. Methods: Our retrospective review included 286 patients with larc (stages ii and iii) diagnosed between January 2010 and December 2013 in Nova Scotia who underwent curative-intent surgery. Baseline patient, tumour, and treatment characteristics were collected. The survival analysis used the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression statistics. Results: Of 286 identified patients, 152 were 65 years of age or older, and 92 were 70 years of age or older. Median follow-up was 46 months, and 163 patients (57%) received neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Although adj was given to 81% of patients (n = 109) less than 65 years of age, only 29% patients (n = 27) 70 years of age and older received adj. Kaplan-Meier analysis suggested a potential survival advantage for adj regardless of age. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, T stage, and adj were significant predictors of overall survival (p < 0.04); age was not. Similarly, N stage, neoadjuvant chemoradiation, and adj were significant predictors of disease-free survival (p < 0.01). Poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was the most common cause of adj omission. In patients 70 years of age and older, grade 1 or greater chemotherapy-related toxicities were experienced significantly more often by those treated with adj (85% vs. 68% for those not treated with adj, p < 0.05). Conclusions: Regardless of age, patients with larc seem to experience a survival benefit with adj. However, older patients are less likely to receive adj, and when they do, they experience more chemotherapy-related toxicities.
Authors: Rebecca Y Tay; Murtaza Jamnagerwalla; Malcolm Steel; Hui-Li Wong; Joseph J McKendrick; Ian Faragher; Suzanne Kosmider; Ian Hastie; Jayesh Desai; Mark Tacey; Peter Gibbs; Rachel Wong Journal: Clin Colorectal Cancer Date: 2016-10-06 Impact factor: 4.481
Authors: F N van Erning; H J T Rutten; H A van den Berg; V E P P Lemmens; H K van Halteren Journal: Eur J Surg Oncol Date: 2015-09-26 Impact factor: 4.424
Authors: A De Paoli; S Chiara; G Luppi; M L Friso; G D Beretta; S Del Prete; L Pasetto; M Santantonio; E Sarti; G Mantello; R Innocente; S Frustaci; R Corvò; R Rosso Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2005-11-09 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Valentine Guimas; Jihane Boustani; Benjamin Schipman; Nicolas Lescut; Marc Puyraveau; Jean François Bosset; Stéphanie Servagi-Vernat Journal: Drugs Aging Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 3.923
Authors: C A Thiels; J R Bergquist; A J Meyers; C L Johnson; K T Behm; A V Hayman; E B Habermann; D W Larson; K L Mathis Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2015-12-10 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: Sharon A Dobie; Joan L Warren; Barbara Matthews; David Schwartz; Laura-Mae Baldwin; Kevin Billingsley Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-02-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Mauro Podda; Patricia Sylla; Gianluca Baiocchi; Michel Adamina; Vanni Agnoletti; Ferdinando Agresta; Luca Ansaloni; Alberto Arezzo; Nicola Avenia; Walter Biffl; Antonio Biondi; Simona Bui; Fabio C Campanile; Paolo Carcoforo; Claudia Commisso; Antonio Crucitti; Nicola De'Angelis; Gian Luigi De'Angelis; Massimo De Filippo; Belinda De Simone; Salomone Di Saverio; Giorgio Ercolani; Gustavo P Fraga; Francesco Gabrielli; Federica Gaiani; Mario Guerrieri; Angelo Guttadauro; Yoram Kluger; Ari K Leppaniemi; Andrea Loffredo; Tiziana Meschi; Ernest E Moore; Monica Ortenzi; Francesco Pata; Dario Parini; Adolfo Pisanu; Gilberto Poggioli; Andrea Polistena; Alessandro Puzziello; Fabio Rondelli; Massimo Sartelli; Neil Smart; Michael E Sugrue; Patricia Tejedor; Marco Vacante; Federico Coccolini; Justin Davies; Fausto Catena Journal: World J Emerg Surg Date: 2021-07-02 Impact factor: 5.469