OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the relationship between the 2 hallmark proteins of Alzheimer disease (AD), amyloid-(Aβ) and tau, and clinical decline over time among cognitively normal older individuals. DESIGN: A longitudinal cohort of clinically and cognitively normal older individuals assessed with baseline lumbar puncture and longitudinal clinical assessments. SETTING: Research centers across the United States and Canada. PATIENTS: We examined 107 participants with a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) of 0 at baseline examination. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Using linear mixed effects models, we investigated the relationship between cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) phospho-tau 181 (p-tau(181p)),CSF Aβ(1-42), and clinical decline as assessed using longitudinal change in global CDR, CDR-Sum of Boxes, and the Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale. RESULTS: We found a significant relationship between decreased CSF Aβ(1-42) and longitudinal change in global CDR,CDR-Sum of Boxes, and Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale in individuals with elevated CSFp-tau(181p). In the absence of CSF p-tau(181p), the effect of CSF Aβ(1-42) on longitudinal clinical decline was not significantly different from 0. CONCLUSIONS: In cognitively normal older individuals,A-associated clinical decline during a mean of 3 years may occur only in the presence of ongoing downstream neurodegeneration.
OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the relationship between the 2 hallmark proteins of Alzheimer disease (AD), amyloid-(Aβ) and tau, and clinical decline over time among cognitively normal older individuals. DESIGN: A longitudinal cohort of clinically and cognitively normal older individuals assessed with baseline lumbar puncture and longitudinal clinical assessments. SETTING: Research centers across the United States and Canada. PATIENTS: We examined 107 participants with a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) of 0 at baseline examination. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Using linear mixed effects models, we investigated the relationship between cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) phospho-tau 181 (p-tau(181p)),CSF Aβ(1-42), and clinical decline as assessed using longitudinal change in global CDR, CDR-Sum of Boxes, and the Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale. RESULTS: We found a significant relationship between decreased CSF Aβ(1-42) and longitudinal change in global CDR,CDR-Sum of Boxes, and Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale in individuals with elevated CSFp-tau(181p). In the absence of CSF p-tau(181p), the effect of CSF Aβ(1-42) on longitudinal clinical decline was not significantly different from 0. CONCLUSIONS: In cognitively normal older individuals,A-associated clinical decline during a mean of 3 years may occur only in the presence of ongoing downstream neurodegeneration.
Authors: Reisa A Sperling; Paul S Aisen; Laurel A Beckett; David A Bennett; Suzanne Craft; Anne M Fagan; Takeshi Iwatsubo; Clifford R Jack; Jeffrey Kaye; Thomas J Montine; Denise C Park; Eric M Reiman; Christopher C Rowe; Eric Siemers; Yaakov Stern; Kristine Yaffe; Maria C Carrillo; Bill Thies; Marcelle Morrison-Bogorad; Molly V Wagster; Creighton H Phelps Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2011-04-21 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Rebecca Craig-Schapiro; Richard J Perrin; Catherine M Roe; Chengjie Xiong; Deborah Carter; Nigel J Cairns; Mark A Mintun; Elaine R Peskind; Ge Li; Douglas R Galasko; Christopher M Clark; Joseph F Quinn; Gina D'Angelo; James P Malone; R Reid Townsend; John C Morris; Anne M Fagan; David M Holtzman Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2010-11-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Rawan Tarawneh; Gina D'Angelo; Elizabeth Macy; Chengjie Xiong; Deborah Carter; Nigel J Cairns; Anne M Fagan; Denise Head; Mark A Mintun; Jack H Ladenson; Jin-Moo Lee; John C Morris; David M Holtzman Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Lars M Ittner; Yazi D Ke; Fabien Delerue; Mian Bi; Amadeus Gladbach; Janet van Eersel; Heidrun Wölfing; Billy C Chieng; MacDonald J Christie; Ian A Napier; Anne Eckert; Matthias Staufenbiel; Edna Hardeman; Jürgen Götz Journal: Cell Date: 2010-07-22 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: John C Morris; Catherine M Roe; Elizabeth A Grant; Denise Head; Martha Storandt; Alison M Goate; Anne M Fagan; David M Holtzman; Mark A Mintun Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2009-12
Authors: Harald Hampel; Kaj Blennow; Leslie M Shaw; Yvonne C Hoessler; Henrik Zetterberg; John Q Trojanowski Journal: Exp Gerontol Date: 2009-10-22 Impact factor: 4.032
Authors: Andrew J Aschenbrenner; David A Balota; Anne M Fagan; Janet M Duchek; Tammie L S Benzinger; John C Morris Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Jennifer S Rabin; Aaron P Schultz; Trey Hedden; Anand Viswanathan; Gad A Marshall; Emily Kilpatrick; Hannah Klein; Rachel F Buckley; Hyun-Sik Yang; Michael Properzi; Vaishnavi Rao; Dylan R Kirn; Kathryn V Papp; Dorene M Rentz; Keith A Johnson; Reisa A Sperling; Jasmeer P Chhatwal Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: David S Knopman; Clifford R Jack; Heather J Wiste; Stephen D Weigand; Prashanthi Vemuri; Val J Lowe; Kejal Kantarci; Jeffrey L Gunter; Matthew L Senjem; Michelle M Mielke; Rosebud O Roberts; Bradley F Boeve; Ronald C Petersen Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2013-02-19 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Miranka Wirth; Cindee M Madison; Gil D Rabinovici; Hwamee Oh; Susan M Landau; William J Jagust Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2013-03-27 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Anders M Fjell; Linda McEvoy; Dominic Holland; Anders M Dale; Kristine B Walhovd Journal: Prog Neurobiol Date: 2014-02-16 Impact factor: 11.685