Jennifer S Rabin1, Aaron P Schultz2,3, Trey Hedden3, Anand Viswanathan2,4, Gad A Marshall2,5, Emily Kilpatrick2, Hannah Klein2, Rachel F Buckley2,6,7, Hyun-Sik Yang2,5, Michael Properzi2, Vaishnavi Rao2, Dylan R Kirn2, Kathryn V Papp2,5, Dorene M Rentz2,5, Keith A Johnson2,3,5,8, Reisa A Sperling2,3,5, Jasmeer P Chhatwal2. 1. Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston. 2. Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston. 3. Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston. 4. J. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston. 5. Center for Alzheimer Research and Treatment, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 6. Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. 7. Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. 8. Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Abstract
Importance: Identifying asymptomatic individuals at high risk of impending cognitive decline because of Alzheimer disease is crucial for successful prevention of dementia. Vascular risk and β-amyloid (Aβ) pathology commonly co-occur in older adults and are significant causes of cognitive impairment. Objective: To determine whether vascular risk and Aβ burden act additively or synergistically to promote cognitive decline in clinically normal older adults; and, secondarily, to evaluate the unique influence of vascular risk on prospective cognitive decline beyond that of commonly used imaging biomarkers, including Aβ burden, hippocampal volume, fludeoxyglucose F18-labeled (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET), and white matter hyperintensities, a marker of cerebrovascular disease. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this longitudinal observational study, we examined clinically normal older adults from the Harvard Aging Brain Study. Participants were required to have baseline imaging data (FDG-PET, Aβ-PET, and magnetic resonance imaging), baseline medical data to quantify vascular risk, and at least 1 follow-up neuropsychological visit. Data collection began in 2010 and is ongoing. Data analysis was performed on data collected between 2010 and 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: Vascular risk was quantified using the Framingham Heart Study general cardiovascular disease (FHS-CVD) risk score. We measured Aβ burden with Pittsburgh Compound-B PET. Cognition was measured annually with the Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite. Models were corrected for baseline age, sex, years of education, and apolipoprotein E ε4 status. Results: Of the 223 participants, 130 (58.3%) were women. The mean (SD) age was 73.7 (6.0) years, and the mean (SD) follow-up time was 3.7 (1.2) years. Faster cognitive decline was associated with both a higher FHS-CVD risk score (β = -0.064; 95% CI, -0.094 to -0.033; P < .001) and higher Aβ burden (β = -0.058; 95% CI, -0.079 to -0.037; P < .001). The interaction of the FHS-CVD risk score and Aβ burden with time was significant (β = -0.040, 95% CI, -0.062 to -0.018; P < .001), suggesting a synergistic effect. The FHS-CVD risk score remained robustly associated with prospective cognitive decline (β = -0.055; 95% CI, -0.086 to -0.024; P < .001), even after adjustment for Aβ burden, hippocampal volume, FDG-PET uptake, and white matter hyperintensities. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, vascular risk was associated with prospective cognitive decline in clinically normal older adults, both alone and synergistically with Aβ burden. Vascular risk may complement imaging biomarkers in assessing risk of prospective cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer disease.
Importance: Identifying asymptomatic individuals at high risk of impending cognitive decline because of Alzheimer disease is crucial for successful prevention of dementia. Vascular risk and β-amyloid (Aβ) pathology commonly co-occur in older adults and are significant causes of cognitive impairment. Objective: To determine whether vascular risk and Aβ burden act additively or synergistically to promote cognitive decline in clinically normal older adults; and, secondarily, to evaluate the unique influence of vascular risk on prospective cognitive decline beyond that of commonly used imaging biomarkers, including Aβ burden, hippocampal volume, fludeoxyglucose F18-labeled (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET), and white matter hyperintensities, a marker of cerebrovascular disease. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this longitudinal observational study, we examined clinically normal older adults from the Harvard Aging Brain Study. Participants were required to have baseline imaging data (FDG-PET, Aβ-PET, and magnetic resonance imaging), baseline medical data to quantify vascular risk, and at least 1 follow-up neuropsychological visit. Data collection began in 2010 and is ongoing. Data analysis was performed on data collected between 2010 and 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: Vascular risk was quantified using the Framingham Heart Study general cardiovascular disease (FHS-CVD) risk score. We measured Aβ burden with Pittsburgh Compound-B PET. Cognition was measured annually with the Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite. Models were corrected for baseline age, sex, years of education, and apolipoprotein E ε4 status. Results: Of the 223 participants, 130 (58.3%) were women. The mean (SD) age was 73.7 (6.0) years, and the mean (SD) follow-up time was 3.7 (1.2) years. Faster cognitive decline was associated with both a higher FHS-CVD risk score (β = -0.064; 95% CI, -0.094 to -0.033; P < .001) and higher Aβ burden (β = -0.058; 95% CI, -0.079 to -0.037; P < .001). The interaction of the FHS-CVD risk score and Aβ burden with time was significant (β = -0.040, 95% CI, -0.062 to -0.018; P < .001), suggesting a synergistic effect. The FHS-CVD risk score remained robustly associated with prospective cognitive decline (β = -0.055; 95% CI, -0.086 to -0.024; P < .001), even after adjustment for Aβ burden, hippocampal volume, FDG-PET uptake, and white matter hyperintensities. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, vascular risk was associated with prospective cognitive decline in clinically normal older adults, both alone and synergistically with Aβ burden. Vascular risk may complement imaging biomarkers in assessing risk of prospective cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer disease.
Authors: Bruce Fischl; David H Salat; Evelina Busa; Marilyn Albert; Megan Dieterich; Christian Haselgrove; Andre van der Kouwe; Ron Killiany; David Kennedy; Shuna Klaveness; Albert Montillo; Nikos Makris; Bruce Rosen; Anders M Dale Journal: Neuron Date: 2002-01-31 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Setsu Wakana; Hangyi Jiang; Lidia M Nagae-Poetscher; Peter C M van Zijl; Susumu Mori Journal: Radiology Date: 2003-11-26 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Saeid Taheri; Charles Gasparovic; Branko N Huisa; John C Adair; Elaine Edmonds; Jillian Prestopnik; Mark Grossetete; N Jon Shah; John Wills; Clifford Qualls; Gary A Rosenberg Journal: Stroke Date: 2011-06-30 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Bruno Dubois; Harald Hampel; Howard H Feldman; Philip Scheltens; Paul Aisen; Sandrine Andrieu; Hovagim Bakardjian; Habib Benali; Lars Bertram; Kaj Blennow; Karl Broich; Enrica Cavedo; Sebastian Crutch; Jean-François Dartigues; Charles Duyckaerts; Stéphane Epelbaum; Giovanni B Frisoni; Serge Gauthier; Remy Genthon; Alida A Gouw; Marie-Odile Habert; David M Holtzman; Miia Kivipelto; Simone Lista; José-Luis Molinuevo; Sid E O'Bryant; Gil D Rabinovici; Christopher Rowe; Stephen Salloway; Lon S Schneider; Reisa Sperling; Marc Teichmann; Maria C Carrillo; Jeffrey Cummings; Cliff R Jack Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Timo Grimmer; Maximilian Faust; Florian Auer; Panagiotis Alexopoulos; Hans Förstl; Gjermund Henriksen; Robert Perneczky; Christian Sorg; Behrooz H Yousefi; Alexander Drzezga; Alexander Kurz Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2012-03-10 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Rahul S Desikan; Linda K McEvoy; Wesley K Thompson; Dominic Holland; James B Brewer; Paul S Aisen; Reisa A Sperling; Anders M Dale Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2012-06
Authors: Prashanthi Vemuri; Timothy G Lesnick; Scott A Przybelski; David S Knopman; Greg M Preboske; Kejal Kantarci; Mekala R Raman; Mary M Machulda; Michelle M Mielke; Val J Lowe; Matthew L Senjem; Jeffrey L Gunter; Walter A Rocca; Rosebud O Roberts; Ronald C Petersen; Clifford R Jack Journal: Brain Date: 2015-01-15 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Omar M Al-Janabi; Christopher A Brown; Ahmed A Bahrani; Erin L Abner; Justin M Barber; Brian T Gold; Larry B Goldstein; Ronan R Murphy; Peter T Nelson; Nathan F Johnson; Leslie M Shaw; Charles D Smith; John Q Trojanowski; Donna M Wilcock; Gregory A Jicha Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2018 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Vladimir Hachinski; Karl Einhäupl; Detlev Ganten; Suvarna Alladi; Carol Brayne; Blossom C M Stephan; Melanie D Sweeney; Berislav Zlokovic; Yasser Iturria-Medina; Costantino Iadecola; Nozomi Nishimura; Chris B Schaffer; Shawn N Whitehead; Sandra E Black; Leif Østergaard; Joanna Wardlaw; Steven Greenberg; Leif Friberg; Bo Norrving; Brian Rowe; Yves Joanette; Werner Hacke; Lewis Kuller; Martin Dichgans; Matthias Endres; Zaven S Khachaturian Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Jennifer S Rabin; Hyun-Sik Yang; Aaron P Schultz; Bernard J Hanseeuw; Trey Hedden; Anand Viswanathan; Jennifer R Gatchel; Gad A Marshall; Emily Kilpatrick; Hannah Klein; Vaishnavi Rao; Rachel F Buckley; Wai-Ying Wendy Yau; Dylan R Kirn; Dorene M Rentz; Keith A Johnson; Reisa A Sperling; Jasmeer P Chhatwal Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2019-01-07 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Mario Merlini; Victoria A Rafalski; Pamela E Rios Coronado; T Michael Gill; Maya Ellisman; Gayathri Muthukumar; Keshav S Subramanian; Jae Kyu Ryu; Catriona A Syme; Dimitrios Davalos; William W Seeley; Lennart Mucke; Robert B Nelson; Katerina Akassoglou Journal: Neuron Date: 2019-02-05 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Reisa A Sperling; Michael C Donohue; Rema Raman; Chung-Kai Sun; Roy Yaari; Karen Holdridge; Eric Siemers; Keith A Johnson; Paul S Aisen Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Isabelle Bos; Stephanie J B Vos; Suzanne E Schindler; Jason Hassenstab; Chengjie Xiong; Elizabeth Grant; Frans Verhey; John C Morris; Pieter Jelle Visser; Anne M Fagan Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Kimberly D Mueller; Rebecca L Koscik; Lianlian Du; Davide Bruno; Erin M Jonaitis; Audra Z Koscik; Bradley T Christian; Tobey J Betthauser; Nathaniel A Chin; Bruce P Hermann; Sterling C Johnson Journal: Cortex Date: 2020-07-31 Impact factor: 4.027