Literature DB >> 22528612

Increased spatial salience in the social Simon task: a response-coding account of spatial compatibility effects.

Kerstin Dittrich1, Annelie Rothe, Karl Christoph Klauer.   

Abstract

A spatial compatibility effect (SCE) is typically observed in forced two-choice tasks in which a spatially defined response (e.g., pressing a left vs. a right key) has to be executed to a nonspatial feature of a stimulus (e.g., discriminating red from green) that is additionally connoted by a spatial feature (e.g., the stimulus points to the left or the right). Responses are faster and more accurate when the response side and the spatial stimulus feature are compatible than when they are incompatible. Previous research has demonstrated that SCEs are diminished when stimuli from only one response category are responded to in individual go/no-go tasks, whereas SCEs reemerge when two participants work jointly on two complementary, individual go/no-go tasks in a joint go/no-go task setting. This social Simon effect has been considered evidence for shared task representations. We show that SCEs emerge in individual go/no-go tasks when the spatial dimension is made more salient, whereas SCEs are eliminated in joint go/no-go tasks when the spatial dimension is made less salient. These findings are consistent with an account of social Simon effects in terms of spatial response coding, whereas they are inconsistent with an account of shared task representations. The relevance of social factors for spatial response coding is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22528612     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-012-0304-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  29 in total

1.  Stimulus-response correspondence in go-nogo and choice tasks: Are reactions altered by the presence of an irrelevant salient object?

Authors:  Mei-Ching Lien; Logan Pedersen; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-08-30

2.  Do you really represent my task? Sequential adaptation effects to unexpected events support referential coding for the joint Simon effect.

Authors:  Bibiana Klempova; Roman Liepelt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-04-02

3.  Dissecting the response in response-effect compatibility.

Authors:  Roland Pfister; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Increasing self-other integration through divergent thinking.

Authors:  Lorenza S Colzato; Wery P M van den Wildenberg; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-10

5.  Analyzing distributional properties of interference effects across modalities: chances and challenges.

Authors:  Kerstin Dittrich; David Kellen; Christoph Stahl
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-03-14

6.  Barriers to success: physical separation optimizes event-file retrieval in shared workspaces.

Authors:  Bibiana Klempova; Roman Liepelt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-07-08

7.  A Simon-like effect in Go/No-Go tasks performed in isolation.

Authors:  Karen Davranche; Laurence Carbonnell; Clément Belletier; Franck Vidal; Pascal Huguet; Thibault Gajdos; Thierry Hasbroucq
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-06

8.  No evidence of task co-representation in a joint Stroop task.

Authors:  Daniel R Saunders; David Melcher; Wieske van Zoest
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-08-29

9.  Joint action changes valence-based action coding in an implicit attitude task.

Authors:  Anna Stenzel; Roman Liepelt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-07-28

10.  Theory of mind and joint action in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Marco Fabbri; Carmine Vitale; Sofia Cuoco; Alessia Beracci; Rosanna Calabrese; Maria Cordella; Regina Mazzotta; Paolo Barone; Maria Teresa Pellecchia; Gabriella Santangelo
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.