Literature DB >> 30259349

Theory of mind and joint action in Parkinson's disease.

Marco Fabbri1, Carmine Vitale2,3, Sofia Cuoco4, Alessia Beracci5, Rosanna Calabrese5, Maria Cordella5, Regina Mazzotta5, Paolo Barone4, Maria Teresa Pellecchia4, Gabriella Santangelo5,3.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that the Theory of Mind (ToM) may rely on more basic processes of social cognition, such as action control (e.g., joint action), even if little is known about this relationship. The relationship between ToM and joint action can be studied in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), because they are characterized not only by a deficit in ToM (and in its cognitive and affective subcomponents) but also by a deficit in the inhibition of competing responses. Sixty PD patients and 60 matched healthy controls (HCs) performed a go/no-go Flanker task in both joint and individual conditions. Cognitive (Advanced Test or AT) and affective (Emotion Attribution Task or EAT) ToM also were measured. Thirty-five PD patients and matched HCs also performed the standard Flanker task, as a control measure. In patients, only individuals with high AT scores exhibited a joint Flanker effect, whereas in HCs the joint effect was found irrespectively of AT score. Patients with low EAT scores showed a greater interference effect than patients with high scores, whereas the opposite pattern was found for HCs. In regression analysis AT and EAT scores predicted the Flanker effect in the joint condition only. In the standard task, both groups showed a Flanker effect. The role of different fronto-striatal circuits, especially in PD patients, could explain the different involvement of cognitive and affective ToM in joint tasks. The Flanker effect is discussed considering the referential coding account and the attention-focus account as possible candidates to explain joint action effects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Flanker effect; Joint action; Parkinson’s disease; Social cognition; Theory of Mind

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30259349     DOI: 10.3758/s13415-018-0642-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  96 in total

1.  Motor cortex activation in Parkinson's disease: dissociation of electrocortical and peripheral measures of response generation.

Authors:  P Praamstra; E M Plat; A S Meyer; M W Horstink
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 10.338

Review 2.  Mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  J G Goldman; I Litvan
Journal:  Minerva Med       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.806

3.  Individual differences in conflict-monitoring: testing means and covariance hypothesis about the Simon and the Eriksen Flanker task.

Authors:  Doris Keye; Oliver Wilhelm; Klaus Oberauer; Don van Ravenzwaaij
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-11-26

4.  Influence of time-of-day on joint Navon effect.

Authors:  Marco Fabbri; Matteo Frisoni; Monica Martoni; Lorenzo Tonetti; Vincenzo Natale
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2017-11-28

5.  Do you really represent my task? Sequential adaptation effects to unexpected events support referential coding for the joint Simon effect.

Authors:  Bibiana Klempova; Roman Liepelt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-04-02

6.  Joint Simon effects for non-human co-actors.

Authors:  Anna Stenzel; Roman Liepelt
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  The joint flanker effect and the joint Simon effect: On the comparability of processes underlying joint compatibility effects.

Authors:  Kerstin Dittrich; Marie-Luise Bossert; Annelie Rothe-Wulf; Karl Christoph Klauer
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Neural correlates of true and false belief reasoning.

Authors:  Monika Sommer; Katrin Döhnel; Beate Sodian; Jörg Meinhardt; Claudia Thoermer; Göran Hajak
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-02-12       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  The influence of the Japanese waving cat on the joint spatial compatibility effect: A replication and extension of Dolk, Hommel, Prinz, and Liepelt (2013).

Authors:  Lydia Puffe; Kerstin Dittrich; Karl Christoph Klauer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs.

Authors:  Daniël Lakens
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-11-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.