Literature DB >> 22528121

Systems immunology: a survey of modeling formalisms, applications and simulation tools.

Vipin Narang1, James Decraene, Shek-Yoon Wong, Bindu S Aiswarya, Andrew R Wasem, Shiang Rong Leong, Alexandre Gouaillard.   

Abstract

Immunological studies frequently analyze individual components (e.g., signaling pathways) of immune systems in a reductionist manner. In contrast, systems immunology aims to give a synthetic understanding of how these components function together as a whole. While immunological research involves in vivo and in vitro experiments, systems immunology research can also be conducted in silico. With an increasing interest in systems-level studies spawned by high-throughput technologies, many immunologists are looking forward to insights provided by computational modeling and simulation. However, modeling and simulation research has mainly been conducted in computational fields, and therefore, little material is available or accessible to immunologists today. This survey is an attempt at bridging the gap between immunologists and systems immunology modeling and simulation. Modeling and simulation refer to building and executing an in silico replica of an immune system. Models are specified within a mathematical or algorithmic framework called formalism and then implemented using software tools. A plethora of modeling formalisms and software tools are reported in the literature for systems immunology. However, it is difficult for a new entrant to the field to know which of these would be suitable for modeling an immunological application at hand. This paper covers three aspects. First, it introduces the field of system immunology emphasizing on the modeling and simulation components. Second, it gives an overview of the principal modeling formalisms, each of which is illustrated with salient applications in immunological research. This overview of formalisms and applications is conducted not only to illustrate their power but also to serve as a reference to assist immunologists in choosing the best formalism for the problem at hand. Third, it lists major software tools, which can be used to practically implement models in these formalisms. Combined, these aspects can help immunologists to start experimenting with in silico models. Finally, future research directions are discussed. Particularly, we identify integrative frameworks to facilitate the coupling of different modeling formalisms and modeling the adaptation properties through evolution of immune systems as the next key research efforts necessary to further develop the multidisciplinary field of systems immunology.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22528121     DOI: 10.1007/s12026-012-8305-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Immunol Res        ISSN: 0257-277X            Impact factor:   2.829


  114 in total

1.  Stochasticity in transcriptional regulation: origins, consequences, and mathematical representations.

Authors:  T B Kepler; T C Elston
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  An approach to modelling in immunology.

Authors:  A Yates; C C Chan; R E Callard; A J George; J Stark
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 11.622

3.  Tools for kinetic modeling of biochemical networks.

Authors:  Rui Alves; Fernando Antunes; Armindo Salvador
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 4.  The model organism as a system: integrating 'omics' data sets.

Authors:  Andrew R Joyce; Bernhard Ø Palsson
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 94.444

5.  Affinity maturation and hypermutation in a simulation of the humoral immune response.

Authors:  F Celada; P E Seiden
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  A cellular automata model of tumor-immune system interactions.

Authors:  D G Mallet; L G De Pillis
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 2.691

7.  A hybrid cellular automaton model of clonal evolution in cancer: the emergence of the glycolytic phenotype.

Authors:  P Gerlee; A R A Anderson
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2007-11-04       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  Mathematical model of NF-kappaB regulatory module.

Authors:  Tomasz Lipniacki; Pawel Paszek; A R Allan R Brasier; Bruce Luxon; Marek Kimmel
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2004-05-21       Impact factor: 2.691

9.  A computational systems biology software platform for multiscale modeling and simulation: integrating whole-body physiology, disease biology, and molecular reaction networks.

Authors:  Thomas Eissing; Lars Kuepfer; Corina Becker; Michael Block; Katrin Coboeken; Thomas Gaub; Linus Goerlitz; Juergen Jaeger; Roland Loosen; Bernd Ludewig; Michaela Meyer; Christoph Niederalt; Michael Sevestre; Hans-Ulrich Siegmund; Juri Solodenko; Kirstin Thelen; Ulrich Telle; Wolfgang Weiss; Thomas Wendl; Stefan Willmann; Joerg Lippert
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Nitrite protects against morbidity and mortality associated with TNF- or LPS-induced shock in a soluble guanylate cyclase-dependent manner.

Authors:  Anje Cauwels; Emmanuel S Buys; Robrecht Thoonen; Lisa Geary; Joris Delanghe; Sruti Shiva; Peter Brouckaert
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Modeling the T cell immune response: a fascinating challenge.

Authors:  Penelope A Morel; James R Faeder; William F Hawse; Natasa Miskov-Zivanov
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 2.  Immune biomarkers: the promises and pitfalls of personalized medicine.

Authors:  Joanna C D Willis; Graham M Lord
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 53.106

Review 3.  A review of quantitative modeling of B cell responses to antigenic challenge.

Authors:  Timothy P Hickling; Xiaoying Chen; Paolo Vicini; Satyaprakash Nayak
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2014-10-19       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 4.  A case for the reuse and adaptation of mechanistic computational models to study transplant immunology.

Authors:  Miguel Fribourg
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 5.  Solving Immunology?

Authors:  Yoram Vodovotz; Ashley Xia; Elizabeth L Read; Josep Bassaganya-Riera; David A Hafler; Eduardo Sontag; Jin Wang; John S Tsang; Judy D Day; Steven H Kleinstein; Atul J Butte; Matthew C Altman; Ross Hammond; Stuart C Sealfon
Journal:  Trends Immunol       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 16.687

6.  Modelling cell surface dynamics and cell-cell interactions using Cell Studio: a three-dimensional visualization tool based on gaming technology.

Authors:  Asaf Liberman; Matan Mussel; Danny Kario; David Sprinzak; Uri Nevo
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Spatial and functional heterogeneities shape collective behavior of tumor-immune networks.

Authors:  Daniel K Wells; Yishan Chuang; Louis M Knapp; Dirk Brockmann; William L Kath; Joshua N Leonard
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Modeling leukocyte-leukocyte non-contact interactions in a lymph node.

Authors:  Nicola Gritti; Michele Caccia; Laura Sironi; Maddalena Collini; Laura D'Alfonso; Francesca Granucci; Ivan Zanoni; Giuseppe Chirico
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  On the coupling of two models of the human immune response to an antigen.

Authors:  Bárbara de M Quintela; Rodrigo Weber dos Santos; Marcelo Lobosco
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Assessing mathematical models of influenza infections using features of the immune response.

Authors:  Hana M Dobrovolny; Micaela B Reddy; Mohamed A Kamal; Craig R Rayner; Catherine A A Beauchemin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.